Skip to content

· Private foundation

Turner Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$98k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$197kAnimals$135kYouth Development$82kHealth$60kHuman Services$27kReligion$22kFood & Nutrition$7kCrime & Legal$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $75k
$4,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL DAY SCHOOL$34,500
WAYSIDE WAFS$10,000
KU ENDOWMENT$10,000
PAWSPERITY - FKA THE GROOMING PROJECT$10,000
CHILDREN'S MERCY$10,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER KANSAS CITY$6,000
ST TERESA'S ACADEMY$5,250
VILLAGE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$4,000
HARVESTERS$2,500
ABILITY KC$2,000
MUSEUM AT PRARIE FIRE$1,000
BABY2BABY$1,000
BOYSGROW CORP$500
UNCORNERED$500
JOHN T JACKSON FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MID AMERICA ASSISTANCE COALITION: $815 → 15%CORNERSTONES OF CARE: $250 → 15%EPEC: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$519k · 27 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
18

Total granted

$519k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+56%

Still filing today

33%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WW
    WAYSIDE WAIFS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $104k · revenue +20%
  • HT
    HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK
    4× · 2022–2025 · $7k · revenue +2%
  • B
    BABY2BABY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $5k · revenue +146%

Funded once

  • PI
    PAWSPERITY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +123%
  • RB
    ROSE BROOKS CENTER INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +21%
  • PF
    POLICE FOUNDATION OF KANSAS CITY
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kansas Wesleyan University

Kansas wesleyan university is a liberal arts college that promotes and integrates academic excellence, spiritual development, personal well-being, and social responsibility.

Education
2
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
3
Kansas Children's Service League Foundation

To protect and promote the well-being of children by providing ongoing support of the charitable mission of the kansas children's service league.

Philanthropy
4
Cultivate Kansas City Inc

Grow food, farms and community in support of a sustainable, healthy and local food system.

Food & Nutrition
5
Kansas City Pet Project

Leading the way in creating a compassionate, safe community for pets and people through progressive lifesaving programs and services, community resources, and educational opportunities.

Animals
6
Chamber of Commerce of Greater Kansas City

Leading the way to the best kc region by convening innovative leaders, collaborating with like-minded organizations, advocating for positive change, and helping small businesses grow.

—
7
Kansas Legal Services Inc

Kansas legal services is devoted to helping low income kansans meet their basic needs through the provision of important legal and mediation services.

—
8
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
9
Washburn University Foundation

The Foundation was created to assist in the promotion, development and enhancement of the financial resources for Washburn University of Topeka, as well as to receive and hold in trust any assets given in benefit of the University.

Education
10
Kansas Farm Bureau

Kansas farm bureau exists to strengthen agriculture and the lives of kansans through advocacy, education, and service.

—
11
Bike Share Kc

Bike share kc provides the greater kansas city area with a bike share system designed for transportation, recreation, and exercise.

Human Services
12
The Ku Endowment Charitable Gift Fund

To strengthen the University and communities that have touched the lives of KU alumni and friends, the mission of The KU Endowment Charitable Gift Fund is to receive and administer gifts and bequests to further the charitable objectives of…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys Club of Greater Kansas City; the most unlike its peers is Worldwide Friends Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
16/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST PAULS EPISCOPAL DAY SCHOOL KANSAS CITY: $107,500 · OtherST PAULS EPISCOPAL DAY SCHOOL KANSAS CITYBOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $73,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBCHILDREN'S MERCY: $41,250 · OtherCHILDREN'S MERCYKU ENDOWMENT: $35,000 · OtherKU ENDOWMENTPAWSPERITY - FKA THE GROOMING PROJECT: $30,000 · OtherPAWSPERITY - FKA THE GROOMING PROJECTVILLAGE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $18,500 · OtherSt Teresa's Academy: $17,515 · Other+29 more: $59,606 · Other+29 moreWAYSIDE WAIFS INC: $104,100 · AnimalsWAYSIDE WAIFS INCUMKC FOUNDATION: $25,350 · EducationPEMBROKE HILL SCHOOL: $10,500 · EducationOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC: $2,000 · Education+2 more: $1,250 · EducationPAWSPERITY INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesMID AMERICA ASSISTANCE COALITION: $815 · Human Services+1 more: $250 · Human ServicesBOYS CLUB OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS GROW CORP: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK: $6,500 · Food & NutritionPOLICE FOUNDATION OF KANSAS CITY: $5,000 · Crime & LegalMETROPOLITAN ORGANIZATION COUNTERING SEXUAL ASSAULT: $500 · Crime & Legal
Other$382,871Animals$104,100Education$39,100Human Services$11,065Youth Development$8,500Food & Nutrition$6,500Crime & Legal$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWAYSIDE WAIFS INC: $104,100 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetUMKC FOUNDATION: $25,350 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPEMBROKE HILL SCHOOL: $10,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPAWSPERITY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK: $6,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBABY2BABY: $5,015 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetROSE BROOKS CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPOLICE FOUNDATION OF KANSAS CITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetABILITY KC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS GROW CORP: $2,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMID AMERICA ASSISTANCE COALITION: $815 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN ORGANIZATION COUNTERING SEXUAL ASSAULT: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTLAND THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGreater Kansas City Community Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Eisenhower Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RABBIT HOLE KC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORNERSTONES OF CARE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WAYSIDE WAIFS INC ↗
  • Who funds UMKC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PEMBROKE HILL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds PAWSPERITY INC ↗
  • Who funds HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds BOYS CLUB OF GREATER KANSAS CITY ↗
  • Who funds BABY2BABY ↗
  • Who funds ROSE BROOKS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds POLICE FOUNDATION OF KANSAS CITY ↗
  • Who funds ABILITY KC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS GROW CORP ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC ↗
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLDWIDE FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MID AMERICA ASSISTANCE COALITION ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN ORGANIZATION COUNTERING SEXUAL ASSAULT ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLAND THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC ↗
  • Who funds Saint Lukes Health System Home Care and Hospice ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO26.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Marion and Henry Bloch Family Foundation · William T Kemper Foundation Commerce Bank Trustee · The Sosland Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · The Sherman Family Foundation · Hallmark Corporate Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · Greater Horizons · The Don & Jean Wagner Charitable Foundation · The Atterbury Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Turner Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Turner Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Turner Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Turner Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Turner Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph