Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Trillium Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$496k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Environment$625kArts & Culture$331kCommunity Improvement$165kEducation$124kHuman Services$110kCivil Rights$80kYouth Development$78kFood & Nutrition$72kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $425k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$9.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LANDER CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK$50,000
COMUNIDADES ORGANIZANDO EL PODER Y LA ACCIN LATINA$40,000
WYOMING OUTDOOR COUNCIL$40,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY WYOMING$35,000
THE CENTER FOR POPULAR RESEARCH EDUCATION AND POLICY DBA WIND RIVER FOOD SO$30,000
WYOFILE$30,000
FRIENDS OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER$30,000
AMHERST H WILDER FOUNDATION$30,000
WIND RIVER DEVELOPMENT FUND$25,000
JUGAAD LEADERSHIP PROGRAM$25,000
NEXUS COMMUNITY PARTNERS$25,000
MN350$20,000
SAHAN JOURNAL$15,000
DEER LAKE CONSERVANCY$10,000
MACALESTER COLLEGE$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AMHERST H WILDER FOUNDATION: $30k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Trillium Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Trillium Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$966k · 21 repeat orgs$594k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
23

Total granted

$966k
$438k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+51%

Still filing today

76%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $156k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’22’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentEducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WO
    WYOMING OUTDOOR COUNCIL
    4× · 2019–2025 · $120k · revenue +67%
  • AH
    AMHERST H WILDER FOUNDATION
    4× · 2019–2025 · $110k · revenue +28%
  • W
    WYOFILE
    3× · 2022–2025 · $91k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • ND
    NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $70k · revenue +169%
  • TC
    The Center for Popular Research, Education and
    one grant, 2022 · $45k
  • CO
    Comunidades Organizando el Poder y la Acción Latina
    one grant, 2024 · $40k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Land Trust

The minnesota land trust protects and restores minnesota's most vital natural lands in order to provide wildlife habitat, clean water, outdoor experiences and scenic beauty for generations to come.

Environment
2
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

3
Conservation Minnesota

Conservation minnesota's mission is to turn our shared conservation values into state priorities and provide you with the information you need to make decisions for your family, community and future.

Environment
4
Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce

Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.

5
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

6
Arts Midwest Incorporated

Arts Midwest works collaboratively with private and public arts supporters to support, inform, and celebrate arts organizations and creative communities across the Midwest. Our mission is to build unprecedented opportunity across the…

Arts & Culture
7
African Development Center

Grow businesses, build wealth and increase reinvestement in the african communities of minnesota

Human Services
8
Mn Community Measurement

Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.

Health
9
Minnesota Council of Nonprofits Inc

The Minnesota Council of Nonprofits informs, promotes, connects and strengthens individual nonprofits and the nonprofit sector.

Philanthropy
10
Northwest Minnesota Arts Council

Support and enhance the development of the arts in northwestern minnesota. facilitate and encourage the creation and appreciation of the arts.

Arts & Culture
11
Lake Street Council

Lake Street Council engages, serves, and advocates for the Lake Street business community in Minneapolis to ensure the vitality and prosperity of the commercial corridor. The Lake Street Council fosters economic vitality and amplifies Lake…

Community Improvement
12
Minneapolis Downtown Council

To create an extraordinary downtown minneapolis, applying the core values of leadership, collaboration, advocacy and innovation.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Springboard for the Arts and the most unlike its peers is Lander Childrens Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Youth Empowerment & EquityYouth Sports LeaguesClassical & Jazz Music Orga…Neighborhood Development Or…Community Arts Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%6%<5yr13%11%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr20%33%20–35yr16%19%35–55yr15%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%9%<5yr13%5%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr20%30%20–35yr16%13%35–55yr15%29%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/37
the rest of the field
11%
536/4,842

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
22/35
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LANDER CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK — $122,500 · OtherLANDER CLIMATE ACTION NETWORKTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $105,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYJUGAAD LEADERSHIP PROGRAM — $45,000 · OtherJUGAAD LEADERSHIP PROGRAMThe Center for Popular Research, Education and — $45,000 · OtherThe Center for Popular Research, Education andComunidades Organizando el Poder y la Acción Latina — $40,000 · OtherCOMUNIDADES ORGANIZANDO EL PODER Y LA ACCIN LATINA — $40,000 · OtherComunidades Organizando el Poder y la Acción — $40,000 · OtherTHE FRIENDS OF THE SAINT PAUL PUBLIC LIBRARY — $40,000 · OtherSCHROEDER AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $35,000 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR POPULAR RESEARCH EDUCATION AND POLICY DBA WIND RIVER FOOD SO — $30,000 · OtherThe Center for Popular Research, Education and Policy DBA Wind River Food Sovereignty — $30,000 · Other+17 more — $197,950 · Other+17 moreWYOMING OUTDOOR COUNCIL — $120,000 · EnvironmentWYOMING OUTDOOR COUNCI…FRIENDS OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER — $90,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE MISSISS…MN350 — $70,000 · EnvironmentMN350NATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL — $30,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADE…SUGARLOAF THE NORTH SHORE STEWARDSHIP ASSOCIATION — $20,000 · EnvironmentSUGARLOAF THE NORTH SH…+2 more — $15,000 · EnvironmentWYOFILE — $91,200 · Arts & CultureWYOFILELANDER ART CENTER — $42,000 · Arts & CultureLANDER ART CENT…SCHUBERT CLUB THE — $30,000 · Arts & CultureSCHUBERT CLUB T…RAMSEY COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $28,000 · Arts & CultureRAMSEY COUNTY H…SPRINGBOARD FOR THE ARTS — $20,000 · Arts & CultureSPRINGBOARD FOR…PUBLIC ART SAINT PAUL — $10,000 · Arts & CultureTen Thousand Things Theater — $10,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $5,000 · Arts & CultureAMHERST H WILDER FOUNDATION — $110,000 · Human ServicesAMHERST H W…NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC — $70,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOO…LANDER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $50,000 · EducationMACALESTER COLLEGE — $30,000 · EducationAUGSBURG UNIVERSITY — $15,000 · EducationSahan Journal — $15,000 · EducationMONTESSORI TRAINING CENTER OF MINNESOTA INC — $15,000 · Education+1 more — $4,000 · EducationURBAN BOATBUILDERS INC — $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentWIND RIVER DEVELOPMENT FUND — $25,000 · Community Improvement
Other$770,450Environment$345,000Arts & Culture$236,200Human Services$180,000Education$129,000Youth Development$30,000Community Improvement$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWYOMING OUTDOOR COUNCIL — $120,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetAMHERST H WILDER FOUNDATION — $110,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $105,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWYOFILE — $91,200 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER — $90,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC — $70,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMN350 — $70,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetLANDER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetJUGAAD LEADERSHIP PROGRAM — $45,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetLANDER ART CENTER — $42,000 over 4y, 9.9% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF THE SAINT PAUL PUBLIC LIBRARY — $40,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSCHROEDER AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $35,000 over 4y, 20% of budgetURBAN BOATBUILDERS INC — $30,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetNATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL — $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSCHUBERT CLUB THE — $30,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetMACALESTER COLLEGE — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRAMSEY COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $28,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetSUGARLOAF THE NORTH SHORE STEWARDSHIP ASSOCIATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSPRINGBOARD FOR THE ARTS — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAUGSBURG UNIVERSITY — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONTESSORI TRAINING CENTER OF MINNESOTA INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPUBLIC ART SAINT PAUL — $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTen Thousand Things Theater — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetLANDER CHILDRENS MUSEUM — $7,500 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetREVIVING THE ISLAMIC SISTERHOOD FOR — $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE BOUNDARY WATERS WILDERNESS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMinnesota Council on Foundations — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT SUCCESS — $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAN OPERA THEATRE — $3,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetGRAND CANYON MUSIC FESTIVAL INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saint Paul & Minnesota FoundationMN31.6× affinity15 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Fr Bigelow Foundation · The McKnight Foundation · Elmer L & Eleanor J Andersen Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Hardenbergh Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Pohlad Family Foundation · Mortenson Family Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Fairview Foundation · Lander Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Trillium Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Trillium Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Trillium Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph