Skip to content

· Private foundation

Truettner Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$410k
Granted FY2025still arriving
128
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$608kHealth$394kEducation$393kAnimals$353kRecreation & Sports$340kArts & Culture$321kPhilanthropy$103kPublic Safety & Disaster$85kOther$0
02FY2025 · 128 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k120 grants · $230k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$1,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
APPALACHIAN VOICES$50,000
AMERICAN RIVERS$50,000
MANCHESTER HISTORICAL SOCIETY$25,000
COLORADO COLLEGE$13,659
VERMONT LAND TRUST$11,000
SIERRA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION$10,000
BURR AND BURTON ACADEMY$10,000
STRATTON MOUNTAIN & VALLEY COMMUNITY$10,000
AMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST$9,000
CRESTED BUTTE SEARCH AND RESCUE$8,000
FOR GOODNESS CAKES$8,000
WOMEN'S DISMAS HOUSE$7,500
WESTON PLAYHOUSE THEATRE COMPANY$7,500
CRESTED BUTTE NORDIC CENTER$7,500
TOWN OF MANITOWISH WATERS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $120k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FOR GOODNESS CAKES: $8k → 14%FOR GOODNESS CAKES: $3k → 14%FOR GOODNESS CAKES: $2k → 14%HOME OF HOPE INC: $3k → 10%FOR GOODNESS CAKES: $2k → 14%GUNNISON COUNTRY FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 10%FOR GOODNESS CAKES: $1k → 14%FOR GOODNESS CAKES: $650 → 14%GUNNISON COUNTRY FOOD PANTRY: $4k → 10%FOR GOODNESS CAKES: $500 → 14%FOR GOODNESS CAKES: $500 → 14%JOURNEY CARE: $1k → 14%GUNNISON COUNTRY FOOD PANTRY: $3k → 10%GUNNISON COUNTRY FOOD PANTRY: $2k → 10%GUNNISON COUNTRY FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 10%ALL BRAINS BELONG VT: $3k → 9%TAHOE YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $4k → 8%TAHOE YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $4k → 8%GUNNISON COUNTRY FOOD PANTRY: $500 → 10%TAHOE YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 8%JOURNEY CARE: $1k → 14%COURAGE WORLDWIDE: $3k → 10%TAHOE YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 8%TAHOE YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 8%TAHOE YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $500 → 8%TAHOE YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $500 → 8%CHILDCARE RESOURCES OF INDIAN RIVER: $250 → 12%PAWSITIVE SOLUTIONS INC: $50k → 12%PAWSITIVE SOLUTIONS INC: $12k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IN
OH
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
WV
VA
MD
KS
TN
NC
DC
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 186 repeat orgs$200k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

186 repeat relationships: 107 still active in FY2025, 79 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

186
57

Total granted

$2.8M
$165k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+7%

Still filing today

71%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureAnimalsEducationHealthEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF HILDENE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $114k · revenue +35%
  • RA
    RED ARROW CAMP FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $92k · revenue +151%
  • DM
    Design Museum of Chicago
    5× · 2019–2023 · $90k · revenue +180%

Funded once

  • CS
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY-MONTEREY BAY
    one grant, 2017 · $34k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -8%
  • CH
    CHICAGO HISTORY MUSEUM
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sierra Watch

Sierra watch secures conservation outcomes to protect the natural resources, mountain communities, and timeless values of the tahoe sierra.

Environment
2
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
3
Estes Valley Land Trust

The mission of estes valley land trust is to conserve land throughout the estes valley and surrounding areas for current and future generations.

Environment
4
The Montana Land Reliance

The mission of the montana land reliance (mlr) is to partner with landowners to provide permanent protection for private lands that are significant for agricultural production, fish and wildlife habitat, and open space.

Environment
5
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
6
The Sierra Fund

The Sierra Fund (TSF) is a non-profit organization with a mission to restore ecosystem and community resiliency in the Sierra Nevada.

Environment
7
Aspen Valley Land Trust

Protecting the open land and special places of the roaring fork and middle colorado river valleys for wildlife, agriculture, and community forever.

Environment
8
Wildearth Guardians

Wildearth guardians works to protect and restore the wildlife, wild places, wild rivers, and health of the american west.

Unclassified
9
Conservation Legacy

Conservation legacy engages future leaders who protect, restore, and enhance our nation's lands through community-based service.in 2024, conservation legacy engaged 2,524 participants who completed over 1.5 million service hours on public…

Youth Development
10
The Land Trust for Tennessee Inc

To conserve the unique character of tennessee's natural and historic landscapes and sites for future generations.

Environment
11
Glacier National Park Conservancy

The glacier national park conservancy works to preserve and protect glacier national park for future generations.

Recreation & Sports
12
Minnesota Land Trust

The minnesota land trust protects and restores minnesota's most vital natural lands in order to provide wildlife habitat, clean water, outdoor experiences and scenic beauty for generations to come.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Thunderbird Lodge Preservation Society; the most unlike its peers is Marcella Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

175 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 175 of the 261 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
47
Early backer (in before they grew)
169/175
Grantees still filing
123/175
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CRESTED BUTTE NORDIC CENTER: $172,580 · OtherCRESTED BUTTE NORDIC CENTERRED ARROW CAMP FOUNDATION INC: $92,250 · OtherRED ARROW CAMP FOUNDATION INCJESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $73,500 · OtherJESUIT HIGH SCHOOLPLACER COUNTY SHERIFF COUNCIL: $54,000 · OtherTAHOE WOMEN'S COMMUNITY FUND: $51,000 · Other+100 more: $908,098 · Other+100 moreVERMONT LAND TRUST INC: $66,000 · EnvironmentVERMONT LAND T…AMERICAN RIVERS INC: $56,000 · EnvironmentAMERICAN RIVER…LIVING LANDS & WATERS: $56,000 · EnvironmentLIVING LANDS &…APPALACHIAN VOICES: $53,000 · EnvironmentAPPALACHIAN VO…TAHOE FUND: $44,780 · EnvironmentTAHOE FUNDTHE WETLANDS INITIATIVE: $38,000 · EnvironmentTHE WETLANDS I…INDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST INC: $15,000 · EnvironmentMCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $14,500 · Environment+4 more: $25,181 · Environment+4 moreFRIENDS OF HILDENE INC: $113,500 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF HI…Design Museum of Chicago: $90,000 · Arts & CultureDesign Museum…RIVERSIDE THEATRE INC: $24,316 · Arts & CultureRIVERSIDE THE…NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES: $15,000 · Arts & CultureTHE WESTON PLAYHOUSE THEATER: $13,000 · Arts & Culture+18 more: $98,950 · Arts & Culture+18 moreCASA DE AMMA: $46,500 · HealthCASA DE AM…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $39,500 · HealthBLOOD CANC…SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $30,000 · HealthSUTTER ROS…GUNNISON VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $26,000 · HealthGUNNISON V…Battenkill Valley Health Center Inc: $22,500 · HealthBattenkill…MAYO CLINIC: $21,000 · HealthMAYO CLINI…Barton Memorial Hospital Foundation: $18,089 · HealthBarton Mem…INDIAN RIVER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · HealthPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $14,000 · HealthLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $13,500 · HealthLIVING JOURNEYS: $10,500 · Health+6 more: $26,750 · Health+6 moreSHENANDOAH UNIVERSITY: $60,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION: $24,000 · EducationTHE COLORADO COLLEGE: $23,659 · EducationBURR & BURTON SEMINARY: $21,000 · EducationWilliams College: $18,500 · EducationLAKE TAHOE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $12,500 · EducationTAHOE MAGIC INC: $10,000 · Education+6 more: $36,100 · EducationSociety for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County: $39,500 · AnimalsTHE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC: $37,000 · AnimalsMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $31,000 · AnimalsTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $23,000 · AnimalsPEACE OF MIND DOG RESCUE: $16,250 · AnimalsWOLF HAVEN INTERNATIONAL: $10,000 · AnimalsORCA CONSERVANCY: $10,000 · AnimalsOUR HOUSE OF HOPE INC: $8,500 · AnimalsRUTLAND COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $7,750 · Animals+10 more: $45,250 · AnimalsPAWSITIVE SOLUTIONS INC: $62,000 · Human ServicesTAHOE COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $22,500 · Human ServicesTahoe Youth and Family Services: $18,250 · Human ServicesFOR GOODNESS CAKES: $16,650 · Human ServicesGUNNISON COUNTRY FOOD PANTRY INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $8,000 · Human Services+4 more: $9,500 · Human Services
Other$1,351,428Environment$368,461Arts & Culture$354,766Health$283,339Education$230,759Animals$228,250Human Services$151,900

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF HILDENE INC: $113,500 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetRED ARROW CAMP FOUNDATION INC: $92,250 over 9y, 9.1% of budgetDesign Museum of Chicago: $90,000 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetVERMONT LAND TRUST INC: $66,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPAWSITIVE SOLUTIONS INC: $62,000 over 2y, 87% of budgetSHENANDOAH UNIVERSITY: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN RIVERS INC: $56,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetLIVING LANDS & WATERS: $56,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetAPPALACHIAN VOICES: $53,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCASA DE AMMA: $46,500 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetTAHOE FUND: $44,780 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSociety for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County: $39,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $39,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WETLANDS INITIATIVE: $38,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTHE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC: $37,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $31,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBOULDER JUNCTION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $27,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetThe Boat Company Ltd: $26,250 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGUNNISON VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $26,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetMANCHESTER HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $25,750 over 4y, 18% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERSIDE THEATRE INC: $24,316 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION: $24,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLORADO COLLEGE: $23,659 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $23,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBattenkill Valley Health Center Inc: $22,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTAHOE COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $22,500 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetLEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE: $21,750 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $21,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBURR & BURTON SEMINARY: $21,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetH3O FOUNDATION: $19,250 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetYoung America's Foundation: $19,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD CUPBOARD INC: $18,500 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetWilliams College: $18,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTahoe Youth and Family Services: $18,250 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetBarton Memorial Hospital Foundation: $18,089 over 5y, 11% of budgetFOR GOODNESS CAKES: $16,650 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetPEACE OF MIND DOG RESCUE: $16,250 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSierra State Parks Foundation: $15,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetEL DORADO COUNTY SEARCH & RESCUE COUNCIL INC: $15,250 over 9y, 5.7% of budgetNATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGUNNISON COUNTRY FOOD PANTRY INC: $15,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetINDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST INC: $15,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCRESTED BUTTE SEARCH AND RESCUE INC: $14,500 over 5y, 11% of budgetMCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $14,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST: $14,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $14,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF HILDENE INC ↗
  • Who funds RED ARROW CAMP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Design Museum of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds VERMONT LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds PAWSITIVE SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds SHENANDOAH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN RIVERS INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVING LANDS & WATERS ↗
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN VOICES ↗
  • Who funds CASA DE AMMA ↗
  • Who funds TAHOE FUND ↗
  • Who funds Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WETLANDS INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds THE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOULDER JUNCTION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Boat Company Ltd ↗
  • Who funds GUNNISON VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MANCHESTER HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RIVERSIDE THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE COLORADO COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Battenkill Valley Health Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds TAHOE COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS ↗
  • Who funds LEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds BURR & BURTON SEMINARY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

The Vermont Community FoundationVT34.4× affinity20 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Vermont Community Foundation · Tahoe Community Foundation · El Dorado Community Foundation · Alcyon Foundation · The Orvis Charitable Foundation · Indian River Community Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of the Gunnison Valley · Pipkin Charitable Foundation · The Windham Foundation Inc · Vermont Council on the Arts Inc · The Fowler Family Charitable Foundation Inc · Dea Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Truettner Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Truettner Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 220%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Elizabeth Freeman Center Inc: 76% of income from government
  • Smokey House Center: 54% of income from government
  • Vermont Land Trust Inc: 42% of income from government
  • Battenkill Valley Health Center Inc: 33% of income from government
  • Preservation Trust of Vermont Inc: 29% of income from government
  • Retreat Farm Ltd: 25% of income from government
  • The Green Mountain Club Inc Debonis: 17% of income from government
  • Governor's Institutes of Vermont: 15% of income from government
  • Vermont Foodbank: 13% of income from government
  • All Brains Belong Vt Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Vna & Hospice of the Southwest Region Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Burr & Burton Seminary: 2% of income from government
  • Lewis & Clark College: 2% of income from government
  • Southwestern Vermont Medical Center: 1% of income from government
  • The Weston Playhouse Theater: 0% of income from government
  • Indian River Land Trust Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Vermont Journalism Trust Ltd: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Williams College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
22get no government money at all
29report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 261 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Truettner Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph