How much did WESTERN ILLINOIS AREA AGENCY ON AGING grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 43% of WESTERN ILLINOIS AREA AGENCY ON AGING’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k2 grants · $12k
$10k–50k9 grants · $198k
$50k–250k5 grants · $901k
$250k+8 grants · $6.4M

$150,488

Median grant

States reached

$2.6M

Total assets

Largest grants

PROJECT NOW$1,591,578
VOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER$1,287,038
ALTERNATIVES INC$922,732
HENRY CO SENIOR CITIZENS$773,729
VNA COMMUNITY SERVICES$643,815
JAMIESON COMMUNITY CTR$436,334
MCDONOUGH CO YMCA$412,743
STROM CENTER$296,354
BUREAU CO SENIOR CITIZENS$243,215
MENDOTA AREA SENIOR SERVICES$236,440
PUTNAM CO ACHIEVEMENT SERVICES$168,359
MERCER CO SENIOR CITIZENS$150,488
PRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES$102,600
CITY OF GALESBURG TRANSIT$42,484
ADDUS HEALTHCARE$30,894

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $12.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 11%. 77% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$32M · 26 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.

26 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$32M

$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%

+32%

Still filing today

62%

100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesPhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

PN
PROJECT NOW
7× · 2018–2024 · $7.0M · revenue +61%
VA
VOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER
7× · 2018–2024 · $5.4M · revenue +13%
AI
ALTERNATIVES INC
7× · 2018–2024 · $4.1M · revenue +34%

Funded once

IC
ILLINOISIOWA CILgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $6k · revenue +32%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Mid-Illinois Senior Services Inc

To provide a variety of services for senior citizens

Human Services

Seniors Assistance Center

Provide necessary services to senior citizens.

—

Boone County Senior Citizens Services Corporation

The promotion of health care to the citizens of boone county, missouri and surrounding areas.

Human Services

Nixa Senior Citizens Center

Provide services to senior citizens

—

Fayette County Commission On Aging

Senior citizen activity center-the fayette county commission on aging serves and represents those adults 60 years of age and older in fayette county. the emphasis is on improving the quality of life of those fayette county citizens, 60 and…

—

Washington County Senior Services Inc

To provide congregate meals, home delivered meals, transportation, and information and assistance to senior citizens of washington county, illinois.

—

West Central Illinois Aging &

Services for the aged.

Human Services

Mid-Columbia Senior Center Inc

The mid-columbia senior center provides social and other beneficial services to seniors.

Unclassified

Senior Services of Central Illinois

To support and serve seniors with non-medical services and to promote independent living and enrich quality of life.

Food & Nutrition

Council on Aging Services for Seniors

The Council on Aging provides essential services to our senior community through an integrated network of programs working together to fulfill our clients' needs. We currently have 12 programs including: Meals on Wheels, Senior Dining…

—

Marion County Council On Aging Inc

Services for the elderly

Human Services

Senior Citizen Services Inc

To promote positive aging and enhance the quality of life for all generations through multi-service programs for older persons in the city of sioux falls, sd and the surrounding areas.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Illinois Iowa Center for and the most unlike its peers is The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

18/19

Grantees still filing

17/19

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$13,728,819Human Services$12,790,425Philanthropy$5,359,918Crime & Legal$379,400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Warren County United WayIL16× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Warren County United Way · Bradley Fedorow Perpetual Charitable Trust · United Way of Knox County Inc · Galesburg Community Foundation · The Covia Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation WESTERN ILLINOIS AREA AGENCY ON AGING funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MERCER CO SENIOR CITIZENS.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~5 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.3× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 362907240 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on MERCER CO SENIOR CITIZENS, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 5 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 92% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Western Illinois Area Agency on Aging?

Find your warmest path to Western Illinois Area Agency on Aging through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

WESTERN ILLINOIS AREA AGENCY ON AGING

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Western Illinois Area Agency on Aging?

More from the funding graph

WESTERN ILLINOIS AREA AGENCY ON AGING

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Western Illinois Area Agency on Aging?

More from the funding graph