Skip to content

· Public charity

Uc Healthcare System

UC HEALTHCARE SYSTEM is the sole member of uc health, llc, whose purpose is transforming health and improving life.

$73M
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$72M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$465MHealth$5.5MCommunity Improvement$2.8MPhilanthropy$680kHousing & Shelter$404kHuman Services$383kArts & Culture$140kPublic Benefit$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $350k
  • $250k+2 grants · $72M
$100,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.9B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI$72,181,897
UPTOWN CONSORTIUM INC$290,000
CENTER FOR CLOSING THE HEALTH GAP$200,000
CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER$100,000
UNITED WAY OF GREATER CINCINNATI$50,000
BUTLER COUNTY UNITED WAY$25,250
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $373k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Cincinnati Marathon Inc: $15k → 16%Urban League of Greater Cincinnati: $75k → 16%URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $75k → 16%Urban League of Greater Cincinnati: $58k → 16%Urban League of Greater Cincinnati: $55k → 16%Urban League of Greater Cincinnati: $55k → 16%Living Arrangements for the Developmentally Disabled Inc: $15k → 16%YWCA OF GREATER CINCINNATI: $25k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$474M · 15 repeat orgs$840k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
22

Total granted

$474M
$815k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+56%

Still filing today

87%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    UPTOWN CONSORTIUM INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.6M · revenue +135%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR RESPITE CARE INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $981k · revenue +359%
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $775k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • CF
    CITIZENS FOR THE HEALTH SAFETY NET
    one grant, 2023 · $250k
  • HC
    Hamilton County Narcan Distibution Collaborative
    one grant, 2018 · $150k
  • CO
    Cincinnati Opera Association Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $90k · revenue +45%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cincinnati Usa Regional Chamber

To grow the vibrancy and economic prosperity of the cincinnati region.

—
2
Columbus Community Clinical Oncology Program

Our mission is to deliver state-of-the-art cancer care to patients in their communities through clinical trials. this allows individuals to remain in their won neighborhoods, while receiving the latest and best in cancer screenings,…

—
3
OhioHealth Corporation Group Return

To improve the health of those we serve.

Health
4
Cincinnati Shoulder and Elbow Research and Education Foundation Inc
Health
5
Uc Health Foundation

Uc health foundation is the fundraising entity of the uc healthcare system. our mission is to support groundbreaking work that takes place across the academic health center to provide the best in prevention, treatment, education and…

Health
6
Cincinnati Usa Regional Chamber Foundation

To develop and promote economic development, talent initiatives and the unique offerings in the cincinnati region.

Community Improvement
7
Greater Columbus Chamber of Commerce

Advancing a thriving central ohio commmunity by serving as a catalyst for all businesses to grow and flourish. our mission pillars are connections, government relations, strategic business solutions and talent/workforce.

—
8
University of Cincinnati Physicians Inc

Ucp organizes, manages, and delivers the clinical activities and professional medical services of the faculty of the university of cincinnati college of medicine.

—
9
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
10
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
11
Physicians Care Connection

Physicians careconnection (pcc) mission is to optimize health for individuals experiencing healthcare challenges due to personal and systemic barriers.

—
12
Ohio Chamber of Commerce

As the state's leading business advocate and resource, the ohio chamber of commerce aggressively champions free enterprise, economic competitiveness and growth for the benefit of all ohioans.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Urban League of Greater Southwestern Ohio Inc; the most unlike its peers is Women Walking West. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/35
Grantees still filing
23/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI: $464,708,631 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI+13 more: $567,049 · OtherCENTER FOR CLOSING THE HEALTH GAP IN GREATER CINCINNATI: $1,800,000 · HealthCENTER FOR RESPITE CARE INC: $981,000 · HealthVillage Life Outreach Project Inc: $912,085 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $599,825 · Health+8 more: $339,850 · HealthUPTOWN CONSORTIUM INC: $2,623,875 · Community Improvement+2 more: $81,060 · Community ImprovementTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $775,357 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of Greater Cincinnati: $654,383 · PhilanthropyURBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER SOUTHWESTERN OHIO INC: $317,855 · Human ServicesYWCA of Greater Cincinnati: $25,000 · Human ServicesLiving Arrangements for the Developmentally Disabled Inc: $15,000 · Human ServicesPIG WORKS INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesCincinnati Opera Association Inc: $90,000 · Arts & CultureCincinnati Institute of Fine Arts: $50,000 · Arts & CultureAVONDALE COMMUNITY COUNCIL: $20,000 · Public Benefit
Other$465,275,680Health$4,632,760Community Improvement$2,704,935Philanthropy$1,429,740Human Services$372,855Arts & Culture$140,000Public Benefit$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUPTOWN CONSORTIUM INC: $2,623,875 over 9y, 15% of budgetCENTER FOR CLOSING THE HEALTH GAP IN GREATER CINCINNATI: $1,800,000 over 7y, 31% of budgetCENTER FOR RESPITE CARE INC: $981,000 over 6y, 20% of budgetVillage Life Outreach Project Inc: $912,085 over 8y, 93% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $775,357 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Cincinnati: $654,383 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $599,825 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER SOUTHWESTERN OHIO INC: $317,855 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $107,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCincinnati Opera Association Inc: $90,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE HEALTH COLLABORATIVE: $88,200 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOVIBRANT: $65,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetCincinnati Institute of Fine Arts: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBUTLER COUNTY UNITED WAY: $25,250 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetYWCA of Greater Cincinnati: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUSO OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON-BALTIMORE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE HEALTHCARE CONNECTION INC: $23,355 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Inc: $22,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLiving Arrangements for the Developmentally Disabled Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPIG WORKS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetACS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY I INC: $10,500 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetOHIO PROFESSIONALS HEALTH PROGRAM: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMortar Cincinnati: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOHIO CANCER RESEARCH ASSOCIATES: $9,250 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWomen Walking West: $7,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetLifeCenter Organ Donor Network: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Greater Cincinnati and Northern Kentucky African American Chamber of Co: $6,861 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHispanic Chamber Cincinnati USA Inc: $6,060 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetUPSPRING: $5,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH29.1× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Children's Hospital Medical Center · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · Interact for Health · Duke Energy Foundation · United Way of Greater Cincinnati · The Christ Hospital · Bethesda Inc · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Bethesda Hospital Inc · The Good Samaritan Hospital of Cincinnati Ohio · Lkc Family Foundation Fka - Lkc Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Uc Healthcare System funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Uc Healthcare System. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Uc Healthcare System’s filings →

    More from the funding graph