Skip to content

· Private foundation

Traub-Brittan Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$261k
Granted FY2025still arriving
34
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Religion$265kHealth$257kArts & Culture$236kRecreation & Sports$213kPhilanthropy$180kEducation$118kAnimals$114kPublic Safety & Disaster$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k26 grants · $65k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $126k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$2,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SINAI TEMPLE$69,843
CALIFORNIA REHABILITATION FOUNDATION$30,000
CEDARS-SINAI$26,000
MACCABI WORLD UNION INC$20,000
CENTRAL COAST POLO CLUB$15,000
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
POLO PONY RESCUE INC$10,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL PHILHARMONIC$9,600
THE MUSIC CENTER$7,000
THE MAPLE COUNSELING CENTER$6,000
TOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION$5,000
CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH FOUNDATION$5,000
CENTER THEATRE GROUP$5,000
PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION$3,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MARINE CORPS HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
OR
PA
CA
VA
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 39 repeat orgs$94k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

39 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
25

Total granted

$1.3M
$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+8%

Still filing today

56%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthRecreation & SportsArts & CultureAnimalsPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    POLO PONY RESCUE INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $108k · revenue +63% · 32% of their budget
  • WR
    WILL ROGERS POLO CLUB INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $61k · revenue +23%
  • MC
    MILKEN COMMUNITY SCHOOL
    2× · 2022–2023 · $50k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • TL
    THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
  • CB
    CHILDREN'S BURN FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue +244%
  • MU
    MACCABI USA INC
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
2
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
3
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
4
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

—
5
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
6
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
7
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
8
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
9
Naval Postgraduate School Foundation Inc

Our mission is to support the naval postgraduate school by providing funding and programmatic support for education, research, technology development, institutional initiatives, and community programs that advance national security and…

Education
10
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
11
The Jonsson Cancer Center Foundation

The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.

—
12
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The J Paul Getty Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
48/49
Grantees still filing
32/49
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SINAI TEMPLE: $212,385 · OtherSINAI TEMPLETHE JEWISH FEDERATION: $170,000 · OtherTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONLA OPERA: $63,410 · OtherLA OPERAREGENERATIVE MEDICINE INSTITUTE: $55,000 · OtherREGENERATIVE MEDICINE INSTITUTEMILKEN COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $50,000 · OtherMILKEN COMMUNITY SCHOOLTHE MAPLE COUNSELING CENTER: $49,500 · OtherTHE MAPLE COUNSELING CENTERTHE MUSIC CENTER: $34,000 · OtherTHE J PAUL GETTY TRUST: $39,113 · Other+45 more: $188,859 · Other+45 moreCALIFORNIA REHABILITATION FOUNDATION: $50,000 · HealthCALIFORNI…CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $32,700 · HealthCEDARS-SI…TOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $32,500 · HealthTOWER CAN…CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Health+4 more: $4,300 · HealthMACCABI WORLD UNION INC: $120,000 · Youth DevelopmentMACCABI W…POLO PONY RESCUE INC: $108,379 · Animals+2 more: $1,500 · AnimalsWILL ROGERS POLO CLUB INC: $61,000 · Recreation & SportsCENTRAL COAST POLO CLUB: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsPOLO TRAINING FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Recreation & SportsMACCABI USA INC: $6,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE LOS ANGELES DODGERS FOUNDATION: $3,914 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $2,550 · Recreation & SportsTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $60,000 · EducationWINDWARD SCHOOL: $20,000 · Education+2 more: $2,000 · EducationCENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES: $41,000 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $25,000 · Arts & CultureAmerican Friends of Israel Philharmonic Orchestra: $10,100 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $3,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$862,267Health$124,500Youth Development$120,000Animals$109,879Recreation & Sports$95,964Education$82,000Arts & Culture$79,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMACCABI WORLD UNION INC: $120,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetPOLO PONY RESCUE INC: $108,379 over 5y, 32% of budgetWILL ROGERS POLO CLUB INC: $61,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $60,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMILKEN COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA REHABILITATION FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 35% of budgetTHE MAPLE COUNSELING CENTER: $49,500 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetCENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES: $41,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE J PAUL GETTY TRUST: $39,113 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $32,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $32,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILLOWS COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $21,669 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWINDWARD SCHOOL: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL COAST POLO CLUB: $15,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetAmerican Friends of Israel Philharmonic Orchestra: $10,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOLO TRAINING FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S BURN FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMACCABI USA INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPacific Legal Foundation: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHCARE FOR ISRAEL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetAMERICAN YOUTH SYMPHONY INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE LOS ANGELES DODGERS FOUNDATION: $3,914 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM ASSOCIATES: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTUALITY HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCharity Fair Horse Show: $1,545 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILL ROGERS RANCH FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetLOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYoung America's Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetParkinson Research Foundation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEVIL PUPS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MACCABI WORLD UNION INC ↗
  • Who funds POLO PONY RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds WILL ROGERS POLO CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds MILKEN COMMUNITY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA REHABILITATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE MAPLE COUNSELING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds THE J PAUL GETTY TRUST ↗
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE WILLOWS COMMUNITY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds WINDWARD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL COAST POLO CLUB ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Israel Philharmonic Orchestra ↗
  • Who funds POLO TRAINING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S BURN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds MACCABI USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Pacific Legal Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHCARE FOR ISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN YOUTH SYMPHONY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ahmanson FoundationCA13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ahmanson Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · California Community Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Traub-Brittan Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Traub-Brittan Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Tuality Healthcare Foundation: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 80 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Traub-Brittan Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph