Skip to content
United Fund of Stokes County Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

United Fund of Stokes County Inc

Providing assistance to organizations meeting the needs of stokes county citizens

$90k
Granted FY2023
8
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Human Services$233kHealth$127kPublic Safety & Disaster$57kYouth Development$57k
02FY2023 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $68,384, the rows itemized in this filing. The $89,808 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $21,424 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k6 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $26k
$7,644
Median grant
1
States reached
$72k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CANCER SERVICES$13,156
STOKES YMCA$12,542
STOKES TF ON$7,936
THE PARENTING PATH$7,644
SALVATION ARMY$7,000
STOKES 4-H$6,916
AMERICAN RED CROSS$6,638
TRELLIS SUPPORTIVE CARE$6,552
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $176k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 23% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%MTN VALLEY HOSPICE: $8k → 17%MTN VALLEY HOSPICE: $8k → 17%STOKES TF: $11k → 11%STOKES TF: $11k → 11%STOKES TF ON: $9k → 11%STOKES TF ON: $8k → 11%STOKES TF ON: $8k → 11%TRELLIS SUPPORTIVE CARE: $7k → 15%TRELLIS SUPPORTIVE CARE: $7k → 15%STOKES TF ON: $7k → 11%TRELLIS SUPPORTIVE CARE: $6k → 15%TRELLIS SUPPORTIVE CARE: $5k → 15%STOKES YMCA: $17k → 11%STOKES YMCA: $17k → 11%STOKES YMCA: $14k → 11%STOKES YMCA: $13k → 11%STOKES YMCA: $12k → 11%STOKES YMCA: $11k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$474k · 10 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
0

Total granted

$474k
$0

Still filing today

70%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CANCER SERVICES INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $86k · revenue +49%
  • YM
    Young Men's Christian Association of Northwest North Carolina (4626)
    7× · 2017–2023 · $83k · revenue +14%
  • YV
    YADKIN VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $53k · revenue +12%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    7/7
    Grantees still filing
    7/7
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    AMERICAN RED CROSS: $56,910 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSEXCHANGE CLUB CENTER FOR THE PREVENTION OF CHILD ABUSE OF NORTH CAROLINA INC: $50,736 · OtherEXCHANGE CLUB CENTER FOR THE PREVENTION OF CHIL…THE SALVATION ARMY: $46,602 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYSTOKES 4-H: $45,904 · OtherSTOKES 4-HYoung Men's Christian Association of Northwest North Carolina (4626): $83,001 · Human ServicesYoung Men's Christian Association of North…YADKIN VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT INC: $52,670 · Human ServicesYADKIN VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRIC…HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARECENTER: $25,488 · Human ServicesHOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARECENTERHospice of Surry County Inc: $15,200 · Human ServicesHospice of Surry County IncCANCER SERVICES INC: $86,000 · HealthCANCER SERVICES INCSURRY COUNTY FRIENDS OF YOUTH INCORPORATED: $11,000 · Youth Development
    Other$200,152Human Services$176,359Health$86,000Youth Development$11,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCANCER SERVICES INC: $86,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Northwest North Carolina (4626): $83,001 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetYADKIN VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT INC: $52,670 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetEXCHANGE CLUB CENTER FOR THE PREVENTION OF CHILD ABUSE OF NORTH CAROLINA INC: $50,736 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetHOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARECENTER: $25,488 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHospice of Surry County Inc: $15,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSURRY COUNTY FRIENDS OF YOUTH INCORPORATED: $11,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds CANCER SERVICES INC ↗
    • Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Northwest North Carolina (4626) ↗
    • Who funds YADKIN VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT INC ↗
    • Who funds EXCHANGE CLUB CENTER FOR THE PREVENTION OF CHILD ABUSE OF NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
    • Who funds HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARECENTER ↗
    • Who funds Hospice of Surry County Inc ↗
    • Who funds SURRY COUNTY FRIENDS OF YOUTH INCORPORATED ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Shallow Ford Foundati…The Cannon Foundation…United Fund of Surry …Pfefferkorn Foundatio…James G Hanes Memoria…Forsyth Memorial Hosp…Reynolds American Fou…The Blackbaud Giving …The Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
    Shallow Ford Foundation IncNC17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Shallow Ford Foundation Inc · The Cannon Foundation Inc · United Fund of Surry Inc · Pfefferkorn Foundation Inc · James G Hanes Memorial Fund · Forsyth Memorial Hospital Inc · Reynolds American Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization United Fund of Stokes County Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Fund of Stokes County Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $98k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on United Fund of Stokes County’s filings →

      More from the funding graph

      The unnamed billions
      grants reported with no recipient in the public record
      The regranting layer
      51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
      The DAF merry-go-round
      $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
      The endowment market
      who holds foundation money, and what just moved
      The camps
      funders cluster by geography, not ideology
      By state
      where grant money is based, and what stays home