Skip to content
United Way of Grayson County Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

United Way of Grayson County Inc

United way of grayson county mobilizes our community so all can thrive.

$324k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.3MHuman Services$1.1MYouth Development$955kHousing & Shelter$374kFood & Nutrition$361kCrime & Legal$358kPhilanthropy$241kPublic Safety & Disaster$236kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 19 grants below total $284,964, the rows itemized in this filing. The $324,242 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $39,278 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $66k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $219k
$12,410
Median grant
1
States reached
$798k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DONOR DESIGNATED FOR OTHER SERVICES$45,496
DONOR DESIGNATED FOR OTHER SERVICES$30,216
MEALS ON WHEELS OF TEXOMA$20,750
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DENISON$20,455
FOUR RIVERS OUTREACH$18,750
TEXOMA FAMILY SHELTER$18,200
FAMILY PROMISE$16,205
GRAYSON CTNY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$14,100
FOUR RIVERS OUTREACH$12,500
DONOR DESIGNATED FOR OTHER SERVICES$12,410
BARNABAS FOOD PANTRY$10,000
THE REHABILITATION CENTER$9,399
GRAND CENTRAL STATION$9,283
CHILD & FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER$9,250
FEED MY SHEEP$8,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $729k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%GRAYSON COUNTY SHELTER: $15k → 8%GRAYSON COUNTY SHELTER: $25k → 11%GRAYSON CO WOMEN'S CRISIS LINE: $23k → 11%TEXOMA FAMILY SHELTER: $19k → 11%GRAYSON COUNTY SHELTER: $19k → 11%TEXOMA FAMILY SHELTER: $18k → 11%TEXOMA FAMILY SHELTER: $16k → 11%TEXOMA FAMILY SHELTER: $15k → 11%GRAYSON COUNTY SHELTER INC: $13k → 11%TEXOMA FAMILY SHELTER: $8k → 11%FOUR RIVERS OUTREACH INC: $120k → 11%FOUR RIVERS OUTREACH: $98k → 11%FOUR RIVERS OUTREACH: $74k → 11%FOUR RIVERS OUTREACH: $61k → 11%FOUR RIVERS OUTREACH: $49k → 11%FOUR RIVERS OUTREACH: $45k → 11%FOUR RIVERS OUTREACH: $26k → 11%FOUR RIVERS OUTREACH: $25k → 11%FOUR RIVERS OUTREACH: $19k → 11%FOUR RIVERS OUTREACH: $13k → 11%FOUR RIVERS OUTREACH: $13k → 11%FOUR RIVERS OUTREACH: $13k → 11%FOUR RIVERS OUTREACH: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.0M · 34 repeat orgs$491k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
12

Total granted

$5.0M
$434k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+19%

Still filing today

47%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FR
    FOUR RIVERS OUTREACH INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $559k · revenue +15%
  • TR
    The Rehabilitation Center
    9× · 2017–2025 · $495k · revenue +55%
  • BG
    Boys & Girls Club of Denison Texas
    8× · 2017–2025 · $379k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • TS
    TRI-COUNTY SENIOR NUTRITION PROGRAM
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • BG
    BOYS & GRILS CLUB OF DENISON
    one grant, 2018 · $73k
  • CF
    CHILD & FAMILY GUIDANCE CLINIC
    one grant, 2017 · $68k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Grayson County Welfare Board Inc

To provide for children in the custody of the Texas Department of Regulatory Services.

Human Services
2
Casa of Williamson County Texas

CASA of Williamson County, TX exists to empower community volunteers to advocate for children who have experienced abuse or neglect to find loving, safe, and permanent homes.

Crime & Legal
3
Guadalupe County Children's Advocacy Center

To advocate for and provide services to children and families when there are allegations of abuse and neglect throughout the investigation,prosecution, treatment, and prevention of child abuse, and to reduce the trauma to childrent with…

Crime & Legal
4
Resource & Crisis Center of Galveston County Texas

The mission of the Resource & Crisis Center of Galveston County, Inc. is to promote the safety, well-being and best interests of victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, child abuse, and human trafficking and to advocate for the…

Human Services
5
Family Counseling Center of Central Georgia Inc

Strengthen and preserve the well-being of individuals, couples, and families through easy, affordable access to professional counseling services.

—
6
Eastland County Crisis Center Inc

To provide services designed to meet the physical, social, and emotional needs of domestic violence and sexual assault victims by providing for immediate, short, and long-term needs.

Human Services
7
Grace House Texarkana Inc

Grace House exists to rescue and advocate for women and families at risk.

Housing & Shelter
8
Greater Chattanooga Christian Services Inc

Provide Group and Foster care for Homeless Children and Counseling

Human Services
9
Womens Center of Brazoria County Inc

Comprehensive service to domestic violence and sexual assault victims

Human Services
10
Lone Star Casa Inc

Lone Star CASA elevates the voices of children in Kaufman and Rockwall County who have experienced abuse and neglect by providing trained volunteer advocates to work alongside children and families so they can achieve safety and stability…

Civil Rights
11
Crisis Center of Russell County

The Crisis Center of Russell County was organized to provide assistance and temporary housing to victims of domestic abuse through secured temporary housing and education with job placement to transition them back into society. In…

Public Safety & Disaster
12
Great Plains Youth & Family Service

Provide child abuse prevention, community risk service, delinquency prevention and early childhood intervention programs as well as diversionary services in western oklahoma.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child and Family Guidance Center of Texoma; the most unlike its peers is The Rehabilitation Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Rehabilitation Center: $495,187 · OtherThe Rehabilitation CenterCHILD & FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER: $337,878 · OtherCHILD & FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $323,958 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SHERMAN INC: $294,766 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SHERMAN INCDONOR DESIGNATED FOR OTHER SERVICES: $294,450 · OtherDONOR DESIGNATED FOR OTHER SERVICESHOME HOSPICE OF GRAYSON COUNTY INC: $259,821 · OtherHOME HOSPICE OF GRAYSON COUNTY INCSALVATION ARMY: $229,852 · OtherSALVATION ARMYIndividual grant recipient: $167,326 · Other+29 more: $1,220,454 · Other+29 moreFOUR RIVERS OUTREACH INC: $559,162 · Human ServicesFOUR RIVERS OUT…Texoma Family Shelter: $146,947 · Human ServicesTexoma Family S…Grayson County Women's Crisis Line Inc: $52,500 · Human ServicesGrayson County …Boys & Girls Club of Denison Texas: $378,583 · Youth DevelopmentBoys & Girl…GRAYSON COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $181,301 · Youth DevelopmentGRAYSON COU…+1 more: $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentGREATER TEXOMA HEALTH CLINIC: $193,004 · HealthWOMEN ROCK INC: $28,243 · HealthCHILD AND FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER OF TEXOMA: $9,250 · HealthCASA OF GRAYSON COUNTY INC: $147,966 · Civil RightsTEXOMA REGIONAL FOUNDATION: $83,500 · PhilanthropyHOUSE OF ELI INC: $43,315 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY PROMISE OF GRAYSON COUNTY: $16,205 · Housing & Shelter
Other$3,623,692Human Services$758,609Youth Development$565,884Health$230,497Civil Rights$147,966Philanthropy$83,500Housing & Shelter$59,520

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOUR RIVERS OUTREACH INC: $559,162 over 9y, 17% of budgetThe Rehabilitation Center: $495,187 over 9y, 20% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Denison Texas: $378,583 over 8y, 18% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SHERMAN INC: $294,766 over 9y, 5.8% of budgetHOME HOSPICE OF GRAYSON COUNTY INC: $259,821 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetGREATER TEXOMA HEALTH CLINIC: $193,004 over 7y, 4.5% of budgetGRAYSON COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $181,301 over 6y, 9.0% of budgetCASA OF GRAYSON COUNTY INC: $147,966 over 5y, 8.2% of budgetTexoma Family Shelter: $146,947 over 8y, 8.3% of budgetTEXOMA REGIONAL FOUNDATION: $83,500 over 4y, 50% of budgetGrayson County Women's Crisis Line Inc: $52,500 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetHOUSE OF ELI INC: $43,315 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetGRAYSON GRAND CENTRAL STATION: $34,533 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetGRAYSON COUNTY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $29,934 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetWOMEN ROCK INC: $28,243 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetMULTICULTURAL FAMILY CENTER: $12,042 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetCHILD AND FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER OF TEXOMA: $9,250 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHEAST TEXAS: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOUR RIVERS OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds The Rehabilitation Center ↗
  • Who funds Boys & Girls Club of Denison Texas ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SHERMAN INC ↗
  • Who funds HOME HOSPICE OF GRAYSON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER TEXOMA HEALTH CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds GRAYSON COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF GRAYSON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Texoma Family Shelter ↗
  • Who funds TEXOMA REGIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Grayson County Women's Crisis Line Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF ELI INC ↗
  • Who funds GRAYSON GRAND CENTRAL STATION ↗
  • Who funds GRAYSON COUNTY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN ROCK INC ↗
  • Who funds TRI-COUNTY SENIOR NUTRITION PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Clara B & W Aubrey Sm…Texoma Community Foun…Elias & Hanna Regensb…Wilson N Jones Commun…Texas Instruments Fou…W B Munson Foundation…Texoma Medical Center…Dorset Foundation Inc…The Oliver Dewey Mayo…Dr & Mrs Paul Pierce …Sherman Service LeagueCommunities Foundatio…
Clara B & W Aubrey Smith CharitableTX39.1× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Clara B & W Aubrey Smith Charitable · Texoma Community Foundation · Elias & Hanna Regensburger Foundation · Wilson N Jones Community Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · W B Munson Foundation Xxxxx5008 · Texoma Medical Center Volunteers · Dorset Foundation Inc Attn Marty Sanderson · The Oliver Dewey Mayor Foundation · Dr & Mrs Paul Pierce Memorial Foundation · Sherman Service League · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Grayson County Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Grayson County Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Grayson County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home