Skip to content
United Way of Madison County Indiana Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

United Way of Madison County Indiana Inc

To provide leadership and support in identifying and satisfying basic human needs and improving the quality of life in our communities.

$362k
Granted FY2021
6
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$104k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Human Services$507kHealth$450kCommunity Improvement$430kEmployment$398kHousing & Shelter$91kFood & Nutrition$65kReligion$16kCrime & Legal$10kOther$0
02FY2021 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $334k
$68,760
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Dove Harbor Co Madison Park$103,849
PathStone$99,974
Childrens Bureau Inc$68,760
Anderson Impact Center$61,608
Alternatives$20,000
Stripped Love$7,187
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–21, $275k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Rush County Community Asst: $15k → 12%Childrens Bureau Inc: $69k → 15%Childrens Bureau Inc: $69k → 15%Childrens Bureau Inc: $69k → 15%Childrens Bureau Inc: $20k → 15%Stripped Love: $13k → 15%Stripped Love: $7k → 15%Stripped Love: $7k → 15%Stripped Love: $7k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 7 repeat orgs$330k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against +46% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2021, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
10

Total granted

$1.6M
$330k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+46%

Still filing today

71%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationHealthCommunity ImprovementReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CB
    CHILDREN'S BUREAU INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $226k · revenue +64%
  • AI
    ALTERNATIVES INCORPORATED OF MADISON COUNTY
    5× · 2017–2021 · $114k · revenue +46%
  • GH
    Grace Horizon Inc
    3× · 2019–2021 · $34k · revenue +150%

Funded once

  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2020 · $102k
  • AH
    Anderson Housing Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $81k · revenue +15%
  • CM
    Carrie Mae Hyatt Food Pantry
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Anderson County Community Action Inc

The Anderson County Community Action Commission provides food, clothing, household foods, and essential assistance to low-income residents of Anderson County, Tennessee. The organization operates a community food pantry, clothing closet,…

—
2
Family Promise of Greater Indianapolis Inc

Indianapolis Interfaith Hospitality Network leverages the resources of houses of worship in the greater Indianapolis area to provide emergency shelter, food, case management, and aftercare services to families experiencing homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
3
Madison County Sheltered Workshop Inc

To provide employement opportunities to mentally or physically disabled individuals.

Human Services
4
Crisis Center of Anderson & Cherokee Co

To aid and support victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and child abuse.

Human Services
5
Hope House of Scott County

Domestic violence shelter and services for victims and their families

Human Services
6
Community Intervention Center of Lackawanna County

To provide shelter for the homeless during the day, provide professional crisis intervention, provide professional drug and alcohol abuse intervention, provide medical screening upon request and provide a representative payee program

Health
7
Community Ministries Inc Community Kitchen

Providing free lunches to the hungry, sheltering the homeless during inclement weather, and case management for those seeking financial assistance. services are offered to those in the paducah, kentucky area.

Religion
8
Chapel House Inc

Chapel house has a homeless shelter for men and roles programing for men and women, serving auburn and cayuga county. chapel house provide homeless men with emergency shelter and tools for self-sufficiency in a safe and respectful manner.…

Human Services
9
Carthage Crisis Center Inc

The carthage crisis center is committed to restoring homeless and needy people to self sufficiency with god's help.

Health
10
Interfaith Family Services of Ocean County of New Jersey

Assist homeless and unemployed to seek shelter and employment

Housing & Shelter
11
Ashtabula Homeless Shelterinc

Provide emergency shelter and meals, case management and assessment to homeless individuals and families from the ashtabula county and surrounding areas.

Housing & Shelter
12
Grace Resource Center Inc

To provide food, shelter, clothing, medical assistance and other immediate need to the thousands of needy and homeless people living in our area.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Aspire Indiana Inc; the most unlike its peers is Whole Family Community Initiative Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PATHSTONE CORPORATION: $454,114 · OtherPATHSTONE CORPORATIONMADISON PARK CHURCH OF GOD: $386,019 · OtherMADISON PARK CHURCH OF GODALTERNATIVES INCORPORATED OF MADISON COUNTY: $114,360 · OtherALTERNATIVES INCORPORATED OF MADISON COUNTYSALVATION ARMY: $102,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYCarrie Mae Hyatt Food Pantry: $50,000 · Other+2 more: $36,970 · OtherAnderson Impact Center Inc: $398,344 · EducationAnderson Impact Center…CHILDREN'S BUREAU INC: $226,280 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S BURE…Grace Horizon Inc: $34,061 · Human ServicesGrace Horizon I…RUSH COUNTY COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesRUSH COUNTY COM…Anderson Housing Inc: $81,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE SHELTER INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterAspire Indiana Inc: $20,000 · HealthWHOLE FAMILY COMMUNITY INITIATIVE INCORPORATED: $20,000 · Community ImprovementCHRISTIAN CENTER INC: $16,000 · ReligionCASA PROGRAM OF MADISON COUNTY INC DBA EAST CENTRAL INDIANA CASA: $10,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$1,143,463Education$398,344Human Services$275,341Housing & Shelter$91,000Health$20,000Community Improvement$20,000Religion$16,000Crime & Legal$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAnderson Impact Center Inc: $398,344 over 5y, 12% of budgetCHILDREN'S BUREAU INC: $226,280 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetALTERNATIVES INCORPORATED OF MADISON COUNTY: $114,360 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetAnderson Housing Inc: $81,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetGrace Horizon Inc: $34,061 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetOPERATION LOVE MINISTRIES INC: $30,610 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetAspire Indiana Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWHOLE FAMILY COMMUNITY INITIATIVE INCORPORATED: $20,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetCHRISTIAN CENTER INC: $16,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetRUSH COUNTY COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetCASA PROGRAM OF MADISON COUNTY INC DBA EAST CENTRAL INDIANA CASA: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Heart of Indiana Unit…Madison County Commun…Mibor Foundation IncCommunity Hospital of…Gaither Charitable Fo…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Heart of Indiana United Way IncIN24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Heart of Indiana United Way Inc · Madison County Community Foundation Inc · Mibor Foundation Inc · Community Hospital of Anderson and Madison County Inc · Gaither Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Madison County Indiana Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Madison County Indiana Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Madison County Indiana’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home