Skip to content
United Way of Muskingum Perry and Morgan Counties Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

United Way of Muskingum Perry and Morgan Counties Inc

United way agency

$464k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$82k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0179% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$122kEducation$116kHealth$59kPhilanthropy$58kHousing & Shelter$46kFood & Nutrition$15kEmployment$12kYouth Development$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 22 grants below total $433,230, the rows itemized in this filing. The $463,635 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $30,405 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $74k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $220k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $139k
$11,885
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALVATION ARMY$81,686
UNITED WAY OF GREATER DAYTON AREA$57,500
OHIO UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$49,666
ZANESVILLE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$37,700
BUCKEYE VALLEY FAMILY YMCA$30,975
GUERNSEY COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPME$25,224
MUSKINGUM COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATI$15,000
PERRY COUNTY DISTRICT LIBRARY$14,500
KATE LOVE SIMPSON MORGAN COUNTY LIB$12,000
MUSKINGUM VALLEY HEALTH CENTERS$11,989
PERRY COUNTY JOB & FAMILY SERVICES$11,885
NEW LEXINGTON LOCAL SCHOOLS$10,875
CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES$9,675
SOUTH EAST AREA TRANSIT$9,649
PERRY COUNTY HOUSING COALITION$8,215
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $41k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BUCKEYE VALLEY FAMILY YMCA: $31k → 14%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tuscarawas County Committee On Aging

To provide opportunities to individualsover 50 years of age in tuscarawas county, ohiothrough healthy living, independence, physical andmental health, education, and recreational programs

Human Services
2
United Way of Bucks County

United way of bucks county creates opportunities for quality education, financial stability, and good health to ensure real, lasting change for individuals and our communities.

Philanthropy
3
Ohio Hills Health Services

Ohio hills health services is a non-profit health care operation, organized by communities in eastern ohio to promote healthy lifestyles and to provide preventative and comprehensive medical and dental care for area residents. the primary…

—
4
Hancock-Hardin-Wyandot-Putnam Community Action Commission

To reduce the conditions of poverty by providing comprehensive services to improve lives.to accomplish the mission, hhwp cac will collect and analyze data on the nature of poverty and the existing resources in the area. hhwp cac will…

—
5
Cuyahoga Health Access Partnership

To transform cuyahoga county into a model of health and wellness by connecting individuals to access to care

—
6
Ohio United Way

To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.

Philanthropy
7
Empowering and Strengthening Ohio's People Inc

Empowering and strengthening ohio's people (esop) helps adults in all stages of life achieve and maintain financial wellness and housing stability.

Housing & Shelter
8
United Way of Licking County Inc

Improving people's lives in licking county, ohio by raising, prioritizing, awarding and monitoring funds allocated to programs that demonstrate success in the areas of education, income, health, and basic needs.

Philanthropy
9
Community Shelter Board

The community shelter board is ending homelessness by creating collaborations, innovating solutions, and investing in quality programs.

—
10
Muskingum Economic Opportunity Action Group

The organization's mission is to establish effective programs that mobilize and utilize bothpublic and private resources in a proactive and concerted attack on poverty in muskingum county, ohio and its surrounding areas by establishing and…

—
11
United Way of Central Ohio Inc

United way of central ohio is the local organization that harnesses the power of communities working together - people, nonprofits, businesses and government - to create a stronger, more equitable central ohio. see schedule o.we do this…

Philanthropy
12
United Way of North Central Ohio Inc

At united way of north central ohio, we bring people, organizations, and resources together to create solutions that improve the lives of every person in every community in our region.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Muskingum County Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Guernsey County Cdc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
3/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $2,213,406 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+12 more: $262,835 · Other+12 moreThe Ohio University Foundation: $49,666 · EducationZANE STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $6,183 · EducationLicking County Family YMCA: $30,975 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $9,675 · Human ServicesMuskingum Valley Health Center: $11,989 · HealthMUSKINGUM BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC: $8,133 · HealthACCESS TUSC: $7,750 · HealthFAMILY HEALTH SERVICES OF EAST CENTRAL OHIO: $5,800 · HealthGUERNSEY COUNTY CDC: $25,224 · Community ImprovementTHE MUSKINGUM COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Philanthropy
Other$2,476,241Education$55,849Human Services$40,650Health$33,672Community Improvement$25,224Philanthropy$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF THE GREATER DAYTON AREA: $57,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetThe Ohio University Foundation: $49,666 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SE OHIO: $37,700 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLicking County Family YMCA: $30,975 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGUERNSEY COUNTY CDC: $25,224 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE MUSKINGUM COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMuskingum Valley Health Center: $11,989 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $9,675 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMUSKINGUM BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC: $8,133 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetACCESS TUSC: $7,750 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetZANE STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $6,183 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON-MORGAN COUNTIES OHIO: $5,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY HEALTH SERVICES OF EAST CENTRAL OHIO: $5,800 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA MUSKINGUM VALLEY COUNCIL INC: $5,525 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Park National Corpora…J William & Mary Stra…The Muskingum County …Peoples Bank Foundati…Columbus FoundationFoundation for Appala…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Park National Corporation FoundationOH19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Park National Corporation Foundation · J William & Mary Straker Charitable Fdn · The Muskingum County Community Foundation · Peoples Bank Foundation · Columbus Foundation · Foundation for Appalachian Ohio · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Muskingum Perry and Morgan Counties Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Muskingum Perry and Morgan Counties Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Muskingum Perry and Morgan Counties’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home