Skip to content

· Public charity

Travis Credit Union

A cooperative, organized for the purpose of promoting thrift andsavings among its members, creating a source of credit for them at rates of interest set by the board of directors, and providing an opportunity for them to use and control their own money on a democratic basis in order to improve their economic and social conditions.

$197k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$65k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$338kHuman Services$250kYouth Development$220kHealth$168kFood & Nutrition$105kCommunity Improvement$100kHousing & Shelter$75kCrime & Legal$60kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $134,100, the rows itemized in this filing. The $196,600 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $62,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $57k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $65k
$11,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.3B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VACAVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$65,000
LEAVEN KIDS$23,000
CHILDRENS MIRACLE NETWORK HOSPITALS$12,500
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION$11,500
NORTHBAY HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION$10,000
MERCED COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION$6,850
SOLANO COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION$5,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $210k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COMMUNITY ACTION NAPA VALLEY: $20k → 9%MULTICULTURAL INSTITUTE: $20k → 10%FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $8k → 10%EMPOWER YOLO INC: $15k → 16%ON THE MOVE: $25k → 10%YOLO CRISIS NURSERY INC: $10k → 16%COCOKIDS INC: $8k → 9%MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $20k → 9%VESTIA INC: $20k → 9%CHILDREN'S NETWORK OF SOLANO COUNTY: $65k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$586k · 10 repeat orgs$810k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
49

Total granted

$586k
$810k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+35%

Still filing today

50%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesFood & NutritionCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TV
    THE VACAVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
    4× · 2020–2024 · $195k · revenue +49%
  • CM
    CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK
    6× · 2017–2024 · $108k · revenue +31%
  • LK
    Leaven Kids
    5× · 2019–2024 · $100k · revenue +110%

Funded once

  • CN
    Childrens Network of Solano County
    one grant, 2020 · $65k · revenue -26%
  • YC
    YOLO COUNTY OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
  • OT
    ON THE MOVE
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Casa of Solano County

Advocates for abused, neglected and other identified children within the court system, with the belief that every child is entitled to a safe and stable home.

Civil Rights
2
Children's Council of San Francisco

By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…

Human Services
3
Community Impact Central Valley

To deliver comprehensive health and human service programs that improve the health and well-being of under-served california residents.

Health
4
Fresno County Economic Opportunities Commission

A community action agency whose mission is to humanely focus all available resources to empower low-income families and individuals working towards the skills, knowledge,and motivation for self-sufficiency. human services and…

Human Services
5
El Concilio California

Empowering diverse communities in california's central valley.

Human Services
6
Council on Aging Services for Seniors

To enhance the quality of life for our aging community by providing services that promote wellbeing and maintain independence.

—
7
Community Action Marin

We make it possible for people in marin to achieve well-being by providing the vital services they need. together, we break down the barriers that get in the way of fair and lasting change in service to better outcomes for all.

Human Services
8
Sierra Nevada Childrens Services

Sierra Nevada Children's Services enhances the community by supporting quality childcare and empowering families to aspire to life-long success.

Human Services
9
West Valley Community Services of Santa Clara County Inc

Our mission is to unite the community to fight hunger and homelessness. our vision is a community where every person has food on the table and every person has a roof over their head.

Housing & Shelter
10
West Contra Costa County Meals On Wheels

Enable frail seniors to maintain their independence at home by providing them with high quality, nutritious meals that are cost effective, prepared in West Contra Costa County, delivered by caring drivers and administered by local…

Food & Nutrition
11
Legal Link

Legal Link removes legal barriers that prolong poverty by adding critically needed capacity to the legal ecosystem.

Crime & Legal
12
Central California Food Bank

Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Contra Costa Family Justice Alliance; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Travis Fisher House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/51
Grantees still filing
38/51
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK: $107,600 · OtherCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORKContra Costa County Office of Education: $41,500 · OtherContra Costa County Office of EducationFriends of Travis Fisher House: $30,000 · OtherTOURO UNIVERSITY: $30,000 · OtherTRAVIS LOGISTICS OFFICER ASSOCIATION: $30,000 · OtherYOLO COUNTY OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES: $30,000 · OtherMERCED COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION: $21,850 · Other+25 more: $350,250 · Other+25 moreTHE VACAVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $195,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE VACAVILLE NE…RYSE INC: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentRYSE INCChildrens Network of Solano County: $65,000 · Human ServicesChildrens Networ…ON THE MOVE: $25,000 · Human ServicesON THE MOVECOMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY: $20,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION…MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $20,000 · Human ServicesMONUMENT CRISIS …MULTICULTURAL INSTITUTE: $20,000 · Human ServicesMULTICULTURAL IN…VESTIA INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesVESTIA INCEmpower Yolo Inc: $15,000 · Human ServicesEmpower Yolo IncYolo Crisis Nursery: $10,000 · Human ServicesCocoKids Inc: $7,500 · Human ServicesFIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $7,500 · Human ServicesLeaven Kids: $99,500 · EducationLeaven Kid…CHILD START INC: $20,000 · EducationCHILD STAR…RICHMOND PROMISE INC: $10,000 · EducationRICHMOND P…FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO: $20,000 · Food & NutritionYOLO FOOD BANK: $20,000 · Food & NutritionTHE MERCED COUNTY FOOD BANK: $20,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS CONTRA COSTA INC: $15,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS YOLO COUNTY: $15,000 · Food & NutritionSTAND FOR FAMILIES FREE OF VIOLENCE: $20,000 · Crime & LegalLEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $20,000 · Crime & LegalYOLO COUNTY CHILDRENS ALLIANCE: $15,000 · Crime & LegalMERCED RESCUE MISSION: $10,000 · Crime & LegalCONTRA COSTA FAMILY JUSTICE ALLIANCE: $10,000 · Crime & LegalSAN PABLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterGREATER NAPA FAIR HOUSING CENTER: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterDAVIS COMMUNITY MEALS: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterVACAVILLE SOLANO SERVICES CORPORATION: $10,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$641,200Youth Development$210,000Human Services$210,000Education$129,500Food & Nutrition$90,000Crime & Legal$75,000Housing & Shelter$65,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE VACAVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $195,000 over 4y, 6.9% of budgetCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK: $107,600 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLeaven Kids: $99,500 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetChildrens Network of Solano County: $65,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetFriends of Travis Fisher House: $30,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetTOURO UNIVERSITY: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetON THE MOVE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSAN PABLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGREATER NAPA FAIR HOUSING CENTER: $20,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetYOLO FOOD BANK: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MERCED COUNTY FOOD BANK: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPuertas Abiertas Community Resource Center: $20,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetSTAND FOR FAMILIES FREE OF VIOLENCE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetVACAVILLE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $20,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetLEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Resources for Children: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWest Contra Costa Public Education Fund: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetVESTIA INC: $20,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS CONTRA COSTA INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWORLDWIDE FOUNDATION FOR CREDIT UNIONS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRichmond Community Foundation: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEmpower Yolo Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRURAL INNOVATIONS IN SOCIAL ECONOMICS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDAVIS COMMUNITY MEALS: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS YOLO COUNTY: $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetRYSE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYOLO COUNTY CHILDRENS ALLIANCE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYolo Crisis Nursery: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetOPPORTUNITY JUNCTION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMERCED RESCUE MISSION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRICHMOND PROMISE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetRUBICON PROGRAMS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCatholic Charities of Yolo-Solano: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetVACAVILLE SOLANO SERVICES CORPORATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetVallejo Chamber of Commerce: $10,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetNAPALEARNS (THE NAPA VALLEY PARTNERSHIP FOR 21ST CENTURY EDUCATION): $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY San Francisco Bay Area: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCONTRA COSTA FAMILY JUSTICE ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNORTHBAY HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL CREDIT UNION FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEast Bay Center for the Performing Arts: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFAIRFIELD-SUISUN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $10,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetMONUMENT IMPACT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCocoKids Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Travis Credit Union's Community Financial Wellness FundCA66.2× affinity29 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Travis Credit Union's Community Financial Wellness Fund · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · East Bay Community Foundation · Dean and Margaret Lesher Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Sutter Valley Hospitals · The California Endowment · United Way of the Bay Area · Contra Costa Regional Health Foundation · Food Bank of Contra Costa and Solano · California Foundation for Stronger Communities · Tipping Point Community

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Travis Credit Union funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Travis Credit Union. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    27report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Travis Credit Union’s filings →

    More from the funding graph