· Public charity
United States Soccer Federation
To work in service to soccer and ignite a national passion for the game.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k19 grants · $463k
- $50k–250k16 grants · $2.3M
- $250k+3 grants · $1.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION | $550,000 |
| FAYETTE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS | $347,684 |
| CALIFORNIA SOUTH STATE SOCCER ASSN | $259,779 |
| EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION | $214,325 |
| FLORIDA YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION INC | $206,091 |
| KENTUCKY YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION INC | $202,708 |
| MASSACHUSETTS YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION INC | $198,017 |
| AMERICAN AMPUTEE SOCCER ASSOCIATION | $195,813 |
| NEBRASKA STATE SOCCER ASSOCIATION | $186,230 |
| SOUTH TEXAS YOUTH SOCCER ASSN | $166,313 |
| UNITED STATES YOUTH FUTSAL FOUNDATION | $159,506 |
| CALIFORNIA YOUTH SOCCER ASSOC-NORTH | $153,500 |
| IDAHO YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION | $145,050 |
| MISSISSIPPI SOCCER ASSOCIATION | $100,194 |
| KANSAS STATE YOUTH SOCCER ASSN | $93,750 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
51 repeat relationships — 33 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.6M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EPEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA YOUTH SOCCER A5× · 2020–2025 · $700k · revenue +69%
- GSGEORGIA STATE SOCCER ASSN INC5× · 2020–2025 · $613k · revenue +7%
- UYUTAH YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION4× · 2020–2025 · $542k · revenue +73%
Funded once
- OSOHIO SOCCER ASSOCIATION INCone grant, 2024 · $175k · revenue -9%
- DSDOWN SYNDROME SPORTS OF AMERICA INCone grant, 2024 · $101k
- LCLegacy Connectionsgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $80k · revenue +248%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To foster the physical, mental and emotional growth and development of michigan's youth through the sport of soccer by providing the governing structure to administer youth soccer in the state of michigan and to provide information to…
Provide organized soccer for the youth in seattle
The national intercollegiate soccer officials association ("nisoa") is an organization of more than 4,500 soccer officials which trains, certifies, and provides qualified soccer referees for the college soccer community throughout the…
To work in service to soccer and ignite a national passion for the game. work with members, partners, donors, and board to grow awareness and participation of the game, through soccer everywhere, soccer success, and soccer investment.
Provide recreational soccer for children 3-14
The mission of the United Soccer Clubs (USC) is to provide an exceptional platform for youth soccer in South Texas. We aim to elevate the game of soccer by fostering player, coach, and referee development, promoting parent education,…
USA Soccer Inc provides unique opportunities for talented male and female youth athletes to train under the guidance of professional coaches committed to improving the quality of youth soccer.
Provides youth soccer development and amateur athletic competition through coaching, training and competition.
To improve and enhance the soccer environment in the greater southern utah area and provide programs that will provide a means for all player to achieve their individual soccer goals.
The competitive soccer league is present to the youth of sonoma from the ages 7-18 throughout the year. players must try out during the designated tryout period to be considered to be selected for the team. as competitve players are…
To provide the youth of Portland area communities with the opportunity to experience the joy and thrill of soccer in a player centered environment. The main focus is on FUN and DEVELOPMENT with age appropriate training and coaching where…
To provide all families a positive, healthy, progressive environment for youth development through soccer in our community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ohio Youth Soccer Association North and the most unlike its peers is National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
75 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 75 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE SOCCER ASSOC SOUTH ↗
- Who funds EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA YOUTH SOCCER A ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA STATE SOCCER ASSN INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN YOUTH SOCCER ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds UTAH YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds WYOMING SOCCER ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NEW JERSEY STATE YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES ADULT SOCCER ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MONTANA YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds OREGON YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON YOUTH SOCCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES ASSOCIATION OF BLIND ATHLETES INC ↗
- Who funds CEREBRAL PALSY SOCCER INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN AMPUTEE SOCCER ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS YOUTH SOCCER ASSOC INC ↗
- Who funds United States Youth Soccer Association Inc ↗
- Who funds KENTUCKY YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds COLORADO SOCCER ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTH TEXAS YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds INDIANA SOCCER ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds IOWA SOCCER ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH CAROLINA YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED SOCCER COACHES ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds United States Deaf Soccer Organization ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA STATE SOCCER ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ILLINOIS YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds IDAHO YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds OHIO SOCCER ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH TEXAS STATE SOCCER ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND STATE YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA ADULT SOCCER ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds MISSOURI YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COMPETITIVE SOCC SOCCER CLUBS D/B/A US CLUB SOCCER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United States Soccer Federation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.