Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Kitsap County

UNITED WAY OF KITSAP COUNTYs mission is providing our community with resources and volunteers for a better tomorrow.

$43k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$688kPhilanthropy$524kHuman Services$462kArts & Culture$109kAnimals$99kFood & Nutrition$70kEnvironment$45kInternational$33kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$75,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UP FROM SLAVERY INITIATIVE$75,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $306k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $14k → 14%PEOPLE FOR PEOPLE: $22k → 17%HOLLY RIDGE CENTER: $9k → 10%PEOPLE FOR PEOPLE: $20k → 17%SOUTH KITSAP HELPLINE: $27k → 10%UP FROM SLAVERY INITIATIVE: $75k → 10%COFFEE OASIS: $39k → 10%KITSAP COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $30k → 10%COFFEE OASIS: $11k → 10%KITSAP COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $9k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $8k → 10%COFFEE OASIS: $5k → 10%KITSAP COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $5k → 10%NORTH KITSAP FISHLINE: $21k → 10%COFFEE OASIS: $5k → 10%CHILDREN OF THE NATIONS: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
CA
MD
TN
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$807k · 7 repeat orgs$979k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +99% since the first grant, against -42% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
45

Total granted

$807k
$904k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+99%
-42%

Still filing today

86%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyAnimalsFood & NutritionHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KM
    KITSAP MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
    4× · 2017–2021 · $502k · revenue +153%
  • THE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $109k · revenue +14%
  • TC
    THE COFFEE OASIS
    4× · 2017–2021 · $60k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF KITSAP COUNTY
    one grant, 2017 · $179k · revenue -61%
  • CC
    CHC CREATING HEALTHIER COMMUNITIES
    one grant, 2017 · $58k · revenue -49%
  • MF
    MILITARY FAMILY AND VETERANS SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2017 · $43k · revenue -86%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community First - America's Charities

To support, and be organized and operate to promote and support the activities and purposes of other 501(c)(3)organizations that assist children, families, adults & communities by providing services that further their exempt purposes.

Philanthropy
2
Americas Best Charities

Americas best charities raises funds and awareness to improve life both locally and globally by aiding our diverse partner charities and encouraging supporters to contribute to their cause.

Philanthropy
3
Chc Creating Healthier Communities Local

We envision a world where every person in every community has an opportunity to live their healthiest life.

—
4
Washington State Child Care Resource & Referral Network Dba Child Care Aware Wa

Child care aware of washington provides thorough and independent information and support for families seeking quality child care, for child care programs seeking to improve quality, and for effective policy making.

—
5
Kitsap Legal Services

Providing and facilitating access to justice in kitsap county for low-income individuals or marginalized communities through advocacy and free civil legal services.

Crime & Legal
6
Animal Welfare Fund Inc

We work with other not-for-profit organizations to help them increase their participation and success in public-sector workplace charitable fund drives. The federation screens applications for such drives, assists with the transfer of…

Animals
7
Children's Advocacy Centers of Washington

Children's advocacy centers of washington is a membership organization that provides support to communities that have formed or wish to form a children's advocacy center and promotes awareness of the incidence and impact of child abuse in…

Youth Development
8
Human Care Charities of America

The organization operates as a charitable federation, encouraging and facilitating the making of voluntary contributions to charitable agencies it represents.

—
9
Washington State Community Action Partnership

Washington state community action partnership works to build healthy communities and eliminate poverty through a unified network of community action agencies across washington state.

Community Improvement
10
Housing Connector

Housing connector partners with property owners and managers to lower barriers to housing and increase our region's affordable housing capacity.

Housing & Shelter
11
Local Animal Charities of America

Local animal charities of america raises funds and awareness to improve the lives of animals by aiding our partner charities and encouraging supporters to contribute to their cause.

Recreation & Sports
12
Give Back Foundation

To encourage more giving. more people, giving more, more often, to more charitable organizations.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Women Children and Family Service Charities of America; the most unlike its peers is Kitsap Black Student Union. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/51
Grantees still filing
25/51
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KITSAP MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES: $502,086 · OtherKITSAP MENTAL HEALTH SERVICESTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION: $108,505 · OtherTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATIONCHC CREATING HEALTHIER COMMUNITIES: $58,368 · OtherCHC CREATING HEALTHIER COMMUNITIESMILITARY FAMILY AND VETERANS SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS OF AMERICA: $43,314 · Other+24 more: $303,723 · Other+24 moreKITSAP COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $307,646 · PhilanthropyKITSAP COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONUNITED WAY OF KITSAP COUNTY: $179,168 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF KITSAP COUNTYHEALTH & MEDICAL RESEARCH CHARITIES OF AMERICA: $37,883 · PhilanthropyHEALTH & MEDICAL RESEARCH CHARI…+6 more: $66,268 · Philanthropy+6 moreUp From Slavery Initiative: $75,000 · Human ServicesUp From Slavery In…THE COFFEE OASIS: $60,461 · Human ServicesTHE COFFEE OASISKITSAP COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $44,656 · Human ServicesKITSAP COMMUNITY R…PEOPLE FOR PEOPLE: $41,667 · Human ServicesPEOPLE FOR PEOPLESOUTH KITSAP HELPLINE: $26,576 · Human ServicesSOUTH KITSAP HELPL…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $22,656 · Human ServicesAmerican National …NORTH KITSAP FISHLINE: $21,154 · Human ServicesNORTH KITSAP FISHL…CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WESTERN WASHINGTON: $20,285 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC COMMUNITY…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $14,254 · Human Services+2 more: $14,350 · Human ServicesKITSAP HUMANE SOCIETY: $35,786 · AnimalsANIMAL CHARITIES OF AMERICA: $35,342 · AnimalsANIMAL RESCUE FAMILIES: $12,610 · AnimalsPAWS OF BREMERTON: $9,988 · AnimalsCentral Kitsap Food Bank: $31,014 · Food & NutritionBREMERTON SERVICES ASSOCIATION: $12,359 · Food & NutritionKITSAP BLACK STUDENT UNION: $16,309 · Youth DevelopmentGlobal Impact: $15,653 · International
Other$1,015,996Philanthropy$590,965Human Services$341,059Animals$93,726Food & Nutrition$43,373Youth Development$16,309International$15,653

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKITSAP MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES: $502,086 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetKITSAP COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $307,646 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF KITSAP COUNTY: $179,168 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION: $108,505 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUp From Slavery Initiative: $75,000 over 1y, 48% of budgetTHE COFFEE OASIS: $60,461 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetCHC CREATING HEALTHIER COMMUNITIES: $58,368 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKITSAP COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $44,656 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMILITARY FAMILY AND VETERANS SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS OF AMERICA: $43,314 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPEOPLE FOR PEOPLE: $41,667 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTH & MEDICAL RESEARCH CHARITIES OF AMERICA: $37,883 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetKITSAP HUMANE SOCIETY: $35,786 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetANIMAL CHARITIES OF AMERICA: $35,342 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCentral Kitsap Food Bank: $31,014 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetCANCERCURE OF AMERICA- CARE UNDERSTAND RESEARCH & END: $27,809 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBremerton Foodline: $26,868 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetSOUTH KITSAP HELPLINE: $26,576 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $22,656 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH KITSAP FISHLINE: $21,154 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WESTERN WASHINGTON: $20,285 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKITSAP BLACK STUDENT UNION: $16,309 over 1y, 14% of budgetGlobal Impact: $15,653 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDRENS CHARITIES OF AMERICA: $15,111 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $14,254 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN FIRST - AMERICA'S CHARITIES: $13,153 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICA'S CHARITIES: $13,120 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANIMAL RESCUE FAMILIES: $12,610 over 1y, 28% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KITSAP COUNTY: $12,571 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCHILDRENS MED RES CHARITIES OF AMER DBA CHILDRENS MED & RES CHAR OF AMER: $12,553 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBREMERTON SERVICES ASSOCIATION: $12,359 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCONSERVATION & PRESERVATION CHARITIES OF AMERICA DBA CONSERVE NOW: $11,943 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMILITARY SUPPORT GROUPS OF AMERICA: $11,833 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCHRISTIAN CHARITIES USA: $11,783 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPAWS OF BREMERTON: $9,988 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetCHARITY WITHOUT BORDERS: $9,331 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWOMEN CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICE CHARITIES OF AMERICA: $9,168 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCATHOLIC SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS OF AMERICA: $8,830 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHOLLY RIDGE CENTER: $8,655 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMEDICAL RESEARCH CHARITIES INC: $8,424 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetJEFFERSON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHEALTH FIRST - AMERICA'S CHARITIES: $7,622 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $7,436 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetEDUCATE AMERICATHE EDUCATION SCHOOL SUPPORT AND SCHOLARSHIP FUNDS COALITION: $7,394 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAS BEST LOCAL CHARITIES: $6,768 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAS MOST COST EFFECTIVE CHARITIES: $6,232 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN OF THE NATIONS: $5,695 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKITSAP SEXUAL ASSAULT CENTER: $5,516 over 2y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Give Back FoundationWI62.2× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Give Back Foundation · Federal Employees Support for Cfc Charitable Giving Incorporated · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The United Way of the Greater Dayton Area · United Way of South Hampton Roads · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · Campaigning for Charities · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · United Way of Central Ohio Inc · Rappahannock United Way Inc · United Way California Capital Region · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Kitsap County funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Kitsap County. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on United Way of Kitsap County’s filings →

More from the funding graph