· Public charity
United Way of Moore County
To advance the common good by focusing on the building blocks for a good life in our communities: a quality education that leads to a stable job, sustained financial independence, and good health
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 43% of UNITED WAY OF MOORE COUNTY’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 11 grants below total $221,049 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $246,235 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $25,186 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $22k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $144k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE CARE GROUP INC | $55,000 |
| FRIEND TO FRIEND | $28,002 |
| PARTNERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES | $25,000 |
| SANDHILLS COALITION FOR HUMAN CARE | $22,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $20,000 |
| BETHESDA INC | $18,872 |
| THE ARC OF MOORE COUNTY | $14,951 |
| MEALS ON WHEELS | $14,922 |
| BETHANY HOUSE | $9,302 |
| SANDHILLS STUDENT ASSISTANCE | $7,000 |
| NC AGRICULTURAL FOUNDATION MOORE 4H | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $250k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
15 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTHE CARE GROUP INC6× · 2020–2025 · $307k · revenue +277%
- NMNORTHERN MOORE FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC5× · 2020–2024 · $250k · revenue +169%
- FTFRIEND TO FRIEND6× · 2020–2025 · $186k · revenue +61%
Funded once
- BFBARRIER FREE GOLF INCone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -92%
- LRLUMBER RIVER UNITED WAYgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $14k · revenue +45%
- UWUNITED WAY OF HOKE COUNTY INCone grant, 2020 · $11k · revenue 0% · 74% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Receive and allocate funds to worthy educational and health & welfare organizations in the granville county, nc area.
To raise funds for various charitable organizations within the community.
Centralized funding agency which provided funds for other organizations.
To assist the needs of individuals, help them navigate past obstacles that prevent them from getting out of the cycle of homelessness and poverty, and assist them with achieving independent living.
Counseling and treatment for substance abuse
Provide short-term housing for homeless
Food distribution to the needy
To empower adults living with severe and persistent mental illness in north carolina with the tools to lead meaningful and independent lives.
Solicit and distribute funds to local charities.
Volunteer Avery County finds resources to aid families and individuals that do not qualify for public assistance and fall through the cracks.
Support of community agencies
Raise and distribte contributions to member charities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sandhills-Moore Coalition for Human Care Inc and the most unlike its peers is Barrier Free Golf Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE CARE GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN MOORE FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FRIEND TO FRIEND ↗
- Who funds SANDHILLS-MOORE COALITION FOR HUMAN CARE INC ↗
- Who funds BETHESDA INC ↗
- Who funds Meals on Wheels of the Sandhills INC ↗
- Who funds THE BETHANY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF MOORE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds MOORE COUNTY LITERACY COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds BARRIER FREE GOLF INC ↗
- Who funds THE NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SANDHILLS STUDENT ASSISTANCE INC ↗
- Who funds LEGAL SERVICES OF NC INC ↗
- Who funds LUMBER RIVER UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF LEE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF HOKE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds PATRIOT FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · North Carolina Community Foundation · Henry Nias Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of Moore County funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.