Skip to content

· Private foundation

Trust Uw David Tod Arrel

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$472k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$1.8MCommunity Improvement$978kHealth$335kYouth Development$213kEducation$119kHousing & Shelter$77kReligion$64kArts & Culture$45kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $147k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $310k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$9.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION MAHONING VALLEY$200,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF YOUNGSTOWN$60,000
INSPIRING MINDS YOUNGSTOWN$50,000
URSULINE SISTERS MISSION$40,000
RESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY$30,000
MAHONING VALLEY COLLEGE ACCESS PROGRAM$25,000
BEATITUDE HOUSE$25,000
MAHONING VALLEY SOJOURN TO THE PAST$15,000
GREATER WARREN-YOUNGSTOWN URBAN LEAGUE I$12,000
OPERATION WARM INC$7,000
HUMILITY OF MARY HOUSING$6,083
STEM IS US 20$1,783
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%OPERATION WARM: $8k → 10%OPERATION WARM INC: $7k → 10%INSPIRING MINDS YOUNGSTOWN: $50k → 16%COMPASS FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES: $283k → 19%COMPASS FAMILY & COMMUNITY SVS: $213k → 19%COMPASS FAMILY & COMMUNITY SVS: $213k → 19%GREATER WARREN-YOUNGSTOWN URBAN LEAGUE I: $12k → 16%COMPASS FAMILY & COMMUNITY SVS: $210k → 19%COMPASS FAMILY & COMMUNITY SVS: $197k → 19%COMPASS FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES: $160k → 19%COMPASS FAMILY & COMMUNITY SVS: $151k → 19%COMPASS FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES: $150k → 19%INSPIRING MINDS OF YOUNGSTOWN: $30k → 19%INSPIRING MINDS OF YOUNGSTOWN: $10k → 19%INSPIRING MINDS OF YOUNGSTOWN: $5k → 19%YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $8k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.1M · 13 repeat orgs$743k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
23

Total granted

$3.1M
$424k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
0%

Still filing today

85%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $319k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementEducationHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    COMPASS FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +9%
  • AN
    ASSOCIATED NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS
    6× · 2017–2022 · $953k · revenue +110%
  • AC
    ALTA CARE GROUP INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $102k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • MA
    Mayerson Academy for Human Resources
    one grant, 2022 · $60k · revenue -56%
  • IF
    INC FAMILY & COMMUNITY
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
  • SM
    STUDENTS MOTIVATED BY THE ARTS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue +7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The United Way of Youngstown and the Mahoning Valley

The united way of youngstown and the mahoning valley seeks to be the driving force behind sustained improvement in the lives of all our citizens, through initiatives that promote education, income, health, and community support services.

Philanthropy
2
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Greater Cleveland

Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

Youth Development
3
United Way of North Central Ohio Inc

At united way of north central ohio, we bring people, organizations, and resources together to create solutions that improve the lives of every person in every community in our region.

—
4
Youth Advocate Services

Yas strives to provide culturally competent mental health treatment, independent living skill development and care planning services in order to prevent out of home placement.

Human Services
5
Leadership Mahoning Valley Inc

Leadership mahoning valley, inc. is a not-for-profit corporation located in youngstown, ohio. the corporation was formed in 1994 to identify individuals with diverse backgrounds and experiences who demonstrate leadership talent and…

Public Benefit
6
United Methodist Community Center

UMCC is a not for profit organization affiliated with Global Ministries, consisting of persons of all faiths and providing diversified social services to the community. Its major emphasis is the need of young people their families in the…

—
7
Youngstown Urban Minority Alcoholism and Drug Abuse Outreach Program Inc

The mission of youngstown umadaop, inc., is to prevent and reduce the misuse of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs, and other behavioral health issues across the lifespan by delivering innovative, culturally appropriate, evidence-based…

Health
8
Child & Adolescent Behavioral Health

We are the premier childrens mental health agency that reduces the suffering experienced by children who have emotional problems related to depression, anxiety, and behavior like adhd. untreated, these problems can lead to failure in…

—
9
South Central Ohio Big Brothers Big Sisters Association

Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

Youth Development
10
Catholic Charities Serving Portage and Stark Counties

Catholic charities serving portage and stark counties shares the mission held by catholic charities usa: to provide service to people in need, advocate for justice in social structures, and call the entire church and other people of good…

—
11
Mid-Ohio Youth Mentoring

To insure that all children living in the organization's service area will have the opportunity to experience positive mentoring relationships.

Youth Development
12
Youth Service Bureau of Porter County Inc

To support children and families.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Beatitude House Inc; the most unlike its peers is Operation Warm Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/33
Grantees still filing
16/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMPASS FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1,576,804 · Human ServicesCOMPASS FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICESInspiring Minds of Youngstown Inc: $95,000 · Human ServicesInspiring Minds of Youngstown Inc+3 more: $34,967 · Human ServicesASSOCIATED NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS: $953,271 · Community ImprovementASSOCIATED NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER…CATHOLIC CHARITIES REGIONAL AGENCY: $53,790 · Community Improvement+1 more: $25,000 · Community ImprovementMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION MAHONING VALLEY: $200,000 · OtherMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF YOUNGSTOWN: $75,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF YO…Mayerson Academy for Human Resources: $59,800 · OtherMayerson Academy for Hu…Individual grant recipient: $51,783 · OtherIndividual grant recipi…URSULINE SISTERS MISSION: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherINC FAMILY & COMMUNITY: $30,000 · OtherPASTORAL COUNSELING SERVICE OF SUMMIT CO: $30,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF THE: $30,000 · OtherSTUDENTS MOTIVATED BY THE ARTS INC: $30,000 · Other+15 more: $202,456 · Other+15 moreALTA CARE GROUP INC: $101,783 · HealthSIGHT FOR ALL UNITED INC: $3,690 · HealthHEART REACH NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRIES: $62,962 · ReligionCOMMISSION FOR JEWISH EDUCATION OF GREATER YOUNGSTOWN: $23,790 · ReligionBRIGHTSIDE PROJECT INC: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentPROJECT MKC: $18,664 · Youth DevelopmentKOOL BOIZ FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentOHIO URBAN RENAISSANCE: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentRESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY: $59,400 · Housing & ShelterDOROTHY DAY HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY: $5,000 · Housing & Shelter
Human Services$1,706,771Community Improvement$1,032,061Other$784,039Health$105,473Religion$86,752Youth Development$73,664Housing & Shelter$64,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMPASS FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1,576,804 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetALTA CARE GROUP INC: $101,783 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetInspiring Minds of Youngstown Inc: $95,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF YOUNGSTOWN: $75,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetHEART REACH NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRIES: $62,962 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetMayerson Academy for Human Resources: $59,800 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetRESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY: $59,400 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES REGIONAL AGENCY: $53,790 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetURSULINE SISTERS MISSION: $40,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSTUDENTS MOTIVATED BY THE ARTS INC: $30,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetPASTORAL COUNSELING SERVICE OF SUMMIT CO: $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBEATITUDE HOUSE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE YOUNGSTOWN EDISON BUSINESS INCUBATOR: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE VILLAGE NETWORK: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKENT STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRIGHTSIDE PROJECT INC: $25,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetCOMMISSION FOR JEWISH EDUCATION OF GREATER YOUNGSTOWN: $23,790 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetUNITED WAY OF TRUMBULL COUNTY: $20,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetPROJECT MKC: $18,664 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetKOOL BOIZ FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetOHIO URBAN RENAISSANCE: $15,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetMAHONING VALLEY SOJOURN TO THE PAST: $15,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetOperation Warm Inc: $14,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HUNGER ALLIANCE: $12,750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUMILITY OF MARY HOUSING INC: $12,166 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYWCA MAHONING VALLEY: $8,467 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetALL CHILDREN LEARN DIFFERENTLY SCHOOL AND LEARNING CENTER: $7,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetDOROTHY DAY HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSIGHT FOR ALL UNITED INC: $3,690 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Mahoning ValleyOH49.1× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Mahoning Valley · Walter E & Caroline H Watson Trust · The William Swanston Charitable Fund · Ruth Beecher H XI Char Tw · The United Way of Youngstown and the Mahoning Valley · Youngstown Fdn General · Senator Maurice & Florence Lipscher Char · The Raymond John Wean Foundation · Premier Bank Foundation · The Wm M & a Cafaro Family Foundation · Youngstown Area Jewish Foundation · James & Coralie Centofanti Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Trust Uw David Tod Arrel funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Trust Uw David Tod Arrel. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Trust Uw David Tod Arrel’s filings →

    More from the funding graph