Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ubuntu Kdce Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$186kHousing & Shelter$63kInternational$47kRecreation & Sports$20kHuman Services$20kPhilanthropy$20kHealth$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$605k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NAMBALE MAGNET SCHOOL$20,000
CHIKUMBUSO$5,000
THE DREAM PROGRAM$5,000
LIBERATION PROGRAMS INC$5,000
HORIZONS-NORWALK COMMUNITY COLLEGE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
CAMP BLUE SKIES FOUNDATION$2,500
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CAMP BLUE SKIES FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%CAMP BLUE SKIES FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%CAMP BLUE SKIES FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%CAMP BLUE SKIES FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%CAMP BLUE SKIES FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%CAMP BLUE SKIES FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%CAMP BLUE SKIES FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%CAMP BLUE SKIES FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%CARVER FOUNDATION OF NORWALK: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$344k · 9 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +132% since the first grant, against +100% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$344k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+132%
+100%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesInternationalHealthYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HA
    Horizons at CT State Norwalk Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $38k · revenue +163%
  • TD
    THE DREAM PROGRAM INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $35k · revenue +303%
  • TO
    THE OPEN DOOR SHELTER INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $28k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • WI
    WIKS-USA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +100%
  • CP
    CORNERSTONE PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2018 · $4k · revenue -89%
  • DH
    DAVID'S HOUSE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +223%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Residences Inc

Housing and programs for persons with intellectual disabilities.

Human Services
2
Cold Spring School Inc

Cold spring school challenges children to become self-reliant, curious and resourceful problem solvers with the academic and social skills to engage constructively and ethically in our diverse, changing world.

Education
3
The Connecticut Project Inc

The connecticut project, a 501c3 organization, brings together people, ideas, and resources to build opportunity.

Community Improvement
4
Camp Casco Inc

Camp Casco builds community for families affected by childhood cancer in New England through free camps and social opportunities.

Recreation & Sports
5
Marrakech Inc

Provides person-centered and inclusive services to children and adults with and without disabilities that includes securing employment, connecting to necessary supportive services, accessing housing and participating fully as contributing…

Employment
6
Homeward Bound Inc

Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.

Human Services
7
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
8
The Oliverian School Inc

Oliverian is a non-profit, alternative, college-prep boarding school for adolescents who have not thrived in traditional settings. we fill the gap between traditional and therapeutic schools, providing the right mix of support and guided…

Education
9
Darrow School

Darrow school is dedicated to serving students with diverse backgrounds and abilities, building on each student's talents and interests to inspire enduring confidence for success in college and life. this mission is accomplished through…

Education
10
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

—
11
Residential Opportunities Inc

We partner with children and adults with disabilities and their families so they may live more meaningful, healthy, and independent lives in their homes and communities.

Human Services
12
Christel House International Inc

Chi prepares graduates of the christel house schools operated by its affiliated entities, which chi funds and oversees, to achieve upward economic mobility, demonstrate good citizenship, and become empowered to identify and realize their…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Dream Program Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cornerstone Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NAMBALE MAGNET SCHOOL: $144,300 · OtherNAMBALE MAGNET SCHOOLCHIKUMBUSO: $34,400 · OtherCHIKUMBUSORONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $20,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE+1 more: $2,500 · OtherHorizons at CT State Norwalk Inc: $37,500 · EducationHorizons at …CORNERSTONE PROJECT INC: $3,700 · EducationCORNERSTONE …THE DREAM PROGRAM INC: $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE DREAM …THE OPEN DOOR SHELTER INC: $27,500 · Housing & ShelterCamp Blue Skies Foundation: $20,000 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesPERSON TO PERSON INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyWIKS-USA INC: $8,000 · InternationalBUILDON INC: $5,000 · InternationalLIBERATION PROGRAMS INC: $5,000 · HealthDAVID'S HOUSE INC: $1,000 · Health
Other$201,200Education$41,200Youth Development$35,000Housing & Shelter$27,500Human Services$20,500Philanthropy$20,000International$13,000Health$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHorizons at CT State Norwalk Inc: $37,500 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetTHE DREAM PROGRAM INC: $35,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetTHE OPEN DOOR SHELTER INC: $27,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCamp Blue Skies Foundation: $20,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetPERSON TO PERSON INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWIKS-USA INC: $8,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetBUILDON INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERATION PROGRAMS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORNERSTONE PROJECT INC: $3,700 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetDAVID'S HOUSE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CARVER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Horizons at CT State Norwalk Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE DREAM PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE OPEN DOOR SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Camp Blue Skies Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PERSON TO PERSON INC ↗
  • Who funds WIKS-USA INC ↗
  • Who funds BUILDON INC ↗
  • Who funds LIBERATION PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds DAVID'S HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CARVER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC9.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ubuntu Kdce Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ubuntu Kdce Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 16%
  • The Dream Program Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Liberation Programs Inc: 24% of income from government
  • The Carver Inc: 16% of income from government
  • The Open Door Shelter Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Person to Person Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ubuntu Kdce’s filings →

More from the funding graph