Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ubuntu Kdce Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$186kHousing & Shelter$63kInternational$47kRecreation & Sports$20kHuman Services$20kPhilanthropy$20kHealth$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$605k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NAMBALE MAGNET SCHOOL$20,000
THE DREAM PROGRAM$5,000
LIBERATION PROGRAMS INC$5,000
HORIZONS-NORWALK COMMUNITY COLLEGE$5,000
CHIKUMBUSO$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$2,500
CAMP BLUE SKIES FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CAMP BLUE SKIES FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%CAMP BLUE SKIES FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%CAMP BLUE SKIES FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%CAMP BLUE SKIES FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%CAMP BLUE SKIES FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%CAMP BLUE SKIES FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%CAMP BLUE SKIES FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%CAMP BLUE SKIES FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%CARVER FOUNDATION OF NORWALK: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$344k · 9 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$344k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+98%
+100%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesInternationalHealthYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HA
    Horizons at CT State Norwalk Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $38k · revenue +163%
  • TD
    THE DREAM PROGRAM INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $35k · revenue +303%
  • TO
    THE OPEN DOOR SHELTER INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $28k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • WI
    WIKS-USA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +100%
  • CP
    CORNERSTONE PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2018 · $4k · revenue -89%
  • DH
    DAVID'S HOUSE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +223%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Residences Inc

Housing and programs for persons with intellectual disabilities.

Human Services
2
Cold Spring School Inc

Cold spring school challenges children to become self-reliant, curious and resourceful problem solvers with the academic and social skills to engage constructively and ethically in our diverse, changing world.

Education
3
The Connecticut Project Inc

The connecticut project, a 501c3 organization, brings together people, ideas, and resources to build opportunity.

Community Improvement
4
Camp Casco Inc

Camp Casco builds community for families affected by childhood cancer in New England through free camps and social opportunities.

Recreation & Sports
5
Marrakech Inc

Provides person-centered and inclusive services to children and adults with and without disabilities that includes securing employment, connecting to necessary supportive services, accessing housing and participating fully as contributing…

Employment
6
Homeward Bound Inc

Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.

Human Services
7
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
8
The Oliverian School Inc

Oliverian is a non-profit, alternative, college-prep boarding school for adolescents who have not thrived in traditional settings. we fill the gap between traditional and therapeutic schools, providing the right mix of support and guided…

Education
9
Darrow School

Darrow school is dedicated to serving students with diverse backgrounds and abilities, building on each student's talents and interests to inspire enduring confidence for success in college and life. this mission is accomplished through…

Education
10
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

11
Residential Opportunities Inc

We partner with children and adults with disabilities and their families so they may live more meaningful, healthy, and independent lives in their homes and communities.

Human Services
12
Christel House International Inc

Chi prepares graduates of the christel house schools operated by its affiliated entities, which chi funds and oversees, to achieve upward economic mobility, demonstrate good citizenship, and become empowered to identify and realize their…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Dream Program Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cornerstone Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NAMBALE MAGNET SCHOOL — $144,300 · OtherNAMBALE MAGNET SCHOOLCHIKUMBUSO — $34,400 · OtherCHIKUMBUSORONALD MCDONALD HOUSE — $20,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE+1 more — $2,500 · OtherHorizons at CT State Norwalk Inc — $37,500 · EducationHorizons at …CORNERSTONE PROJECT INC — $3,700 · EducationCORNERSTONE …THE DREAM PROGRAM INC — $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE DREAM …THE OPEN DOOR SHELTER INC — $27,500 · Housing & ShelterCamp Blue Skies Foundation — $20,000 · Human Services+1 more — $500 · Human ServicesPERSON TO PERSON INC — $20,000 · PhilanthropyWIKS-USA INC — $8,000 · InternationalBUILDON INC — $5,000 · InternationalLIBERATION PROGRAMS INC — $5,000 · HealthDAVID'S HOUSE INC — $1,000 · Health
Other$201,200Education$41,200Youth Development$35,000Housing & Shelter$27,500Human Services$20,500Philanthropy$20,000International$13,000Health$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHorizons at CT State Norwalk Inc — $37,500 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetTHE DREAM PROGRAM INC — $35,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetTHE OPEN DOOR SHELTER INC — $27,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCamp Blue Skies Foundation — $20,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetPERSON TO PERSON INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWIKS-USA INC — $8,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetBUILDON INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERATION PROGRAMS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORNERSTONE PROJECT INC — $3,700 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetDAVID'S HOUSE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CARVER INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Horizons at CT State Norwalk Inc
  • Who funds THE DREAM PROGRAM INC
  • Who funds THE OPEN DOOR SHELTER INC
  • Who funds Camp Blue Skies Foundation
  • Who funds PERSON TO PERSON INC
  • Who funds WIKS-USA INC
  • Who funds BUILDON INC
  • Who funds LIBERATION PROGRAMS INC
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE PROJECT INC
  • Who funds DAVID'S HOUSE INC
  • Who funds THE CARVER INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC9.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ubuntu Kdce Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 16%
  • The Dream Program Inc100% of income from government
  • Liberation Programs Inc24% of income from government
  • The Carver Inc16% of income from government
  • The Open Door Shelter Inc14% of income from government
  • Person to Person Inc5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph