Skip to content
Touro Infirmary at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Touro Infirmary

TOURO INFIRMARY is dedicated to improving the health status and well being of the people it serves through the provision of effective, efficient and compassionate healthcare services.

$2.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.4M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$56MHuman Services$83kArts & Culture$46kAnimals$27kFood & Nutrition$5k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,447,964
Median grant
1
States reached
$384M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW ORLEANS CLINICAL SERVICES LLC (A SMLLC OF LCMC)$1,447,964
LCMC HEALTH CLINICAL SERVICES DBA NOLA PHYSICIAN GROUP$500,758
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $83k) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BAYOU DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $60k → 23%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $23k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$56M · 8 repeat orgs$129k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
4

Total granted

$56M
$129k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+21%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UM
    UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
    3× · 2018–2022 · $44M · revenue +17%
  • LC
    LOUISIANA CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER
    4× · 2020–2023 · $3.8M · revenue +259%
  • AN
    Audubon Nature Institute Inc
    2× · 2022–2023 · $27k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • BD
    BAYOU DISTRICT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $60k · revenue -6%
  • FQ
    FRENCH QUARTER FESTIVALS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $31k · revenue +37%
  • NO
    NEW ORLEANS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $23k · revenue +21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Louisiana State University School of Med in New Orleans Faculty Group Practice

The patient-centered healthcare team of the lsu healthcare network will provide the highest quality, comprehensive medical care with compassion and professionalism, while maintaining our commitment to academic excellence

Health
2
Lsu Health Foundation New Orleans

The mission of the foundation is to inspire donors to invest in the lsu health sciences center - new orleans ("hsc-no") and its future, to properly steward those contributions, and to help meet the ever evolving needs of the lsuhsc-no by…

Health
3
Ochsner Health System

We serve, heal, lead, educate and innovate. ochsner will be a global medical and academic leader who will save and change lives. we will shape the future of healthcare through our integrated health system, fueled by the passion and…

—
4
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
5
Louisiana State Medical Society

The society's exempt purpose is to extend medical knowledge, advance medical science, elevate the standards of medical education and training, enforce just medical laws and regulations, promote dialogue and cooperation among physicians and…

—
6
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
7
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
8
Association of American Medical Colleges

Aamc leads & serves the academic medicine community to improve the health of people everywhere.

Education
9
Lafayette General Foundation Inc

The lafayette general foundation was created to support lafayette general health (lgh), acadiana's only community-owned, nonprofit health system. we exist to help fulfill lgh's mission, to restore, maintain, and improve health. our role is…

Health
10
Louisiana Alliance for Nonprofits

To strengthen, promote, and build the capacity of louisiana's nonprofit sector through education, advocacy, and member services.

Philanthropy
11
Touro Infirmary Foundation

The touro infirmary foundation has been established for the purpose of assisting touro infirmary to achieve its mission of continuing to provide quality healthcare and related services to the new orleans community.

Health
12
Ochsner Lsu Health System of North Louisiana

No board approved mission statement

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University Medical Center Management Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Audubon Nature Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION: $44,262,834 · HealthUNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER MANAGEMENT CORPORATIONLOUISIANA CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $3,791,132 · HealthLOUISIANA CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER+3 more: $57,500 · HealthNEW ORLEANS CLINICAL SERVICES LLC (A SMLLC OF LCMC): $4,928,100 · OtherNEW ORLEANS CLIN…LCMC Health Clinical Services dba NOLA Physician Group: $3,158,353 · OtherLCMC Health Clin…BAYOU DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $60,000 · Human ServicesNEW ORLEANS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $22,500 · Human ServicesFRENCH QUARTER FESTIVALS INC: $31,000 · Arts & CultureTHE LOUISIANA PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA: $15,000 · Arts & CultureAudubon Nature Institute Inc: $27,000 · Animals
Health$48,111,466Other$8,086,453Human Services$82,500Arts & Culture$46,000Animals$27,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION: $44,262,834 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetLOUISIANA CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $3,791,132 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBAYOU DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetFRENCH QUARTER FESTIVALS INC: $31,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAudubon Nature Institute Inc: $27,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ORLEANS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $22,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LOUISIANA PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater New Orlea…Children's Hospital I…Eugenie & Joseph Jone…New Orleans Community…Goldring Family Found…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Greater New Orleans FoundationLA17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater New Orleans Foundation · Children's Hospital Inc · Eugenie & Joseph Jones Family Foundation · New Orleans Community Support Foundation · Goldring Family Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Touro Infirmary funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Touro Infirmary. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Touro Infirmary’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home