Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Town Branch Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30M
Granted FY2024still arriving
63
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$3.9M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Philanthropy$53MArts & Culture$30MEducation$27MCommunity Improvement$18MRecreation & Sports$14MEnvironment$4.9MSocial Science$800kYouth Development$413kOther$0
02FY2024 · 63 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $53k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $268k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $1.5M
  • $250k+34 grants · $28M
$250,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$500M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Peel Compton Foundation$3,854,715
The Peel Compton Foundation$2,572,229
Individual grant recipient$2,000,000
Heartland Forward Inc$1,661,880
Tulsa Community Foundation$1,440,000
TNTP Inc$1,320,148
Oklahoma Public School Resource Center Inc$1,000,030
Arkansas Public School Resource Center Inc$849,000
University of Arkansas Foundation Inc$833,333
The Peel Compton Foundation$750,000
Walton Family Foundation Inc$733,012
Arkansas Public School Resource Center Inc$702,500
Phalen Leadership Academies Indiana Inc$695,000
University of Arkansas Foundation Inc$623,324
Oklahoma Public School Resource Center Inc$620,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $298k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Grayson County Shelter: $9k → 11%COOKSON HILLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $40k → 18%GRAYSON COUNTY SHELTER: $9k → 11%Cookson Hills Christian School Inc: $40k → 18%Grayson County Shelter: $9k → 11%Cookson Hills Christian School Inc: $40k → 18%Cookson Hills Christian School Inc: $40k → 18%Cookson Hills Christian School Inc: $40k → 18%Cookson Hills Christian School Inc: $40k → 18%Texoma Family Shelter Inc: $8k → 11%Texoma Family Shelter Inc: $8k → 11%GRAYSON COUNTY SHELTER: $8k → 11%Texoma Family Shelter Inc: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
NY
MA
CA
MO
VA
MD
AR
NC
DC
OK
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 9% of Town Branch Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 84% of the giving stays in AR; read by stated purpose it is 75% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Town Branch Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.3% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$132M · 34 repeat orgs$13M to everyone else

34 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
12

Total granted

$132M
$4.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+20%

Still filing today

82%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyEnvironmentHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    Heartland Forward Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $17M · revenue +20% · 50% of their budget
  • OP
    OKLAHOMA PUBLIC SCHOOL RESOURCE CENTER
    2× · 2023–2024 · $8.8M · revenue +48% · 78% of their budget
  • AP
    ARKANSAS PUBLIC SCHOOL RESOURCE CENTER
    2× · 2023–2024 · $4.3M · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • SS
    SCHOOL SMART KC INC
    one grant, 2023 · $2.3M · revenue +20% · 28% of their budget
  • CR
    CRISTO REY OKLAHOMA CITY CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2023 · $599k
  • AO
    ASSOCIATION OF MISSOURI CHARTER SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2023 · $570k · revenue -39%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Opportunity Arkansas Foundation

Renewing the land of opportunity by simplifying government and solving generational problems for the next generation.

Philanthropy
2
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
3
Tulsa Legacy Charter School

To prepare students for college through a rigorous arts infused program.

Education
4
Arkansas Education Association

Advocate for educational professionals and unite our members and the state to fulfill the promise of public education to prepare every student to succeed in a diverse and interdependent world.

Education
5
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc

To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
7
Arkansas Community Foundation Inc

Arkansas community foundation engages people, connects resources and inspires solutions to build community.

Philanthropy
8
Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families

Advocating for the development and implementation of data-driven public policy that improves child well-being in arkansas, with a focus on economic security, education, health, early childhood, child welfare, juvenile justice, and racial…

Human Services
9
Missouri Western State University Foundation Inc

The missouri western state university foundation is a not-for-profit charitable organization that functions solely to support the mission of missouri western state university, as stated in the university's mission statement. the foundation…

10
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
11
Ashland University

Ashland university, guided by our christian heritage, is a comprehensive, private university that provides a transformative learning experience, shaping graduates who work, serve and lead with integrity in their local, national, and global…

Education
12
The State Chamber Research Foundation

The State Chamber Research Foundation strives to support Oklahoma's growth and increase prosperity for all Oklahomans. We create solution orientated programming, advance research and policy, and provide sound data geared to advancing…

Unclassified

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Arkansas Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Peel Compton Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Independent K-12 SchoolsYouth Development CentersCancer Support ServicesAnimal Rescue and ShelterFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Health Access Advocacy and …Community College Foundatio…Policy Research and AdvocacyCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%2%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr14%24%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr19%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr14%13%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr14%48%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr19%4%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/51
the rest of the field
15%
2,092/14,029

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
47/48
Grantees still filing
28/48
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Walton Family Foundation Inc — $30,104,340 · PhilanthropyWalton Family Foundation …TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,710,000 · PhilanthropyTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATIO…+2 more — $350,000 · PhilanthropyCrystal Bridges-Museum of American Art Inc — $30,000,000 · Arts & CultureCrystal Bridges-Museum…The Peel Compton Foundation — $19,659,290 · OtherThe Peel Compton Found…Individual grant recipient — $2,570,120 · OtherIndividual grant recip…Individual grant recipient — $1,826,768 · OtherIndividual grant recip…+32 more — $4,861,397 · Other+32 moreOKLAHOMA PUBLIC SCHOOL RESOURCE CENTER — $8,793,648 · EducationOKLAHOMA PUBLIC SCH…ARKANSAS PUBLIC SCHOOL RESOURCE CENTER — $4,292,571 · EducationARKANSAS PUBLIC SCH…UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC — $2,542,468 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ARKAN…SCHOOL SMART KC INC — $2,348,566 · EducationSCHOOL SMART KC INCDOVE SCHOOLS INC — $1,700,000 · EducationDOVE SCHOOLS INCTNTP INC — $1,320,148 · Education+11 more — $4,090,752 · Education+11 moreHeartland Forward Inc — $16,814,069 · Community ImprovementHeartland For…+1 more — $350,000 · Community ImprovementBENTONVILLE BELLA VISTA TRAILBLAZERS — $11,079,146 · Recreation & SportsNORTHWEST ARKANSAS LAND TRUST — $3,117,883 · EnvironmentWATERSHED CONSERVATION RESOURCE CENTER — $308,194 · Environment+1 more — $116,720 · Environment
Philanthropy$33,164,340Arts & Culture$30,000,000Other$28,917,575Education$25,088,153Community Improvement$17,164,069Recreation & Sports$11,079,146Environment$3,542,797

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWalton Family Foundation Inc — $30,104,340 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetCrystal Bridges-Museum of American Art Inc — $30,000,000 over 3y, 9.8% of budgetThe Peel Compton Foundation — $19,659,290 over 5y, 83% of budgetHeartland Forward Inc — $16,814,069 over 4y, 50% of budgetBENTONVILLE BELLA VISTA TRAILBLAZERS — $11,079,146 over 3y, 42% of budgetOKLAHOMA PUBLIC SCHOOL RESOURCE CENTER — $8,793,648 over 2y, 78% of budgetARKANSAS PUBLIC SCHOOL RESOURCE CENTER — $4,292,571 over 2y, 13% of budgetNORTHWEST ARKANSAS LAND TRUST — $3,117,883 over 2y, 57% of budgetTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,710,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC — $2,542,468 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSCHOOL SMART KC INC — $2,348,566 over 1y, 28% of budgetDOVE SCHOOLS INC — $1,700,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetTNTP INC — $1,320,148 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $933,618 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHARDING CHARTER PREPARATORY SCHOOL DISTRICT — $795,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetPHALEN LEADERSHIP ACADEMY - INDIANA — $695,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH — $650,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetASSOCIATION OF MISSOURI CHARTER SCHOOLS — $569,600 over 1y, 17% of budgetShow Me KC Schools Inc — $488,200 over 1y, 49% of budgetBELLWETHER EDUCATION PARTNERS INC — $390,837 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSANTA FE SOUTH SCHOOLS INC — $360,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetARKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC — $358,125 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNORTHWEST ARKANSAS COUNCIL FOUNDATION — $350,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetADVANCE RURAL EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $330,000 over 1y, 44% of budgetWATERSHED CONSERVATION RESOURCE CENTER — $308,194 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE — $255,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetInstitute for Humane Studies — $240,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCOOKSON HILLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC — $240,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetMARYLAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC — $128,700 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $116,720 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTERS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC — $103,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNorthwest Arkansas Community College Foundation Inc — $98,365 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetEXODUSLIFE — $60,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetHOME HOSPICE OF GRAYSON COUNTY INC — $58,125 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTexoma Family Shelter — $58,125 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MILKEN INSTITUTE — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $45,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL GRAYSON COUNTY — $41,250 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetGRAYSON COUNTY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $35,625 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetARKANSAS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCITY CONNECTIONS INC — $25,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Denison Texas — $22,500 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetMIA HAMM FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF PULASKI COUNTY — $15,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetREDSIDE FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetNATIONAL TAX LIMITATION FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

Walton Family Foundation IncAR37.5× affinity17 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Walton Family Foundation Inc · Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Alice L Walton Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Oklahoma Public School Resource Center · United Way of Grayson County Inc · W B Munson Foundation Xxxxx5008 · Elias & Hanna Regensburger Foundation · Nabholz Charitable Foundation · Texoma Community Foundation · Charter Fund Inc D/B/A Charter School Growth Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Town Branch Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • Oklahoma Public School Resource Center67% of income from government
  • Tulsa Community Foundation11% of income from government
  • Maryland Zoological Society Inc3% of income from government
  • Dove Schools Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Town Branch Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Town Branch Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph