· Public charity
Neighborimpact
NEIGHBORIMPACT serves the economically disadvantaged of central oregon, including the warm springs indian reservation, with services that include: a regional food bank, head start program (preschool), energy assistance, weatherization, housing, shelter, home-ownership and preservation loans, support to childcare providers and a money…
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $421,016 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $18,407,623 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $17,986,607 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k2 grants · $36k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $386k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE BETHLEHEM INN | $159,433 |
| J BAR J YOUTH SERVICES | $85,834 |
| SAVING GRACE | $79,503 |
| SHEPHERD'S HOUSE MINISTRIES | $60,746 |
| THRIVE CENTRAL OREGON | $20,000 |
| CENTRAL OREGON VETERAN'S OUTREACH | $15,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $515k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
13 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BIBETHLEHEM INN9× · 2017–2025 · $566k · revenue +27%
J BAR J YOUTH SERVICES INC8× · 2017–2024 · $363k · revenue +76%- SHSHEPHERD'S HOUSE MINISTRIES3× · 2021–2024 · $357k · revenue +155%
Funded once
- MVMOUNTAIN VIEW COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $48k · revenue +110%
- ROREACH OUT NPgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $19k · revenue +115%
- TDTHE DOOR AT THREE RIVERS INCone grant, 2022 · $459
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To help families with children in our community who are situationally homeless achieve sustainable independence through a community based response by providing temporary housing, usually 60-90 days, along with case management.
To connect homeowners with a spare bedroom to rent and home seekers in need of affordable housing
Assisting and housing females in recovery
Through shelter and housing, advocacy and supportive services, our mission is to prevent and end homelessness in our community.
Restoration House provides save, supervised housing for men with significant behavioral health needs, creating a stable environment where structure, accountability, and wraparound services support personal growth and long-term recovery.…
Outsiders Inn (OI) provides peer-lead homeless services and operates multiple shelter programs with a recovery focused model in the Clark County, WA area.
Homeless services
Resource for housing and other essential needs
The remnant house, located in lee county, mississippi provides men and women with a faith-based christian transitional living home and recovery program. our christ-centered one year transitional living recovery program allows an individual…
Operation Nightwatch provides nighttime hospitality for Portland's unhoused population. For a few evenings a week, staff and volunteers at thehospitality center provide a safe place, food, socks, blankets, medical care, and welcome our…
Community outreach
To impact community housing
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central Oregon Veteran & Community Outreach Inc and the most unlike its peers is Reach Out Np. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BETHLEHEM INN ↗
- Who funds J BAR J YOUTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds SHEPHERD'S HOUSE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds SAVING GRACE ↗
- Who funds REDEMPTION HOUSE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL OREGON VETERAN & COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds THRIVE CENTRAL OREGON ↗
- Who funds REACH REDMOND ↗
- Who funds DAWNS HOUSE CORPORATION LLC ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN VIEW COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF DESCHUTES COUNTY ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL OREGON VILLAGES ↗
- Who funds REACH OUT NP ↗
- Who funds GRANDMAS HOUSE OF CENTRAL OREGON ↗
- Who funds JEFFERSON COUNTY FAITH BASED NETWORK ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Deschutes County · St Charles Health System Inc · The Oregon Community Foundation · Central Oregon Health Council · The Autzen Foundation · The Anjulicia Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · The Roundhouse Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Cascade Heritage Foundation · Tsutayo Ichioka & Satsuki Nakao Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Neighborimpact funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- J Bar J Youth Services Inc — 71% of income from government
- Central Oregon Veteran & Community Outreach Inc — 51% of income from government
- Saving Grace — 48% of income from government
- Dawns House Corporation Llc — 27% of income from government
- Redemption House Ministries — 14% of income from government
- Thrive Central Oregon — 12% of income from government
- Bethlehem Inn — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.