Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ueland Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$553k
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.3MFood & Nutrition$866kPhilanthropy$395kHuman Services$226kHousing & Shelter$225kScience & Tech$200kEnvironment$148kReligion$122kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $138k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $364k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$100,000
EMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK$75,000
SO THEY CAN OVERSEAS AID FUND$69,261
THE SALVATION ARMY$60,000
THE TACOMA RESCUE MISSION$60,000
UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY$25,000
UNITED WAY OF PIERCE COUNTY$25,000
NORTHWEST HARVEST$25,000
GREAT PENINSULA CONSERVANCY$22,500
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF KING COUNTY$10,000
CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES$10,000
THE SUMBA FOUNDATION$10,000
FORTERRA$10,000
THE ALFRESCO COMMUNITY KITCHEN$6,596
KITSAP RESCUE MISSION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 76% of grant dollars ($2.8M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 24% that went abroad ($863k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%SOUTH KITSAP HELPLING: $5k → 10%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $5k → 10%ST VINCENT DEPAUL: $5k → 10%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $5k → 10%ST VINCENT DEPAUL: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 24% of all-years giving ($863k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Australia$863k · 35 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of Ueland Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Ueland Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 24% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 23 repeat orgs$134k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
11

Total granted

$2.7M
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+55%

Still filing today

52%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyEnvironmentHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NH
    NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM
    7× · 2017–2024 · $400k · revenue +1%
  • EF
    EMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $381k · revenue +34%
  • TR
    THE RESCUE MISSION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $220k · revenue +159%

Funded once

  • FC
    FORTERRA - CONSERVATION
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • KL
    KETA LEGACY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +55%
  • SO
    SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Port Angeles Food Bank

Nourishing our community. the port angeles food bank is the main food bank in clallam county, providing food to 13 other area pantries and meal programs as well as providing food to over 5,000 individuals per month.

Food & Nutrition
2
Snoqualmie Valley Food Bank

Our mission is to provide food and key resources to help our neighbors and community thrive. we lead the effort to feed, educated and advocate ending hunger in the snoqualmie valley and beyond.

Food & Nutrition
3
Food Lifeline

Food lifeline's mission is to feed people experiencing hunger today while working to end hunger tomorrow.

Food & Nutrition
4
Skagit Gleaners

Food recovery for low income families over 600 families served

—
5
Columbia Pacific Food Bank

Columbia pacific food bank is the regional food distribution center for columbia county, oregon and local food pantry for the community of saint helens.

Food & Nutrition
6
Renewal Food Bank

Renewal Food Bank provides food to needy and economically vulnerable individuals who live in Bellevue, Washington and surrounding communities

Human Services
7
West Seattle Food Bank

West Seattle Food Bank strengthens the community through the power of neighbors helping neighbors, working to ensure all in our community have access to the essential necessities of living.

Food & Nutrition
8
Kitsap Community Foundation

: a catalyst for the greater good. we partner with donors and others to invest in our region's nonprofit organizations to foster a more vibrant kitsap peninsula for the benefit of all.

Philanthropy
9
United Way of Snohomish County

United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.

Philanthropy
10
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
11
Sustainable Path Foundation

Sustainable Path Foundation promotes sustainability and health in the Puget Sound region through collaborative approaches informed by scientific understanding and systems thinking.

Social Science
12
Neighborhood Farmers Market Alliance

Neighborhood farmers market alliance's mission is to strengthen and support washington's small farms and farming families by providing effective direct sales sites and broadening access to seattle shoppers.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Emergency Food Network of Tacoma and Pierce County; the most unlike its peers is The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MONTE SANT' ANGELO FOUNDATION: $731,360 · OtherMONTE SANT' ANGELO FOUNDATIONNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $400,000 · OtherNORTHWEST HARVEST EMMTHE SALVATION ARMY: $130,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES: $80,000 · OtherSO THEY CAN OVERSEAS AID FUND: $69,261 · Other+24 more: $204,149 · Other+24 moreTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $772,500 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF…+1 more: $21,000 · EducationEMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY: $380,844 · Food & NutritionEMERGENCY FO…MAUI FOOD BANK INC: $30,000 · Food & NutritionMAUI FOOD BA…+1 more: $4,000 · Food & NutritionUNITED WAY OF PIERCE COUNTY: $200,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY O…UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY: $185,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY O…+1 more: $7,500 · PhilanthropyTHE RESCUE MISSION: $220,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterFORTERRA NW: $75,000 · EnvironmentGREAT PENINSULA CONSERVANCY: $57,100 · EnvironmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF KING COUNTY: $80,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,614,770Education$793,500Food & Nutrition$414,844Philanthropy$392,500Housing & Shelter$225,000Environment$132,100Recreation & Sports$80,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $772,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $400,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetEMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY: $380,844 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTHE RESCUE MISSION: $220,000 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetUNITED WAY OF PIERCE COUNTY: $200,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY: $185,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF KING COUNTY: $80,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFORTERRA NW: $75,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetGREAT PENINSULA CONSERVANCY: $57,100 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $30,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBremerton Foodline: $25,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $21,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT FRANCES CABRINI CHARITABLE SERVICES: $20,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetSUMBA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKETA LEGACY FOUNDATION: $5,920 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetSOUTH KITSAP HELPLINE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKITSAP RESCUE MISSION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCentral Kitsap Food Bank: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM ↗
  • Who funds EMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds THE RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF PIERCE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF KING COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds FORTERRA NW ↗
  • Who funds GREAT PENINSULA CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA ↗
  • Who funds MAUI FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds Bremerton Foodline ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAINT FRANCES CABRINI CHARITABLE SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds SUMBA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KETA LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH KITSAP HELPLINE ↗
  • Who funds KITSAP RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds Central Kitsap Food Bank ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kitsap Community FoundationWA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kitsap Community Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Fred H & Mary S Dore Charitable Foundation · First Fed Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Kitsap Credit Union · United Way of Kitsap County · The Russell Family Foundation · Give Back Foundation · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ueland Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ueland Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ueland’s filings →

    More from the funding graph