· Private foundation
Trevelyan Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k12 grants · $21k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $55k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE AMALGAMATED FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| GRACE | $20,000 |
| PFLAG | $10,000 |
| ROCK CREEK PARK CONSERVANCY | $5,163 |
| GAY MEN'S CHORUS OF WASHINGTON | $3,500 |
| THE DC ABORTION FUND | $3,105 |
| PAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND | $1,766 |
| COLLEGE TRACKS | $1,030 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,030 |
| COLLEGIATE DIRECTIONS INC | $1,030 |
| HORIZONS GREATER WASHINGTON | $1,029 |
| SPUR LOCAL | $1,023 |
| LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETY | $1,000 |
| SMAYL | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +15% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 13% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CDCOLLEGIATE DIRECTIONS INC2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +15%
- CICOLLEGETRACKS INC2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +6%
- HGHORIZONS GREATER WASHINGTON INC2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +81%
Funded once
- VFVOTER FORMATION PROJECTgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +160%
- MM12one grant, 2023 · $10k
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +1%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.
To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.
We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.
The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…
Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
Ala is the catalyst for growth by providing: diverse educational experiences, engaged peer communities, strategic solutions, dynamic resources, and trusted networks.
Create a more accessible, sustainable, prosperous and livable national capital region by being a discussion forum, expert resource, issue advocate, and catalyst for action.
MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.
The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spur Local Inc and the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds VOTER FORMATION PROJECT ↗
- Who funds GODLY RESPONSE TO ABUSE IN THE ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds PFLAG ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds HOMES NOT BORDERS INC ↗
- Who funds PAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND ↗
- Who funds DC ABORTION FUND ↗
- Who funds COLLEGIATE DIRECTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds COLLEGETRACKS INC ↗
- Who funds HORIZONS GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds SPUR LOCAL INC ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds SMYAL Inc ↗
- Who funds MIRIAM'S KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds DC Greens Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · John Edward Fowler Memorial Foundation · Hattie M Strong Foundation · Crimsonbridge Foundation Inc · Harman Family Foundation · The Webber Family Foundation · Jack Kent Cooke Foundation · Clark Charitable Foundation Inc Dba a James & Alice B Clark Foundation · Impactassetsinc · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Trevelyan Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.