Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Community foundation

Kitsap Community Foundation

: a catalyst for the greater good.

$2.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
63
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$205k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Human Services$2.4MEducation$1.8MEnvironment$1.4MReligion$989kFood & Nutrition$695kHealth$499kArts & Culture$425kPhilanthropy$368kOther$0
02FY2024 · 63 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 63 grants below total $1,341,459 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,069,872 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $728,413 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k29 grants · $195k
  • $10k–50k29 grants · $557k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $590k
$10,937
Median grant
4
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF KITSAP COUNTY$205,378
KITSAP COMMUNITY RESOURCES$202,404
BREMERTON WESTSOUND SYMPHONY$66,561
GREAT PENINSULA CONSERVANCY$59,217
TACO BELL FOUNDATION INC$56,100
YMCA KITSAP COUNTY$46,712
PORT ORCHARD ROTARY FOUNDATION$42,293
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION$37,000
MULTICARE HEALTH FOUNDATION$32,500
CULTURAL ARTS FOUNDATION NORTHWEST$29,857
KITSAP HOMES OF COMPASSION$26,662
SOUTH KITSAP HELPLINE$25,764
FISHLINE FOOD BANK & COMPREHENSIVE SERVICES$25,010
SALVATION ARMY$21,796
KITSAP IMMIGRANT ASSISTANCE CENTER$21,560
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOLLY RIDGE CENTER: $22k → 10%HOLLY RIDGE CENTER: $22k → 10%HOLLY RIDGE CENTER: $21k → 10%CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES: $17k → 10%EASTSIDE BABY CORNER: $15k → 9%SOUTH KITSAP HELPLINE: $26k → 10%SOUTH KITSAP HELPLINE: $21k → 10%SOUTH KITSAP HELPLINE: $15k → 10%SOUTH KITSAP HELPLINE: $15k → 10%SOUTH KITSAP HELPLINE: $14k → 10%SOUTH KITSAP HELPLINE: $13k → 10%BAINBRIDGE ISLAND SENIOR COMMUNITY CENTER: $120k → 10%ISLAND TIME ACTIVITIES: $40k → 10%HELPLINE HOUSE: $19k → 10%BAINBRIDGE ISLAND SENIOR COMMUNITY CENTER: $12k → 10%HELPLINE HOUSE: $12k → 10%BAINBRIDGE YOUTH SERVICES: $12k → 10%NEW LIFE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY: $306k → 10%NEW LIFE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY: $268k → 10%THE COFFEE OASIS: $210k → 10%KITSAP COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $202k → 10%THE COFFEE OASIS: $82k → 10%THE COFFEE OASIS: $74k → 10%THE COFFEE OASIS: $72k → 10%BREMERTON WESTSOUND SYMPHONY: $67k → 10%KITSAP COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $64k → 10%BREMERTON WESTSOUND SYMPHONY: $45k → 10%BREMERTON WESTSOUND SYMPHONY: $44k → 10%KITSAP IMMIGRANT ASSISTANCE CENTER: $39k → 10%SCARLET ROAD: $37k → 10%NEW LIFE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY: $32k → 10%BREMERTON WESTSOUND SYMPHONY: $31k → 10%THE COFFEE OASIS: $26k → 10%SCARLET ROAD: $25k → 10%NEW LIFE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY: $25k → 10%KITSAP IMMIGRANT ASSISTANCE CENTER: $22k → 10%COFFEE OASIS: $19k → 10%NEW LIFE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY: $15k → 10%KITSAP COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $12k → 10%FISHLINE FOOD BANK & COMPREHENSIVE SERVICES: $81k → 10%KITSAP COUNTY FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION: $73k → 10%YMCA OF PIERCE & KITSAP COUNTIES: $12k → 10%FISHLINE FOOD BANK & COMPREHENSIVE SERVICES: $25k → 10%NORTH KITSAP FISHLINE: $20k → 10%NORTH KITSAP FISHLINE: $20k → 10%FISHLINE FOOD BANK & COMPREHENSIVE SERVICES: $18k → 10%FISHLINE FOOD BANK & COMPREHENSIVE SERVICES: $16k → 10%FISHLINE FOOD BANK & COMPREHENSIVE SERVICES: $14k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ND
NY
CA
NE
KY
TN
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.1M · 81 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

81 repeat relationships — 44 still active in FY2024, 37 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

81
56

Total granted

$8.1M
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+17%

Still filing today

73%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $219k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE COFFEE OASIS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $500k · revenue +76%
  • GP
    GREAT PENINSULA CONSERVANCY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $475k · revenue +489%
  • KC
    KITSAP COMMUNITY RESOURCES
    3× · 2019–2024 · $287k · revenue +108%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $388k
  • FN
    FORTERRA NW
    one grant, 2018 · $250k · revenue -12%
  • N
    NEARZERO
    one grant, 2017 · $109k · revenue -100% · 35% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kitsap Legal Services

Providing and facilitating access to justice in kitsap county for low-income individuals or marginalized communities through advocacy and free civil legal services.

Crime & Legal
2
King County Sexual Assault Resource Center

KCSARC is the largest and most comprehensive non-profit provider of sexual assault services in King County and Washington State. Our vision is a community free of sexual violence. Our mission is to: give voice to victims, their families,…

—
3
Kirkland Arts Center

Cultivating quality arts experiences, connecting communities, and increasing creative engagement.

Arts & Culture
4
Olympic Peninsula Community Clinic

Improving the quality of life for the people in the Olympic Peninsula Community by providing increased access to health and wellness services for the underserved

Health
5
United Way of Snohomish County

United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.

Philanthropy
6
The Community Foundation of South Puget Sound

To grow a lasting culture of generosity and well-being in the South Puget Sound through connection, leadership, and investment.

Philanthropy
7
Tenino Community Service Center

Tenino Community Service Center/Tenino Food Bank Plus is a deep-rooted community-based service center dedicated to feeding those within the Tenino school district (Tenino and Bucoda) that may be disadvantaged. In addition, it is our…

Food & Nutrition
8
Kitsap Sexual Assault Center

The mission of kitsap sexual assault center is to provide guidance and empowerment, without prejudice, to those impacted by sexual assault and violent crimes through ethical and compassionate advocacy and therapeutic services.

—
9
Sustainable Path Foundation

Sustainable Path Foundation promotes sustainability and health in the Puget Sound region through collaborative approaches informed by scientific understanding and systems thinking.

Social Science
10
Bike Works Seattle

Bike Works promotes the bicycle as a vehicle for change to empower youth and build resilient communities.

Recreation & Sports
11
Kittitas Conservation Trust

Protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat, open space, cultural and recreational resources, and scenic views in the Upper Yakima River Basin.

Education
12
Community Foundation of Snohomish County

The Community Foundation of Snohomish County (the Foundation) is a nonprofit, tax-exempt organization incorporated under the laws of the State of Washington. The Foundation serves as a community foundation, supporting a broad spectrum of…

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kitsap Rescue Mission and the most unlike its peers is Surviving Changer. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyRegional Business & Communi…Private Membership ClubsFamily Philanthropic Founda…Youth Sports LeaguesRegional Museums & Historic…Washington State Advocacy O…International Development A…Youth Mentoring & Developme…Animal Rescue & Shelter Ser…College Foundation SupportImmigrant and Ethnic Commun…Senior Residential CareFood Banks and Emergency As…Faith-Based Healthcare Syst…Regional Conservation & Env…Independent Elementary Scho…Early Childhood Development…Live Performance Arts Organ…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr15%11%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr19%32%20–35yr12%23%35–55yr12%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr15%5%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr19%55%20–35yr12%21%35–55yr12%8%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%3/147
the rest of the field
13%
1,867/14,068

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

114 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 114 of the 156 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
35
Early backer (in before they grew)
110/114
Grantees still filing
69/114
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BREMERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT — $1,022,200 · OtherBREMERTON SCHOOL DISTRICTKINGSTON CHRISTIAN CHURCH — $821,523 · OtherKINGSTON CHRISTIAN CHURCHIndividual grant recipient — $387,522 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+91 more — $2,776,012 · Other+91 moreNEW LIFE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $655,609 · Human ServicesNEW LIFE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT…THE COFFEE OASIS — $500,475 · Human ServicesTHE COFFEE OASISKITSAP COMMUNITY RESOURCES — $287,276 · Human ServicesKITSAP COMMUNITY RESOURCESNORTH KITSAP FISHLINE — $274,248 · Human ServicesNORTH KITSAP FISHLINEBainbridge Youth Services — $203,756 · Human ServicesBainbridge Youth ServicesBAINBRIDGE ISLAND SENIOR COMMUNITY CENTER — $138,007 · Human ServicesSOUTH KITSAP HELPLINE — $114,095 · Human ServicesKITSAP IMMIGRANT ASSISTANCE CENTER — $90,720 · Human Services+18 more — $438,898 · Human Services+18 moreGREAT PENINSULA CONSERVANCY — $475,085 · EnvironmentGREAT PEN…FORTERRA NW — $250,000 · EnvironmentFORTERRA …KITSAP AUDUBON SOCIETY — $64,085 · EnvironmentKITSAP AU…+1 more — $10,000 · EnvironmentUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION — $114,438 · EducationKITSAP REGIONAL LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $92,376 · EducationSILVERWOOD SCHOOL — $80,299 · EducationLEADERSHIP KITSAP FOUNDATION — $60,380 · EducationVOICES OF PACIFIC ISLAND NATIONS - VPIN FETU TAIALA — $30,000 · EducationThe Island School — $17,064 · Education+3 more — $29,196 · EducationVILLAGE GREEN FOUNDATION — $255,500 · Community ImprovementEXECUTIVE SERVICE CORPS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $50,000 · Community ImprovementTHE KNIGHTS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL EQUIPMENT LEND PROGRAM SERVICES — $13,724 · Community ImprovementISLAND VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS — $12,026 · Community Improvement+1 more — $6,000 · Community ImprovementUNITED WAY OF KITSAP COUNTY — $249,178 · PhilanthropyBAINBRIDGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $40,000 · PhilanthropyKITSAP COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $26,745 · Philanthropy+2 more — $15,391 · PhilanthropyMARY BRIDGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $105,600 · HealthPENINSULA COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES — $36,000 · HealthMULTICARE FOUNDATIONS — $32,500 · HealthOLIVE CREST — $31,250 · HealthWEST SOUND TREATMENT CENTER — $22,525 · HealthSMOKETOWN FAMILY WELLNESS CENTER CORP — $20,000 · HealthBEST DENTAL HELP — $10,052 · Health+6 more — $43,362 · Health
Other$5,007,257Human Services$2,703,084Environment$799,170Education$423,753Community Improvement$337,250Philanthropy$331,314Health$301,289

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEW LIFE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $655,609 over 5y, 36% of budgetTHE COFFEE OASIS — $500,475 over 8y, 8.1% of budgetGREAT PENINSULA CONSERVANCY — $475,085 over 7y, 5.3% of budgetKITSAP COMMUNITY RESOURCES — $287,276 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNORTH KITSAP FISHLINE — $274,248 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetVILLAGE GREEN FOUNDATION — $255,500 over 3y, 46% of budgetFORTERRA NW — $250,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetUNITED WAY OF KITSAP COUNTY — $249,178 over 4y, 27% of budgetBainbridge Youth Services — $203,756 over 4y, 12% of budgetBAINBRIDGE ISLAND SENIOR COMMUNITY CENTER — $138,007 over 3y, 31% of budgetPORT ORCHARD ROTARY FOUNDATION CO TODD EGGERS CPA — $127,003 over 5y, 34% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION — $114,438 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH KITSAP HELPLINE — $114,095 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetSAINT VINCENT DE PAUL CONFERENCE OF OUR LADY STAR — $110,360 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetNEARZERO — $108,900 over 1y, 35% of budgetMARY BRIDGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $105,600 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetKITSAP REGIONAL LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $92,376 over 6y, 7.3% of budgetKITSAP IMMIGRANT ASSISTANCE CENTER — $90,720 over 6y, 4.9% of budgetBremerton Foodline — $88,596 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetHOLLY RIDGE CENTER — $82,142 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSILVERWOOD SCHOOL — $80,299 over 1y, 11% of budgetCentral Kitsap Food Bank — $79,413 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetSCARLET ROAD — $72,000 over 3y, 8.7% of budgetSharenet Food Bank — $69,914 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetKITSAP AUDUBON SOCIETY — $64,085 over 5y, 48% of budgetLEADERSHIP KITSAP FOUNDATION — $60,380 over 5y, 13% of budgetOUR GEMS — $60,292 over 4y, 16% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $59,033 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetHELPLINE HOUSE — $56,552 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTACO BELL FOUNDATION INC — $56,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPORT GAMBLE S'KLALLAM FOUNDATION — $54,882 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetNORTH MASON FOOD BANK — $53,203 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetKITSAP HOMES OF COMPASSION — $52,162 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetTown Hall Association — $51,750 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetEXECUTIVE SERVICE CORPS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $50,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetKITSAP HUMANE SOCIETY — $42,924 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBAINBRIDGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetISLAND TIME ACTIVITIES — $40,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetPATH — $37,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS IN CONCERT INC — $37,000 over 3y, 8.0% of budgetPENINSULA COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES — $36,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKIDVANTAGE — $35,775 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPeninsula Alliance — $35,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetBREMERTON SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $32,878 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetMULTICARE FOUNDATIONS — $32,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBREMERTON SERVICES ASSOCIATION — $32,098 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetDISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER OF KITSAP — $31,569 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetOLIVE CREST — $31,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW LIFE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE COFFEE OASIS ↗
  • Who funds GREAT PENINSULA CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds KITSAP COMMUNITY RESOURCES ↗
  • Who funds NORTH KITSAP FISHLINE ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGE GREEN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FORTERRA NW ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF KITSAP COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Bainbridge Youth Services ↗
  • Who funds BAINBRIDGE ISLAND SENIOR COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PORT ORCHARD ROTARY FOUNDATION CO TODD EGGERS CPA ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH KITSAP HELPLINE ↗
  • Who funds SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL CONFERENCE OF OUR LADY STAR ↗
  • Who funds NEARZERO ↗
  • Who funds MARY BRIDGE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KITSAP REGIONAL LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KITSAP IMMIGRANT ASSISTANCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Bremerton Foodline ↗
  • Who funds HOLLY RIDGE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SILVERWOOD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Central Kitsap Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds SCARLET ROAD ↗
  • Who funds Sharenet Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds KITSAP AUDUBON SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds LEADERSHIP KITSAP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OUR GEMS ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds HELPLINE HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds TACO BELL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PORT GAMBLE S'KLALLAM FOUNDATION ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

One Call for AllBainbridge Community …First Fed FoundationPuget Sound Energy Fo…Seattle FoundationThe Norcliffe Foundat…Rotary Club of Bainbr…Mightycause Charitabl…Kitsap Credit UnionThe Russell Family Fo…Medina FoundationArcharios Foundation
One Call for AllWA66.9× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: One Call for All · Bainbridge Community Foundation · First Fed Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Seattle Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Rotary Club of Bainbridge Island Trust · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Kitsap Credit Union · The Russell Family Foundation · Medina Foundation · Archarios Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kitsap Community Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    49report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 156 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home