· Public charity
Mibor Foundation Inc
To raise funds and foster support for organizations transitioning central indiana's homeless to safe and secure housing.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 18 grants below total $227,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $320,441 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $92,941 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $36k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $192k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DAYSPRING CENTER | $20,000 |
| THE POURHOUSE INC | $20,000 |
| PATHWAY TO RECOVERY | $20,000 |
| HVAF OF INDIANA | $15,000 |
| SHELTERING WINGS CENTER FOR WOMEN INC | $15,000 |
| FAMILY PROMISE OF HENDRICKS COUNTY INC | $15,000 |
| DOVE RECOVERY HOUSE FOR WOMEN | $15,000 |
| FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER INDIANAPOLIS INC | $15,000 |
| 91 PLACE | $15,000 |
| TRINITY HAVEN | $12,000 |
| STOPOVER INC | $10,000 |
| KIDS IN CRISIS INTERVENTION TEAM | $10,000 |
| HOLY FAMILY SHELTER | $10,000 |
| ALTERNATIVES INC OF MADISON CO | $7,500 |
| STEP UP | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $575k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
31 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PTPathway to Recovery Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $117k · revenue +390%
- DCDayspring Center Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $95k · revenue +103%
- FPFamily Promise of Greater Indianapolis Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $66k · revenue +176%
Funded once
- FPFAMILY PROMISE OF HAMILTON CO INCgraduated3× · 2019–2021 · $12k · revenue +247%
- PIPARTNERS IN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -33%
- CSCOMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER OF MORGAN COUNTgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +114%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Home-first offers permanent solutions to homelessness by providing transitional housing and permanent housing, homelessness prevention assitance and support services to strengthen families and build commun
Provide low income and transitional housing to those in need in the aurora, in area.
Provide shelter and basic needs for homeless people. while fostering self-respect and human dignity, samaritan house will encourage the residents' efforts to find employment and housing.
Families in crisis, inc. houses, supports and empowers individuals affected by family violence, sexual assault, and homelessness.
Providing services to the homeless, low income individuals, and hiv/aids infected and affected individuals
See schedule oadvancing physical and emotional safety by reducing the impact and occurrence of sexual and domestic violence, human trafficking and stalking through inclusive intervention and prevention services for children, youth, and…
We provide housing for children in the foster care system, support young adults aging out of foster care (ages 18-20), and offer wraparound services for foster, adoptive, and birth families.
Bethany House Services empowers homeless and at-risk families with the solutions to achieve housing stability and long-term self-sufficiency.
Provides transitional housing for women in need who are pregnant, ages 18 through 30, as well as their children under age five who need a safe place to stay up to a year after their babies are born.
In recognition of the dignity and value of every human life, the mission of interfaith partnership for the homeless (iph) is to address the needs of the homeless and low-income community by providing a continuum of services to encourage…
Plan, coordinate and provide affordable housing to low-income individuals and families in Southeastern Indiana.
Emergency shelter for victims of domestic abuse and supportive services to all victims of abuse
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Outreach Inc and the most unlike its peers is Family Promise of Greater Indianapolis Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Pathway to Recovery Inc ↗
- Who funds Dayspring Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Stopover Inc ↗
- Who funds THE POURHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Family Promise of Greater Indianapolis Inc ↗
- Who funds HVAF OF INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds COBURN PLACE SAFEHAVEN II INC ↗
- Who funds DOVE RECOVERY HOUSE FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds GENNESARET FREE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds COLUMBUS REGIONAL SHELTER FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds SHELTERING WINGS CENTER FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF HENDRICKS COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities Indianapolis Inc ↗
- Who funds ALTERNATIVES INCORPORATED OF MADISON COUNTY ↗
- Who funds THE DAMIEN CENTER ↗
- Who funds DESERT ROSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TRINITY HAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds THE O'CONNOR HOUSE ↗
- Who funds 91 PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds Grace Horizon Inc ↗
- Who funds KIDS IN CRISIS INTERVENTION TEAM ↗
- Who funds JOHN P CRAINE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities Bloomington Inc ↗
- Who funds MIBOR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BROOKSIDE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF HAMILTON CO INC ↗
- Who funds OVERDOSE LIFELINE INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HOME INDY CO ↗
- Who funds TRUSTED MENTORS INC ↗
- Who funds IYG INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds STEP-UP INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S BUREAU INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER OF MORGAN COUNT ↗
- Who funds HORIZON HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds STABILITY FIRST INC ↗
- Who funds New Life JR Jessee Recovery House Inc ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · Lilly Endowment Inc · The Brave Heart Foundation Inc · Hoover Family Foundation · Richard M Fairbanks Foundation Inc · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · Second Helpings Inc · Hamilton County Community Foundation Inc · Indiana University Health Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mibor Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.