· Public charity
United Way of Calhoun County
The mission of the UNITED WAY OF CALHOUN COUNTY is to help increase the organized capacity of people in calhoun county to care for one another.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $34k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $187k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $109k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CALHOUN COMMUNITY MINISTRIES | $59,000 |
| CALHOUN COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS | $50,000 |
| CALHOUN COUNTY YMCA | $37,500 |
| THE HARBOR CHILDRENS ALLIANCE | $35,000 |
| MID COAST FAMILY SERVICES | $28,000 |
| THE HARBOR'S BENEVOLENCE FUND | $25,000 |
| GOLDEN CRESCENT CASA | $23,000 |
| FOOD BANK OF THE GOLDEN CRESCENT | $20,000 |
| BILLY T CATTAN RECOVERY OUTREACH | $18,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $9,785 |
| GIRL SCOUTS OF GREATER SOUTH TEXAS | $9,000 |
| SOUTH TEXAS ASSESSMENT AND REFERRAL | $9,000 |
| GULF COAST COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $418k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 20%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
22 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MFMID-COAST FAMILY SERVICES9× · 2017–2025 · $195k · revenue +140%
- GCGOLDEN CRESCENT COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC9× · 2017–2025 · $186k · revenue +40%
- BTBILLY T CATTAN RECOVERY OUTREACH9× · 2017–2025 · $135k · revenue +938%
Funded once
- GCGOLDEN CRESCENT REGIONAL PLANone grant, 2022 · $10k
- STSOUTH TEXAS ASSESSMENT AND REone grant, 2023 · $9k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To advocate for and provide services to children and families when there are allegations of abuse and neglect throughout the investigation,prosecution, treatment, and prevention of child abuse, and to reduce the trauma to childrent with…
To provide a neutral, child-friendly agency community that facilitates a multidisciplinary approach to the prevention, detection, investigation, and treatment of child abuse.
To provide services for the protection of abused and neglected children that are in the custody of the State of Texas.
To protect and enhance the quality of life for abused and neglected children in Medina, Real and Uvalde Counties of Texas.
Tuscaloosa children's center, inc. is a non-profit organization serving as an interview facility designed to coordinate the efforts of local law enforcement, social service and professional agencies in such ways as to meet the needs of…
The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.
To provide a neutral, child friendly organization that facilitates a multi-disciplinary approach to the investigation, intervention and treatment of child abuse.
The children's advocacy center of van zandt county is committed to ensuring quality services and support to those children impacted by abuse while also building a future where no child in van zandt county experiences abuse.
To provide shelter, supervision, and counseling for children in crisis; to cooperate with other agencies in order to resolve problems related to the welfare of these children; to assist the families of these children in seeking possible…
The children's advocacy center of greater west texas, inc.'s mission is to champion the prevention of child abuse and to serve as an ally of abused children with a dedication to securing a safe and nurturing home for each child.
To bring together community resources to speed the healing of child victims of abuse and trauma.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Welfare Alliance of Calhoun C Inc and the most unlike its peers is Calhoun County Senior Citizens Asso. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MID-COAST FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds GOLDEN CRESCENT COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC ↗
- Who funds CALHOUN COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS ASSO ↗
- Who funds BILLY T CATTAN RECOVERY OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds CHILD WELFARE ALLIANCE OF CALHOUN C INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE GOLDEN CRESCENT INC ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF VICTORIA DBA FOOD BANK OF THE GOLDEN CRESCENT ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF GREATER SOUTH TEXAS ↗
- Who funds CHILD STUDY CLINIC ↗
- Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA SOUTH TEXAS COUNCIL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The O'Connor & Hewitt Foundation · Dick Albert & Mary Charitable Tr · York Albert E & Myrtle Gunn Trust · Texas Mutual Insurance Company · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of Calhoun County funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.