Skip to content

· Private foundation

Trillium Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$83k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$122kHuman Services$87kCrime & Legal$65kHousing & Shelter$47kCommunity Improvement$42kEnvironment$42kEducation$40kHealth$36kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $63k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$429k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
URBAN GATEWAYS$10,000
COMMUNITY PARTNERS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING$10,000
FAMILY FOCUS INC$9,000
FENIX HEALTH CENTER INC$8,000
ZACHARIAS SEXUAL ABUSE CENTER$8,000
ROTARY CLUB OF HIGHLAND PARKHIGHWOOD$8,000
HIGHLAND PARK COMMUNITY NURSERY SCHOOL$7,500
RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOC$5,000
CHICAGO BOTANIC GARDEN$5,000
NORTH SUBURBAN LEGAL AID CLINIC$5,000
JEWISH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES$2,500
ASPIRITECH NFP$2,500
HIGHLAND PARK SENIOR CENTER$1,000
HIGHLAND PARK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $78k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FAMILY FOCUS INC: $16k → 14%FAMILY FOCUS INC: $9k → 14%FAMILY FOCUS INC: $9k → 14%FAMILY FOCUS INC: $9k → 14%FAMILY FOCUS INC: $9k → 14%JEWISH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $4k → 14%JEWISH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 14%JEWISH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 14%JEWISH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 14%JEWISH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 14%ASPIRITECH NFP: $5k → 8%ASPIRITECH NFP: $3k → 8%ASPIRITECH NFP: $3k → 8%ASPIRITECH NFP: $3k → 8%ASPIRITECH NFP: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$469k · 13 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against -30% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
3

Total granted

$469k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
-30%

Still filing today

77%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureCrime & LegalEnvironmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $59k · revenue +52%
  • Family Focus
    5× · 2021–2025 · $51k · revenue +154%
  • ZS
    ZACHARIAS SEXUAL ABUSE CENTER
    5× · 2021–2025 · $42k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • FS
    FAMILY SERVICE OF LAKE COUNTY
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -30%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • LO
    LYRIC OPERA
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Legal Aid Chicago

At legal aid chicago, we work together to provide high quality civil legal aid to people living in poverty and other vulnerable groups.through advocacy, education, collaboration, and litigation we empower individuals, protect fundamental…

Crime & Legal
2
Highland Park Conservancy Inc

The mission is to preserve Highland Park's unique heritage and to promote its vast horticultural, educational and recreational resources. Continued on Schedule OWe support planning, management and restoration, and engage the community…

Environment
3
Lakeside Community Committee

To enhance the quality of life for children and families by inspiring hope and empowerment and growth within all whom we serve.

Human Services
4
Chicago Free School

Chicago Free School provides pre-kindergarten through 8th grade instruction and support activities. The faculty consists of qualified indiviuals with the appropriate education and experiende to provide students with the education that…

Education
5
The Chicago High School for the Arts

The chicago high school for the arts (chiarts) develops the next generation of diverse, artistically promising scholar-artists through intensive pre-professional training in the arts, combined with a comprehensive college preparatory…

Education
6
Chicago Family Health Center Inc

Chicago family health center will promote health, work to prevent disease and provide treatment through the delivery of quality, accessible primary healtcare that is culturally sensitive, affordable, and responsive to community and…

—
7
The University of Chicago Charter School Corporation

To Prepare Students for Success in Four-Year Colleges.

Education
8
Jewish Family Service

Jewish Family Service is a nonprofit social service organization that supports people of all faiths as they navigate through lifes's challenges - illness, aging , finanical uncertainty, mental health concerns, family problems, or personal…

—
9
Highland Park Chamber of Commerce Inc

Local chamber of commerce

—
10
Center for Family Services

Administering an array of critical, intensive therapeutic interventions and/or facilitation services to emotionally and behaviorally disturbed clients for whom DCFS is legally responsible in order to stabilize their traditional or home of…

Human Services
11
Lakeshore Legal Aid

Standing with our neighbors, Lakeshore Legal Aid fights poverty and injustice through advocacy and by providing meaningful and dignified access to the legal system.

Crime & Legal
12
Northbrook Community Nursery School

Northbrook community nursery school, through the cooperation of staff, board and parents, is committed to meeting the social, emotional, intellectual and physical needs of each child. the preschool strives to facilitate this development…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Focus; the most unlike its peers is Rotary Club of Highland Park- Highwood. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY PARTNERS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING: $47,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY PARTNERS FOR AFFORDABLE H…ROTARY CLUB OF HIGHLAND PARK- HIGHWOOD: $42,000 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF HIGHLAND PARK- HIGHW…FENIX HEALTH CENTER INC: $36,000 · OtherFENIX HEALTH CENTER INCFAMILY SERVICE OF LAKE COUNTY: $20,000 · OtherFAMILY SERVICE OF LAKE COUNTY+3 more: $13,000 · Other+3 moreRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $59,000 · Arts & CultureRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATI…URBAN GATEWAYS: $57,500 · Arts & CultureURBAN GATEWAYSFamily Focus: $50,500 · Human ServicesFamily FocusASPIRITECH NFP: $14,500 · Human ServicesASPIRITECH NFPJewish Child and Family Services: $13,000 · Human ServicesJewish Child and …ZACHARIAS SEXUAL ABUSE CENTER: $42,000 · Crime & LegalZACHARIAS SEXU…NORTH SUBURBAN LEGAL AID CLINIC: $22,500 · Crime & LegalNORTH SUBURBAN…CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $41,500 · EnvironmentCHICAGO H…HIGHLAND PARK COMMUNITY NURSERY SCHOOL: $40,000 · EducationHighland Park Community Foundation: $6,000 · Philanthropy
Other$158,000Arts & Culture$116,500Human Services$78,000Crime & Legal$64,500Environment$41,500Education$40,000Philanthropy$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $59,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN GATEWAYS: $57,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetFamily Focus: $50,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetZACHARIAS SEXUAL ABUSE CENTER: $42,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF HIGHLAND PARK- HIGHWOOD: $42,000 over 5y, 8.9% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $41,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHIGHLAND PARK COMMUNITY NURSERY SCHOOL: $40,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetNORTH SUBURBAN LEGAL AID CLINIC: $22,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE OF LAKE COUNTY: $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetASPIRITECH NFP: $14,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJewish Child and Family Services: $13,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHighland Park Community Foundation: $6,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds URBAN GATEWAYS ↗
  • Who funds Family Focus ↗
  • Who funds ZACHARIAS SEXUAL ABUSE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF HIGHLAND PARK- HIGHWOOD ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds HIGHLAND PARK COMMUNITY NURSERY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds NORTH SUBURBAN LEGAL AID CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE OF LAKE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds ASPIRITECH NFP ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Child and Family Services ↗
  • Who funds Highland Park Community Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL18× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · Highland Park Community Foundation · Healthcare Foundation of Highland Park · The Lake County Community Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Mills Family Charitable Foundation · First Bank Chicago Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Trillium Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Trillium Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Trillium Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Trillium Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Trillium’s filings →

    More from the funding graph