· Public charity
Tr Uw Otto Luedeking
Trust assets are invested to provide income to be distributed to the charities named in the governing document.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 14 grants below total $353,400 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $716,773 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $363,373 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k13 grants · $293k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $61k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MAPLE KNOLL COMMUNITIES | $60,561 |
| BEECH ACRES PARENTING CENTER | $40,374 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $40,374 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FNDN | $40,374 |
| CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER | $20,204 |
| THE CHILDRENS HOME OF CINCINNATI OHIO INC | $20,204 |
| YWCA OF GREATER CINCINNATI | $20,204 |
| CINCINNATI FDTN FOR THE AGED | $20,204 |
| EMANUEL COMMUNITY CENTER | $20,204 |
| CLOVERNOOK CENTER FOR THE BLIND | $20,204 |
| BEECHWOOD HOME | $20,187 |
| GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION | $10,102 |
| OHIO HUMANE SOCIETY FAMILIES FORWARD | $10,102 |
| ST JOHNS UNITARIAN CHURCH | $10,102 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Grants abroad, by region — $363k on the FY2025 return
Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT 0 0 0 GENERAL OPERATING 0 0 0 PROJECT/PROGRAM SUPPORT 0 0 0 GENERAL OPERATING 0 0 0 PROJECT/PROGRAM SUPPORT 0 0 0 GENERAL OPERATING/SUPPORT 0 0 0 GENERAL OPERATING 0 0 0 GENERAL OPERATING 0 0 0 GENERAL OPERATING 0 0 0 PROJECT/PROGRAM SUPPORT 0 0 0 GENERAL OPERATING 0 0 0 GENERAL OPERATING 0 0 0 PROJECT/PROGRAM SUPPORT 0 0 0 ANNUAL FUND 0 0 0 GENERAL OPERATING 0 0 0
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
17 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MKMAPLE KNOLL COMMUNITIES INC6× · 2020–2025 · $347k · revenue +7%
- BABEECH ACRES6× · 2020–2025 · $231k · revenue +3%
- TUTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION4× · 2022–2025 · $157k · revenue +3%
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Cleveland Christian Home, Inc. exists to be a haven of hope for children, youth, and families struggling with mental illness, abuse, and neglect in Northeast Ohio.
Improve the health of our community and create patient value by providing exceptional outcomes and the finest experiences, all in an affordable way.
To ensure people with mental illness, addiction, and related challenges lead healthy and productive lives.
To strengthen the communities we serve through programs and services that inspire and inform, educate and engage, fostering citizenship and culture, the joy of learning and the power of diverse perspectives.
The mission of the christ hospital foundation ('tch fdn') is to support the mission of the christ hospital ('tch'). tch's mission is to improve the health of our community and create patient value by providing exceptional outcomes and the…
The purpose of convalescent hospital fund for children is to provide financial support and otherwise operate for the benefit and support of cincinnati children's hospital medical center. cincinnati children's hospital medical center's…
Ucp organizes, manages, and delivers the clinical activities and professional medical services of the faculty of the university of cincinnati college of medicine.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital Medical Center and the most unlike its peers is The Cincinnati Foundation for the Aged. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MAPLE KNOLL COMMUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds BEECH ACRES ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CINCINNATI FOUNDATION FOR THE AGED ↗
- Who funds YWCA of Greater Cincinnati ↗
- Who funds Clovernook Center For the Blind and Visually Impaired ↗
- Who funds Emanuel Community Center DBA Cincinnati Squash Academy ↗
- Who funds The Children's Home of Cincinnati Ohio ↗
- Who funds BEECHWOOD HOME ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S PROTECTIVE SERVICE OF THE OHIO HUMANE SOCIETY DBA FAMILIESFORWARD ↗
- Who funds THE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Childrens Hospital ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · The Thomas J Emery Memorial · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Unnewehr Family Foundation · Hcs Foundation · L & L Nippert Charitable Foundation Inc Attn Carter F Randolph Phd · Jack J Smith Jr Charitable Trust · Sutphin Family Foundation Ica · Louise Taft Semple Foundation · Andrew Jergens Foundation · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tr Uw Otto Luedeking funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.