· Public charity
Travis Credit Union's Community Financial Wellness Fund
TRAVIS CREDIT UNION'S COMMUNITY FINANCIAL WELLNESS FUND is committed to building financially empowered communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 3 grants below total $45,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $56,649 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $11,649 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VACAVILLE SOLANO SERVICES CORPORATION | $15,000 |
| SAN PABLO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC | $15,000 |
| SAFEQUEST SOLANO INC | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $394k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Advocates for abused, neglected and other identified children within the court system, with the belief that every child is entitled to a safe and stable home.
Enable frail seniors to maintain their independence at home by providing them with high quality, nutritious meals that are cost effective, prepared in West Contra Costa County, delivered by caring drivers and administered by local…
To enhance the quality of life for our aging community by providing services that promote wellbeing and maintain independence.
The Sonoma County Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) Program serves abused and neglected children coming before the Juvenile Court of Protection and Rehabilitation Services.
Respecting the presence of God among us, we serve, advocate for and empower those in need. In carrying out the social mission of the Roman Catholic Church in the Diocese of Fresno, the Organization provides food, clothing, housing support,…
Address the homeless crisis in California.
Plumas Rural Services is a northeastern California Community Based NPO providing services and opportunities for the well-being of local residents and families to improve quality of life and self sufficiency by promoting health, education,…
Work together to improve the lives of children, youth, and families in our communities.the childrens alliance is an inter-agency collaborative, which coordinates needed family support services,convenes child and family advocates to solve…
Resources and Community Advocacy. Serving low income youth and families in the community. Providing culturally competent and sensitivie programing based on based on the needs and resources available in Santa Clara County.
The Latino Commission provides a multitude of services throughout the counties of San Francisco, San Mateo, and Tulare. The Organization currently employs twelve programs eight for adults, and four for youth and transitional age youth…
City of Refuge Sacramento, a community-based organization, exists to support people living in marginalized communities of Sacramento and to empower their ability to create a personal transformation that will lead to a healthy and thriving…
To Provide a benefit to the public by providing work related training and job placement services to low income adults and youth (ages 16-24 yrs).
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Contra Costa Family Justice Alliance and the most unlike its peers is Fairfield Police Activities League. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
66 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 66 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NORTHBAY HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YOLO FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds NAPA VALLEY FARMWORKER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RIO VISTA CARE INC ↗
- Who funds STAND FOR FAMILIES FREE OF VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds AGLANTIS ↗
- Who funds Yolo Crisis Nursery ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS DIABLO REGION ↗
- Who funds Yolo Wayfarer Center Christian Fourth and Hope ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY JUNCTION INC ↗
- Who funds THE YOLO INTERFAITH IMMIGRATION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds THE 100 CLUB OF SOLANO AND YOLO COUNTIES ↗
- Who funds UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF THE NORTH BAY INC ↗
- Who funds 10000 DEGREES ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO ↗
- Who funds CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY San Francisco Bay Area ↗
- Who funds Loaves and Fishes of Contra Costa ↗
- Who funds Leaven Kids ↗
- Who funds NAPALEARNS (THE NAPA VALLEY PARTNERSHIP FOR 21ST CENTURY EDUCATION) ↗
- Who funds East Bay Center for the Performing Arts ↗
- Who funds THE VACAVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB ↗
- Who funds RURAL INNOVATIONS IN SOCIAL ECONOMICS INC ↗
- Who funds Community Resources for Children ↗
- Who funds Empower Yolo Inc ↗
- Who funds TRINITY CENTER WALNUT CREEK ↗
- Who funds BENICIA COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS YOLO COUNTY ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS CONTRA COSTA INC ↗
- Who funds DIXON FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds CONTRA COSTA FAMILY JUSTICE ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds CHILD ADVOCATES OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds DAVIS COMMUNITY MEALS ↗
- Who funds West Contra Costa Public Education Fund ↗
- Who funds CONSERVATION CORPS NORTH BAY INC ↗
- Who funds FAIRFIELD POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds ON THE MOVE ↗
- Who funds MULTICULTURAL INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds VACAVILLE SOLANO SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Travis Credit Union · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Solano Community Foundation · United Way of the Bay Area · East Bay Community Foundation · Dean and Margaret Lesher Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · California Foundation for Stronger Communities · Syar Foundation Susan L Syar Director · The California Wellness Foundation · Justice Justice Foundation · Tipping Point Community
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Travis Credit Union's Community Financial Wellness Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Travis Credit Union's Community Financial Wellness Fund?
Find your warmest path to Travis Credit Union's Community Financial Wellness Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.