· Private foundation
Tsutayo Ichioka & Satsuki Nakao Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 81% of Tsutayo Ichioka & Satsuki Nakao Charitable Foundation’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k15 grants · $65k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $53k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $213k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| USC SCHOOL OF MEDICINE | $113,000 |
| USC SCHOOL OF PHARMACY | $50,000 |
| USC PRICE SCHOOL OF PUBLIC POLICY | $50,000 |
| UNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES | $15,483 |
| HUNTINGTON LIBRARY | $15,000 |
| FIVE ACRES | $12,500 |
| CENTRAL OREGON VETERANS OUTREACH | $10,000 |
| FAMILY FORWARD | $5,700 |
| MAKOTO TAIKO | $5,000 |
| FLINTRIDGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| CHANDLER SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| LOS ANGELES COUNTY MUSEUM OF ART | $5,000 |
| SHEPARD'S HOUSE MINISTRIES | $5,000 |
| NAMBIAR PALLIL EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIA | $5,000 |
| BEND SCIENCE STATION | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
28 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FPFLINTRIDGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL9× · 2017–2025 · $225k · revenue +42%
- FAFive Acres The Boys and Girls' Aid Society of Los Angeles County9× · 2017–2025 · $167k · revenue +25%
- TCTHE CHANDLER SCHOOL9× · 2017–2025 · $97k · revenue +51%
Funded once
- USUSC SCHOOL OF BUSINESSone grant, 2022 · $25k
J BAR J YOUTH SERVICES INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $22k · revenue +48%- JRJERICHO ROAD INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +53%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We are a premier provider dedicated to healing children and young adults, strengthening families, and transforming communities through quality comprehensive services and advocacy. we envision a world in which children and young adults,…
Through a holistic approach to emotional well-being, Wellnest offers hope, healing, and opportunity to the children, young adults, families, and communities we serve. Our commitment remains steadfast as we enter our second century of…
The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…
At the sacramento children's home, we are committed to opening doors to the future by maximizing the potential of children and families.
Our mission is to support children/youth, and their families, in and at-risk of foster care, to build hope and achieve bright futures through wellness, education, relationships, and career focused services and resources.
The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…
Our Vision is to enhance the educational and economic well-being of the people we serve by means of direct human services, advocacy, and referrals.Our Mission is to save lives, unite families, and protect the community through addiction…
The roots of the los angeles didi hirsch psychiatric service dba didi hirsch mental health services ("dhmhs") extend back to the 1930s, when a group of women funded psychiatric care for people whose lives were devastated by the depression.…
Sycamores nonprofit health organization whose mission is cultivating hope and resilience to enrich the well-being of children, families, and communities through out los angeles and riverside counties.
The mission of Wayfinder Family Services is to ensure that children, youth and adults facing challenges always have a place to turn. Founded in 1953 as the Foundation for the Junior Blind, the organization initially enabled visually…
Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Options for Learning and the most unlike its peers is The J Paul Getty Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FLINTRIDGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Five Acres The Boys and Girls' Aid Society of Los Angeles County ↗
- Who funds THE CHANDLER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds HENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY AND ART GALLERY ↗
- Who funds MAKOTO TAIKO ↗
- Who funds BETHLEHEM INN ↗
- Who funds BEND SCIENCE STATION ↗
- Who funds SHEPHERD'S HOUSE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL OREGON VETERAN & COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds J BAR J YOUTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE J PAUL GETTY TRUST ↗
- Who funds UNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES ↗
- Who funds JERICHO ROAD INC ↗
- Who funds PASADENA HUMANE ↗
- Who funds Foothill Family Service ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM ASSOCIATES ↗
- Who funds OPTIONS FOR LEARNING ↗
- Who funds STROKE AWARENESS OREGON ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · United Way of Deschutes County · St Charles Health System Inc · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · Juan Young Trust · The Autzen Foundation · Neighborimpact · Bend Foundation · The Anjulicia Foundation · Whh Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tsutayo Ichioka & Satsuki Nakao Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- J Bar J Youth Services Inc — 58% of income from government
- Cascades Theatrical Company — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.