· Public charity
Uab Medicine Enterprise
To provide common management of the existing and future healthcare delivery operations (the "joint healthcare operations") of the board of trustees of the university of alabama and the university of alabama health services foundation, p.c.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 16 grants below total $18,984,407 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $19,450,599 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $466,192 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k8 grants · $117k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $381k
- $250k+3 grants · $18M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UA HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION | $13,065,445 |
| UAB EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION | $3,072,000 |
| UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL | $2,349,162 |
| Talledega Superspeedway LLC | $127,800 |
| UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM | $98,000 |
| Vestavia Hills Soccer Club | $55,000 |
| Birmingham Legion FC | $50,000 |
| Transplant Life Foundation | $50,000 |
| LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA SOCIETY | $20,000 |
| AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY | $19,000 |
| MIKE SLIVE FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| Alabama Impact Alliance | $15,000 |
| BREAST CANCER RESEARCH | $15,000 |
| Teall Properties Group | $12,000 |
| O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer | $11,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–20, $78k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
26 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $205k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION PC8× · 2017–2024 · $82M · revenue +83%
- UEUAB EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $25M · revenue +60% · 41% of their budget
- AHAmerican Heart Association Inc4× · 2017–2023 · $103k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA BIRMINGHAMone grant, 2018 · $87k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM GIFT RECORDSone grant, 2021 · $67k
- ICIMG COLLEGE LLCone grant, 2021 · $62k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Urology Health Foundation is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization founded in 2003 by Birmingham urologist Dr. Thomas E. Moody. Its purposes are to educate physicians and other medical professionals in new techniques and procedures being…
To further the image of medicine through financial support for health education programs and projects
The university foundation is organized to assist and aid the board of trustees of the university of alabama in fulfilling its educational, research, and public service programs and activities.
None
Serve kidney patients in Alabama by providing financial assistance, patient education, and support. Provide education and public awareness of causes and prevention of disease, as well as opportunity for organ donation. Provide support via…
Aids alabama devotes its energy and resources statewide to helping people with hiv/aids live healthy, independent lives and works to prevent the spread of hiv.
The alabama public health association, inc., is an association of individuals and organizations interested in public health in alabama. the mission of the association is to link individuals and organizations in addressing public health…
Support the research activities of the university of mississippi medical center
To promote the preservation and continued development of commercial banking in alabama.
The ba foundation is a not for profit organization committed to spreading awareness about desmoplastic small round cell tumors (dsrct) and raising money for research and clinical trials.
Georgia alliance for breast cancer mission is to engage with georgia's breast cancer community to increase access to care and reduce disparities in cancer outcomes.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Uab Educational Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION PC ↗
- Who funds UAB EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Deep South Cancer Foundation ↗
- Who funds BIRMINGHAM EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST VINCENT'S FOUNDATION OF ALABAMA INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds VESTAVIA HILLS SOCCER CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds MEDICAL FOUNDATION OF JEFFERSON COUNTY ↗
- Who funds ALABAMA SYMPHONIC ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds OPERA BIRMINGHAM INC ↗
- Who funds The Mike Slive Foundation for Prostate Cancer Research ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds TRANSPLANT LIFE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF ALA ↗
- Who funds LAKESHORE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Alabama Impact Alliance ↗
- Who funds BUSINESS COUNCIL OF ALABAMA ↗
- Who funds RUSSELL HOSPITAL CORPORATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Robert R Meyer Foundation · Susan Mott Webb Charitable Trust · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Uab Medicine Enterprise funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.