Skip to content
Transport Workers Union of Greater New York Local 100 at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Transport Workers Union of Greater New York Local 100

The betterment of working conditions for twu local 100 membership.

$234k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$114kHealth$103kPublic Benefit$79kArts & Culture$72kEnvironment$60kHuman Services$53kCommunity Improvement$52kCivil Rights$49kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $147,446, the rows itemized in this filing. The $233,800 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $86,354 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $102k
$9,750
Median grant
2
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$30,000
SESAME FLYERS INTERNATIONAL$25,000
SOMOS LA RECUPERATION (SOMOS INC)$23,400
TWU OF AMERICA$13,546
NAACP NEW YORK BRANCH$10,000
LCLAA - WESTCHESTER CHAPTER$9,750
MANHATTAN AND BRONX SURFACE TRANSIT OPERATING AUTHORITY$9,000
IRISH ECHO NEWSPAPER CORP$7,700
MAKE THE GRADE FOUNDATION INC$7,500
COALITION OF BLACK TRADE UNIONISTS-NYC$5,900
ERIC INITIATIVE FOUNDATION$5,650
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $81k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BED-STUY CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER: $9k → 20%BED-STUY CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER: $7k → 20%BED-STUY CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER: $5k → 20%CLIMATE JOBS NY: $25k → 17%CLIMATE JOBS NY: $25k → 17%CLIMATE JOBS NY: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$440k · 14 repeat orgs$308k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
17

Total granted

$440k
$269k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+16%

Still filing today

71%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsEducationEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA
    6× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +34%
  • CJ
    CLIMATE JOBS NY INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $60k · revenue +616% · 26% of their budget
  • SI
    SOMOS INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $53k · revenue ×12

Funded once

  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY - MAKING STRIDES
    2× · 2021–2022 · $50k
  • NY
    NEW YORKERS AGAINST CORRUPTION
    one grant, 2017 · $40k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Federation of Labor & Cong of Industrial Orgs Nyc Bldg % Const

Liason for organized labor in the new york city area.

—
2
Professional Staff Congress Cuny

Psc is a labor union that represents nearly 30,000 active and retired faculty and staff at cuny and the cuny research foundation. the psc's mission is to advance the professional lives of our members, enhance their terms and conditions of…

—
3
Council On American-Islamic Relations of New York

Through legal advocacy, education, media relations, civic engagement and grassroots mobilzation, cair-ny empowers the american muslim community against discrimination.

Civil Rights
4
Central Labor Council New York City Afl-Cio

To foster sisterhood and brotherhood between local unions having jurisdiction in whole or in part within the city of new york so that they may work jointly towards the advancement and elevation of the labor movement.

—
5
International Union of Police Associations Afl-Cio

Labor union of law enforcement officers

—
6
Columbia Association of the Nypd Inc

See schedule othe purpose of the association is to promote awareness of people of italian american heritage to participate in educational, ethnic, cultural, law enforcement, and community activities. in addition, the association will…

Human Services
7
Correction Officers' Benevolent Associat

To organize and represent employees of the new york city corrections department in contract negotiation matters.

Employment
8
New Yorkers for Fiscal Fairness Inc

Provide advocacy for lower and working class new yorkers

—
9
The American Assembly

A national non partisan public policy forum to illuminate issues of public policy.

—
10
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 302

Member representation and collective bargaining

—
11
Association for a Better New York Inc

The association for a better new york, inc.'s (the organization") primary exempt purpose is to promote the economic climate of new york city and stimulate the interests of its citizens.

—
12
The City University of New York School of Law Foundation Inc

The foundation supports the law school in its mission to increase access to legal education to those from groups underrepresented in the profession and to prepare its graduates for public interest and public service practice.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Harlem Week Inc; the most unlike its peers is Combermere Alumni Association Usa I. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
13/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA: $80,394 · OtherTRANSPORT WORKERS UNION OF AMERICASOMOS INC: $53,400 · OtherSOMOS INCAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY - MAKING STRIDES: $50,000 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY - MAKING STRIDESNEW YORKERS AGAINST CORRUPTION: $40,000 · OtherNEW YORKERS AGAINST CORRUPTIONIndividual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCITY AND STATE NY LLC: $27,500 · OtherCITY AND STATE NY LLCSAATE: $17,270 · OtherNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE: $17,000 · OtherAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST INDIES INC: $16,250 · Other+14 more: $123,590 · Other+14 moreCLIMATE JOBS NY INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesCLIMATE JOBS…THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER INC: $20,500 · Human ServicesTHE CAMPAIGN…SESAME FLYERS INTERNATIONAL INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureSESAME FLY…NATIONAL PUERTO RICAN DAY PARADE INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL P…DOMINICAN DAY PARADE INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureDOMINICAN …AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $47,500 · HealthTJ MARTELL FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthMake the Grade Foundation: $37,500 · EducationLABOR COUNCIL FOR LATIN AMERICAN ADVANCEMENT: $16,750 · Civil RightsERIC INITIATIVE FOUNDATION INC: $5,650 · Civil RightsCommunity Voices Heard Inc: $20,000 · Employment
Other$465,404Human Services$80,500Arts & Culture$70,000Health$52,500Education$37,500Civil Rights$22,400Employment$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRANSPORT WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA: $80,394 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCLIMATE JOBS NY INC: $60,000 over 3y, 26% of budgetSOMOS INC: $53,400 over 4y, 8.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $47,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMake the Grade Foundation: $37,500 over 6y, 28% of budgetSESAME FLYERS INTERNATIONAL INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL PUERTO RICAN DAY PARADE INC: $25,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetTHE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER INC: $20,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDOMINICAN DAY PARADE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetLABOR COUNCIL FOR LATIN AMERICAN ADVANCEMENT: $16,750 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST INDIES INC: $16,250 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetHARLEM WEEK INC: $15,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCOALITION OF BLACK TRADE UNIONISTS: $11,700 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetLOCAL UNION NO 3 OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMANHATTAN AND BRONX SURFACE TRANSIT OPERATING AUTHORITY: $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPolice Conference of New York Inc: $7,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetERIC INITIATIVE FOUNDATION INC: $5,650 over 1y, 3.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

1199 Seiu United Heal…Montefiore Medical Ce…Somos Healthcare Prov…Local Initiatives Sup…American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
1199 Seiu United Healthcare Workers EastNY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: 1199 Seiu United Healthcare Workers East · Montefiore Medical Center · Somos Healthcare Providers Inc · Local Initiatives Support Corporation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Transport Workers Union of Greater New York Local 100 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Transport Workers Union of Greater New York Local 100. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Transport Workers Union of Greater New York Local 100’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home