Skip to content
Tulsa Fdn Gen Fd Xxxxx8000 at a glance

· Private foundation

Tulsa Fdn Gen Fd Xxxxx8000

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$996k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$222k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$5.6MEmployment$1.8MYouth Development$198kHealth$130kReligion$120kCrime & Legal$102kFood & Nutrition$96kEducation$71kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $108k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $888k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALVATION ARMY$222,047
TULSA BOYS HOME$222,047
YMCA$222,047
GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF TULSA$222,047
RESONANCE CENTER FOR WOMEN INC$7,500
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES$5,000
REVITALIZE T-TOWN INC$5,000
GLOBAL GARDENS$5,000
CLAREHOUSE INC$5,000
HOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC$5,000
MEALS ON WHEELS OF METRO$5,000
BEHEARD$5,000
PAUSE4PAWS INC$5,000
THE SPRING SHELTER INC$5,000
CAMP FIRE GREEN COUNTRY INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $286k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%HEARTS FOR HEARING FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 16%HEARTS FOR HEARING FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 16%HEARTS FOR HEARING FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 16%HEARTS FOR HEARING FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 16%HEARTS FOR HEARING FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 16%HEARTS FOR HEARING FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 16%EASTERN OKLAHOMA DONATED DENTAL SERVICES: $8k → 15%TULSA DEBATE LEAGUE INCORPORATED: $5k → 15%TULSA DEBATE LEAGUE INCORPORATED: $5k → 15%THE SPRING SHELTER INC: $5k → 15%THE CITY LIGHTS FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA: $5k → 15%THE SPRING SHELTER INC: $5k → 15%THE CITY LIGHTS FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA: $5k → 15%THE SPRING SHELTER INC: $5k → 15%RESONANCE CENTER FOR WOMEN INC: $8k → 15%RESONANCE CENTER FOR WOMEN INC: $5k → 15%RESONANCE CENTER FOR WOMEN INC: $5k → 15%RESONANCE CENTER FOR WOMEN INC: $5k → 15%RESONANCE CENTER FOR WOMEN INC: $5k → 15%MODUS: $5k → 15%MODUS: $3k → 15%CLAREHOUSE INC: $8k → 15%Clarehouse Inc: $7k → 15%CLAREHOUSE INC: $5k → 15%CLAREHOUSE INC: $5k → 15%Clarehouse Inc: $5k → 15%CLAREHOUSE INC: $5k → 15%CLAREHOUSE INC: $5k → 15%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $10k → 15%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $10k → 15%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $10k → 15%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $8k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $8k → 15%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $5k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $5k → 15%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $5k → 15%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $5k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $5k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $5k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $5k → 15%Life Senior Services Inc: $4k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $3k → 15%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $3k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC: $10k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC: $10k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.1M · 38 repeat orgs$210k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

38 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
14

Total granted

$8.1M
$190k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+20%

Still filing today

82%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF TULSA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +75%
  • TULSA BOYS' HOME INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +33%
  • FAMILY SAFETY CENTER INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $57k · revenue +891%

Funded once

  • NO
    NORTHEAST OKLAHOMA DISTRICT CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $32k
  • OV
    Oklahoma Veterans Project Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Hope House Inc

Family Hope House empowers families through therapy, education, and advocacy. As Oklahoma's sole adoption competent mental health agency, we support foster and adoptive children for lasting stability and success.

Health
2
Tulsa Advocates for the Protection of Children

To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.

Crime & Legal
3
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

—
4
La Luz Organization Inc

La Luz Organization helps the underserved Latino population in Oklahoma with culturally and faith based trauma-informed services to victims of domestic violence,sexual assault and stalking.

Human Services
5
Tulsa Casa Inc

Tulsa casa is organized to speak for the best interests of abused and neglected children in court. we promote and support volunteer representation for the children in an effort to provide each child a safe, permanent, nurturing home.

Civil Rights
6
Community Action Project of Tulsa County Inc

Community action project of tulsa county inc.'s (cap tulsa) mission is to help young children in lower-income families grow up and achieve economic success.

Human Services
7
Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers

Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers, Inc. serves the community behavioral health needs of nine counties of Southern Oklahoma. Lighthouse offers integrated care through their outpatient and Health Home programs to adults and children.…

Health
8
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—
9
Livefree Okc Inc

Dramatically reduce gun violence in impacted Oklahoma communities through intervention and effective provision of resources.

Human Services
10
Tulsa Neighborhood Networks Inc

Provide the poor of the city of tulsa, oklahoma an opportunity to improve their quality of life through guidance and training in the areas of education, employment, family skills, healthcare, housing, socialization and spirituality.

Community Improvement
11
Oklahoma City Housing Services Redevelopment Corporation

To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.

Housing & Shelter
12
111 Tulsa Inc

111Tulsa exists to mobilize the local church to see that no child is without a family in Tulsa County.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The City Lights Foundation of Oklahoma; the most unlike its peers is Dillon International Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/46
Grantees still filing
33/46
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SALVATION ARMY: $1,800,755 · OtherSALVATION ARMYYMCA: $1,799,205 · OtherYMCA+32 more: $597,900 · Other+32 moreTULSA BOYS' HOME INC: $1,799,205 · Human ServicesTULSA BOYS' HOME INC+11 more: $286,315 · Human Services+11 moreGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF TULSA INC: $1,799,205 · EmploymentGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF TU…+1 more: $35,000 · EmploymentFAMILY SAFETY CENTER INC: $57,000 · Crime & LegalChild Abuse Network Inc dba Child Advocacy Network: $15,000 · Crime & LegalGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $32,500 · Youth DevelopmentNEW HOPE OKLAHOMA INC: $10,500 · Youth DevelopmentGlobal Gardens Incorporated: $7,500 · Youth DevelopmentREVITALIZE T-TOWN: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterBeHeard Movement Inc: $14,000 · Housing & ShelterTransitional Living Centers of Oklahoma Inc: $2,500 · Housing & ShelterPAUSE4PAWS INC: $15,000 · HealthGRAND LAKE MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $10,000 · HealthHOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 · Health
Other$4,197,860Human Services$2,085,520Employment$1,834,205Crime & Legal$72,000Youth Development$50,500Housing & Shelter$36,500Health$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF TULSA INC: $1,799,205 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetTULSA BOYS' HOME INC: $1,799,205 over 9y, 3.5% of budgetINDIAN NATIONS COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $62,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY SAFETY CENTER INC: $57,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $55,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCAMP FIRE GREEN COUNTRY INC: $52,500 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetHearts for Hearing Foundation: $50,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $42,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetClarehouse Inc: $39,315 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetNEWVIEW OKLAHOMA INC: $35,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $34,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $32,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetYOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetResonance Center for Women Inc: $27,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetA NEW LEAF INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $22,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTULSA BALLET THEATRE INC: $22,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetREVITALIZE T-TOWN: $20,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetPAUSE4PAWS INC: $15,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetThe Pencil Box Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTHE SPRING SHELTER INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBeHeard Movement Inc: $14,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetNEW HOPE OKLAHOMA INC: $10,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSpecial Olympics Oklahoma Inc: $10,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetGRAND LAKE MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CITY LIGHTS FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTULSA DEBATE LEAGUE INCORPORATED: $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE PARENT CHILD CTR OF TULSA INC: $9,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHUNGER FREE OKLAHOMA INC: $8,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEASTERN OKLAHOMA DONATED DENTAL SERVICES INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetModus Inc: $7,500 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetGlobal Gardens Incorporated: $7,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAVANZANDO JUNTOS CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSPROUTS CHILD DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGAINING GROUND CORPORATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEDUCATION FOR SCHOLARS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetOPERATION AWARE OF OKLAHOMA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPhoenix Rising Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetTHE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC: $2,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBroken Arrow Community Playhouse Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF TULSA INC ↗
  • Who funds TULSA BOYS' HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIAN NATIONS COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SAFETY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds CAMP FIRE GREEN COUNTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds Hearts for Hearing Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
  • Who funds Clarehouse Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEWVIEW OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC ↗
  • Who funds Resonance Center for Women Inc ↗
  • Who funds A NEW LEAF INC ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds TULSA BALLET THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds REVITALIZE T-TOWN ↗
  • Who funds Child Abuse Network Inc dba Child Advocacy Network ↗
  • Who funds PAUSE4PAWS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Pencil Box Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE SPRING SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BeHeard Movement Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEW HOPE OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds Special Olympics Oklahoma Inc ↗
  • Who funds GRAND LAKE MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CITY LIGHTS FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA ↗
  • Who funds TULSA DEBATE LEAGUE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds THE PARENT CHILD CTR OF TULSA INC ↗
  • Who funds HUNGER FREE OKLAHOMA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Anne and Henry Za…The Gelvin FoundationTulsa Community Found…George Kaiser Family …Ralph and Frances McG…The Sharna and Irvin …The Hardesty Family F…Grace & Franklin Bern…Mervin Bovaird Founda…Oneok Foundation IncMorningcrest Healthca…One Gas Foundation Inc
The Anne and Henry Zarrow FoundationOK74.5× affinity34 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · George Kaiser Family Foundation · Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of Oklahoma · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · Oneok Foundation Inc · Morningcrest Healthcare Foundation · One Gas Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tulsa Fdn Gen Fd Xxxxx8000 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tulsa Fdn Gen Fd Xxxxx8000. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 170%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Hunger Free Oklahoma Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Newview Oklahoma Inc: 45% of income from government
  • Domestic Violence Intervention Services: 15% of income from government
  • Tulsa Community Foundation: 11% of income from government
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Youth Services of Tulsa Inc: 8% of income from government
  • The Philbrook Museum of Art Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Grand Lake Mental Health Center Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Global Gardens Incorporated: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
17get no government money at all
18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tulsa Fdn Gen Fd Xxxxx8000’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home