Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Transplant Foundation

To support organ and tissue donation and transplantation.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$647k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$7.3MEducation$255kScience & Tech$241k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 10 grants below total $1,090,370 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,187,642 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $97,272 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $122k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $321k
  • $250k+1 grant · $647k
$37,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$71M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRANSPLANT HOUSE$646,794
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION$141,434
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF TRANSPLANTATION$100,000
TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$79,680
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF TRANSPLANT SURGEONS$37,500
CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SERVICES INC$25,000
THE NEMOURS FOUNDATION$22,403
LEHIGH VALLEY HOSPITAL$17,559
GEISINGER HEALTH FOUNDATION$10,000
UPMC PINNACLE HEALTH SYSTEM$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 96% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SERVICES INC: $25k → 10%LANKENAU M L HOSPITAL: $15k → 7%MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 9%GEISINGER HEALTH FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%TRIO PHILADELPHIA: $25k → 10%MILTON S HERSHEY MEDICAL CTR: $25k → 12%JUNIATA COLLEGE: $100k → 13%TRANSPLANT HOUSE: $1.6M → 22%AMERICAN SOCIETY OF TRANSPLANTATION: $100k → 7%AMERICAN SOCIETY OF TRANSPLANT SURGEONS: $38k → 7%THE NEMOURS FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 9%MILTON S HERSHEY MEDICAL CENTER: $24k → 12%TRANSPLANT HOUSE: $653k → 22%AMERICAN SOCIETY OF TRANSPLANTATION: $50k → 7%THE NEMOURS FOUNDATION: $22k → 10%UPMC PINNACLE HEALTH SYSTEM: $17k → 12%TRANSPLANT HOUSE: $647k → 22%AMERICAN SOCIETY OF TRANSPLANTATION: $38k → 7%CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $13k → 10%UPMC PINNACLE HEALTH SYSTEM: $10k → 12%TRANSPLANT HOUSE: $634k → 22%AMERICAN SOCIETY OF TRANSPLANTATION: $25k → 7%DELAWARE HEALTH EQUITY COALITION: $25k → 10%PINNACLE HEALTH SYSTEMS: $9k → 12%TRANSPLANT HOUSE: $584k → 22%CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SYSTEM: $25k → 10%PENN STATE HEALTH: $10k → 12%TRANSPLANT HOUSE: $580k → 22%CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SYSTEM: $25k → 10%PINNACLE HEALTH SYSTEMS: $9k → 12%TRANSPLANT HOUSE: $561k → 22%CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SYSTEM: $20k → 10%TRANSPLANT HOUSE: $545k → 22%TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $199k → 22%TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $100k → 22%TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $99k → 22%TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $80k → 22%TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $50k → 22%TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $10k → 22%THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSP: $25k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.9M · 12 repeat orgs$313k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
7

Total granted

$6.9M
$240k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+42%

Still filing today

75%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $73k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    TRANSPLANT HOUSE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $5.9M · revenue +23% · 44% of their budget
  • TU
    Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education
    2× · 2023–2024 · $227k · revenue +16%
  • AS
    American Society Of Transplantation
    4× · 2020–2024 · $213k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • JC
    JUNIATA COLLEGE
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +24%
  • TO
    TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYL-
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • DH
    DELAWARE HEALTH EMPOWERMENT COALITION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +369%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Highmark Health Group

Working as an integrated system within highmark health, employees at all of ahn's care sites, including hospitals, health + wellness pavilions, primary and specialty care offices and more, are committed to improving health and promoting…

2
Philadelphia University

The organization is an affiliate within thomas jefferson university/jefferson health; a comprehensive professional university and tax-exempt integrated healthcare delivery system ("system"), with a tripartite mission of education, research…

Education
3
Upmc Group

Healthcare, education, and research

4
Temple University Hospital Inc

See Schedule OOur mission is to support Temple University and its Health Sciences Center academic programs by providing the clinical environment and service to support the highest quality teaching and training programs for health care…

Health
5
Holy Redeemer Health System

As a catholic health system, rooted in the tradition of the sisters of the holy redeemer, we care, comfort and heal, following the example of jesus, proclaiming the hope god offers in the midst of human struggle.

Health
6
Upmc Carlisle

Upmc carlisle's mission is to serve the community by providing access to outstanding patient care and to shape tomorrow's health care system through clinical and technological innovation, research and education.

Health
7
Pinnacle Health Medical Services

Pinnacle health medical services is a charitable organization dedicated to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all the people of central pennsylvania by providing primary, clinic, family and specialty physician…

Health
8
Geisinger Medical Center

Strive to make better health easier by providing access to affordable, high quality health services through equitable, innovative, and inclusive care models that support patient care, education, research, & community services.

Health
9
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
10
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
11
Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals Inc

Thomas jefferson university hospitals, inc. ("tjuh") is dedicated to improving the health of the communities we serve. we are committed to: 1) setting the standard for excellence in the delivery of patient care, patient safety and the…

Health
12
Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation

Johns hopkins health system corporation provides centralized management of a multi-hospital healthcare system. it is a key component of johns hopkins medicine, a collaboration with the johns hopkins university school of medicine.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Milton S Hershey Medical Center and the most unlike its peers is American Society of Transplant Surgeons. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
15/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TRANSPLANT HOUSE — $5,852,742 · HealthTRANSPLANT HOUSE+11 more — $542,487 · Health+11 moreTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $537,556 · EducationTRUSTEES OF …Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education — $227,248 · EducationTemple Unive…JUNIATA COLLEGE — $100,000 · EducationJUNIATA COLL…+1 more — $25,000 · EducationAmerican Society Of Transplantation — $212,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF PA — $103,100 · OtherCHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $82,689 · OtherTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYL- — $25,000 · OtherDELAWARE HEALTH EMPOWERMENT COALITION INC — $25,000 · OtherTRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION INC — $25,000 · Other+1 more — $14,000 · Other
Health$6,395,229Education$889,804Other$487,289

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTRANSPLANT HOUSE — $5,852,742 over 8y, 44% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $537,556 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education — $227,248 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Society Of Transplantation — $212,500 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetLEHIGH VALLEY HOSPITAL — $110,529 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEMOURS FOUNDATION — $107,859 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIATA COLLEGE — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $82,689 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetTHE MILTON S HERSHEY MEDICAL CENTER — $58,835 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUPMC PINNACLE HOSPITALS — $45,259 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Society of Transplant Surgeons — $37,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SERVICES INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDELAWARE HEALTH EMPOWERMENT COALITION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEISINGER CLINIC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREADING HOSPITAL — $20,322 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMain Line Hospitals Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEISINGER HEALTH — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Reach Out and Read IncMA12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Reach Out and Read Inc · Johns Hopkins University · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Transplant Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 34%
  • Christiana Care Health System Inc43% of income from government
  • Delaware Health Empowerment Coalition Inc34% of income from government
  • Christiana Care Health Services Inc1% of income from government
  • The Nemours Foundation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Transplant Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Transplant Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph