Skip to content

Ohio · Public charity

Tr Uw Otto Luedeking

Trust assets are invested to provide income to be distributed to the charities named in the governing document.

$717k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
14
Itemized grants FY2025
13
Organizations funded FY2024
0%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$353k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$20,204
Largest grant, FY2025
$60,561
Organizations funded a year
13 to 13
FY2020 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$13M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations Tr Uw Otto Luedeking funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving13$343k0%
FY202413$314k0%
FY202313$323k0%
FY202213$359k31%
FY202113$291k0%
FY202013$316kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$1.2MHealth$504kRecreation & Sports$116kEducation$74kPhilanthropy$58kReligion$58kAnimals$39k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 17 grantees
All grantees of Tr Uw Otto Luedeking by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Maple Knoll Communities Inc$346,55360%
Beech Acres$231,03560%
The Salvation Army$157,4644n/a
The University of Cincinnati Foundation$157,46440%
YWCA of Greater Cincinnati$115,61660%
The Children's Home of Cincinnati Ohio$115,61660%
The Cincinnati Foundation for the Aged$115,61661%
Emanuel Community Center DBA Cincinnati Squash Academy$115,61666%
Clovernook Center For the Blind and Visually Impaired$115,61660%
Beechwood Home$115,52160%
Children's Hospital Medical Center$78,79940%
Salvation Army National Corp$73,5712n/a
The Children's Protective Service of the Ohio Humane Society Dba Familiesforward$57,80961%
University of Cincinnati$55,3982n/a
St Johns Lutheran Church$39,4004n/a
The Childrens Hospital$36,81720%
St John's Unitarian Universalist Church$18,4092n/a

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Tr Uw Otto Luedeking supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMaple Knoll Communities Inc: $346,553 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBeech Acres: $231,035 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetThe University of Cincinnati Foundation: $157,464 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYWCA of Greater Cincinnati: $115,616 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetThe Children's Home of Cincinnati Ohio: $115,616 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetThe Cincinnati Foundation for the Aged: $115,616 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetEmanuel Community Center DBA Cincinnati Squash Academy: $115,616 over 6y, 6.1% of budgetClovernook Center For the Blind and Visually Impaired: $115,616 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetBeechwood Home: $115,521 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetChildren's Hospital Medical Center: $78,799 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Children's Protective Service of the Ohio Humane Society Dba Familiesforward: $57,809 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetThe Childrens Hospital: $36,817 over 2y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 12.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH17.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · The Thomas J Emery Memorial · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Unnewehr Family Foundation · Hcs Foundation · L & L Nippert Charitable Foundation Inc Attn Carter F Randolph Phd · Jack J Smith Jr Charitable Trust · Sutphin Family Foundation Ica · Louise Taft Semple Foundation · Andrew Jergens Foundation · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Tr Uw Otto Luedeking with peer funders

About Tr Uw Otto Luedeking

How much does Tr Uw Otto Luedeking give?
Tr Uw Otto Luedeking reported 14 itemized grants totaling $353,400, out of $716,773 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 13 and 13 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2024.
What does Tr Uw Otto Luedeking fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2025, its largest causes are Human Services (58%), Health (25%), Recreation & Sports (6%).
Who are Tr Uw Otto Luedeking's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2025: Maple Knoll Communities Inc ($347k), Beech Acres ($231k), The Salvation Army ($157k).
Does Tr Uw Otto Luedeking fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Tr Uw Otto Luedeking?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Greater Cincinnati Foundation, The Thomas J Emery Memorial, Ge Aerospace Foundation.
Where is Tr Uw Otto Luedeking based?
Tr Uw Otto Luedeking is based in OH.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tr Uw Otto Luedeking’s filings →

More from the funding graph