Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Illinois Valley

To improve the quality of life of all people by gathering and distributing, in an efficient and accountable manner, community resources which respond to priority health and human service needs.

$163k
Granted FY2026still arriving
12
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2026.

Health$217kYouth Development$203kFood & Nutrition$142kHuman Services$124kEducation$93kCrime & Legal$79kPhilanthropy$6kReligion$5k
02FY2026 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $134,371, the rows itemized in this filing. The $163,421 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $29,050 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k7 grants · $53k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $81k
$9,800
Median grant
1
States reached
$594k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ILLINOIS VALLEY FOOD PANTRY$26,700
HORIZON HOUSE OF IL VALLEY$21,500
LIGHTED WAY ASSOCIATION$11,000
YOUTH SERVICES BUREAU OF IV$11,000
CENTER FOR YOUTH & FAMILY SOL$10,900
IVICL$9,800
PRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES$9,240
MENDOTA AREA SENIOR SERVICES$8,500
SAFE JOURNEYS$7,531
ILLINOIS VALLEY YMCA$7,100
LASALLE COUNTY CASA$5,600
VOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $169k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%ILLINOIS VALLEY YMCA: $7k → 15%Illinois Valley Y: $5k → 15%Youth Service Bureau of Illinois Valley: $39k → 15%LASALLE COUNTY CASA: $6k → 15%LASALLE COUNTY CASA: $6k → 15%LASALLE COUNTY CASA: $6k → 15%Illinois Valley Center for Independent Living: $11k → 15%SAFE JOURNEYS: $8k → 15%SAFE JOURNEYS: $8k → 15%SAFE JOURNEYS: $7k → 15%ADV & SAS: $7k → 15%SAFE JOURNEYS: $7k → 15%ADV & SAS: $7k → 15%ADV & SAS: $7k → 15%Alternatives for Domestic Violence: $7k → 15%MENDOTA AREA SENIOR SERVICES: $9k → 15%MENDOTA AREA SENIOR SERVICES: $8k → 15%MENDOTA AREA SENIOR SERVICES: $6k → 15%MENDOTA AREA SENIOR SERVICES: $6k → 15%MENDOTA AREA SENIOR SERVICES: $6k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$796k · 14 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2026, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
3

Total granted

$796k
$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+101%
+118%

Still filing today

50%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesFood & NutritionCrime & LegalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HH
    HORIZON HOUSE OF ILLINOIS VALLEY INC
    8× · 2017–2026 · $150k · revenue +62%
  • IV
    ILLINOIS VALLEY FOOD PANTRY
    8× · 2017–2026 · $142k · revenue +101%
  • LW
    LIGHTED WAY ASSOCIATION INC
    6× · 2017–2026 · $93k · revenue +195%

Funded once

  • YS
    YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ILLINOIS VALLEYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $39k · revenue +118%
  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES
    one grant, 2017 · $18k
  • IV
    ILLINOIS VALLEY CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVINGgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $11k · revenue +41%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Casa of Southern Illinois Inc

Court appointed special advocates for children

Civil Rights
2
Illinois Public Action to Deliver Shelter

Provide emergency food and shelter

Housing & Shelter
3
Casa of South Central Illinois

The trained volunteers of CASA of South Central Illinois will work with legal and child welfare professionals, educators, and service providers to advocate for the best interests of children that have experienced abuse and/or neglect that…

—
4
Illinois Institute for Children

Providing Social Services to Families including Child Care

Human Services
5
Central Illinois Riding Therapy Inc

Riding therapy for disabled

Health
6
Illinois Self-Advocacy Alliance

The Illinois Self-Advocacy Alliance is a statewide network of self-advocates, self-advocacy groups, and allies in Illinois. We support people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) to develop self-advocacy skills so they…

Civil Rights
7
Central Illinois Services

To foster low income housing, develop and promote affordable homeownership and rental opportunities, support community develpment, social services, and educational opportunities for individuals and families throughout menard county and the…

—
8
Community Workshop & Training Center Inc

Our central Illinois organization provides programs and services to adults with disabilities; enriching their quality of life, promoting social change, and optimizing their potential for independence.

Human Services
9
Central Illinois Service Access Inc

Our mission is to maximize independence for individuals with disabilities through choice, advocacy and service access.

—
10
Boone County Casa

Advocacy for abused and neglected children

Crime & Legal
11
Illinois Coalition for Community Services

To provide support and assistance to community driven programs and services that seek to improve the quality of life for youth, families and communities.

Community Improvement
12
Casa of West Central Illinois

To advocate for abused and neglected children in the legal welfare system.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Illinois Valley Center for Independent Living; the most unlike its peers is Mendota Area Senior Service Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HORIZON HOUSE OF ILLINOIS VALLEY INC: $150,000 · OtherHORIZON HOUSE OF ILLINOIS VALLEY INCLIGHTED WAY ASSOCIATION INC: $93,137 · OtherLIGHTED WAY ASSOCIATION INCCENTER FOR YOUTH & FAMILY SOL: $92,560 · OtherCENTER FOR YOUTH & FAMILY SOLIVICL: $47,300 · OtherIVICLYOUTH SERVICES BUREAU OF IV: $37,500 · OtherYOUTH SERVICES BUREAU OF IVIVCIL: $19,400 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $17,500 · OtherYOUTH SERVICES BUREAU OF IL V: $16,500 · OtherDANI-BRANDON CENTER FOR CHILD: $16,500 · OtherSAFE JOURNEYS: $56,073 · Human ServicesSAFE JOURNEYSYOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ILLINOIS VALLEY: $38,750 · Human ServicesYOUTH SERVICE BUREAU O…MENDOTA AREA SENIOR SERVICE INC: $34,000 · Human ServicesMENDOTA AREA SENIOR SE…CASA OF THE ILLINOIS VALLEY: $17,600 · Human ServicesCASA OF THE ILLINOIS V…ILLINOIS VALLEY YMCA: $12,100 · Human ServicesILLINOIS VALLEY YMCAILLINOIS VALLEY CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $10,775 · Human ServicesILLINOIS VALLEY CENTER…ILLINOIS VALLEY FOOD PANTRY: $142,000 · Food & NutritionILLINOIS VALLEY FO…PRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC: $61,240 · Crime & LegalVOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS: $5,500 · Philanthropy
Other$490,397Human Services$169,298Food & Nutrition$142,000Crime & Legal$61,240Philanthropy$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHORIZON HOUSE OF ILLINOIS VALLEY INC: $150,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetILLINOIS VALLEY FOOD PANTRY: $142,000 over 8y, 8.0% of budgetLIGHTED WAY ASSOCIATION INC: $93,137 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetPRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC: $61,240 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSAFE JOURNEYS: $56,073 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetYOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ILLINOIS VALLEY: $38,750 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMENDOTA AREA SENIOR SERVICE INC: $34,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetCASA OF THE ILLINOIS VALLEY: $17,600 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetILLINOIS VALLEY YMCA: $12,100 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetILLINOIS VALLEY CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $10,775 over 1y, 2.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HORIZON HOUSE OF ILLINOIS VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds ILLINOIS VALLEY FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds LIGHTED WAY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE JOURNEYS ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ILLINOIS VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds MENDOTA AREA SENIOR SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF THE ILLINOIS VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds ILLINOIS VALLEY YMCA ↗
  • Who funds ILLINOIS VALLEY CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bradley Fedorow Perpetual Charitable TrustIL24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bradley Fedorow Perpetual Charitable Trust · The Covia Foundation · United Way of Eastern la Salle County Inc · Western Illinois Area Agency on Aging · The Chicago Community Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Illinois Valley funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Illinois Valley. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to United Way of Illinois Valley?

    Find your warmest path to United Way of Illinois Valley through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Illinois Valley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph