Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Nextfifty Initiative

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$8.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
103
Grants FY2024still arriving
23
States reached
$600k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 42% of NEXTFIFTY INITIATIVE’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 103 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k20 grants · $81k
  • $10k–50k26 grants · $660k
  • $50k–250k53 grants · $5.6M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.7M
$54,175
Median grant
23
States reached
$264M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN SOCIETY ON AGING$600,000
ONE FAMILY FOUNDATION$500,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES$300,000
BROTHERS REDEVELOPMENT$260,000
SECOND CHANCE CENTER INC$228,900
ALMOST HOME INC$200,000
FOCUS POINTS FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER$200,000
USAGING$184,698
BOULDER FOOD RESCUE$180,000
GAY ELDERS OF METRO DETROIT DBA MIGEN$150,000
ITNAMERICA$150,000
HEALTHY AIR AND WATER COLORADO$150,000
DENVER INDIAN CENTER$150,000
COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS$150,000
LEADINGAGE$149,900
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $12.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LORI'S HANDS: $92k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDRENS SERVICE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $260k → 22%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $100k → 14%FRESNO ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES COMMISSION: $100k → 19%MEALS ON WHEELS COLLIN COUNTY: $75k → 5%HOPE HOSPICE AND COMMUNITY SERVICES: $75k → 11%HANNAN CENTER: $75k → 21%CREATIVE AGING NETWORK-NC: $75k → 16%SENIOR'S RESOURCE CENTER: $1.2M → 12%PENINSULA AGENCY ON AGING INC: $100k → 17%LA ALIANZA HISPANA INC: $100k → 16%INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER: $100k → 12%AMERICAN SOCIETY ON AGING: $600k → 10%HUDSON GUILD: $150k → 17%SENIOR'S RESOURCE CENTER: $1.2M → 12%PUEBLO COOPERATIVE CARE CENTER: $110k → 15%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE SEATTLE: $100k → 9%FSL PROGRAMS: $250k → 11%LA ALIANZA HISPANA INC: $100k → 16%CAPITOL HILL VILLAGE: $150k → 14%SENIOR'S RESOURCE CENTER: $120k → 12%OUTSTANDINGLIFE: $85k → 16%HARTLEY HOUSE: $100k → 17%CENTER FOR INDEPENDENCE: $130k → 11%HOMEWARD ALLIANCE: $150k → 11%SHALOM PARK: $100k → 8%SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER: $100k → 12%DENVER INDIAN CENTER: $150k → 12%DENVER INDIAN CENTER: $150k → 12%SSAI - CENTER FOR WORKFORCE INCLUSION: $150k → 8%LENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $150k → 17%COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS: $150k → 12%SOUTHWEST IMPROVEMENT COUNCIL: $100k → 12%PROJECT WORTHMORE: $149k → 8%PROJECT WORTHMORE: $100k → 8%ASIAN PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $98k → 8%SILVER KEY SENIOR SERVICES: $150k → 9%SILVER KEY SENIOR SERVICES: $100k → 9%SILVER KEY SENIOR SERVICES: $90k → 9%CENTER FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES: $125k → 12%FOCUS POINTS FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $200k → 12%SECOND CHANCE CENTER INC: $229k → 10%VIA MOBILITY SERVICES: $83k → 12%SECOND CHANCE CENTER: $150k → 10%SECOND CHANCE CENTER: $125k → 10%SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $100k → 9%A LITTLE HELP: $175k → 12%SENIOR SUPPORT SERVICES: $100k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NH
WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$31M · 183 repeat orgs$23M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

183 repeat relationships — 43 still active in FY2024, 140 since wound down; 59 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

183
339

Total granted

$31M
$19M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+22%

Still filing today

80%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OA
    Older Adults Technology Services
    2× · 2019–2021 · $1.2M · revenue +183%
  • CL
    CWI LABS INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $563k · revenue +352%
  • BR
    BROTHERS REDEVELOPMENT INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $562k · revenue +324%

Funded once

  • UA
    UCCS AGING CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $290k
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIAgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $260k · revenue +37%
  • FP
    FSL PROGRAMS
    one grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue -40%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Springs Independence Center

We work with people with disabilities, their families and the community to create independence so that all may thrive.

Human Services
2
Summit Community Care Clinic Inc

Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
3
Council of Preventive & Supportive Services for Aging Inc

To provide nutrition services for the benefit of elderly in southern colorado.

—
4
Leadingage Colorado

The mission of leadingage colorado is to foster a collaborative network that leads, advocates, and shares knowledge to promote a healthy business environment for members.

Community Improvement
5
Mesa County Rsvp Inc

Serving the community by utilizing the skills of senior volunteers and placing them in rewarding opportunities.

Philanthropy
6
Aia Colorado

AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…

—
7
Mental Health Center of Boulder County Inc

Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.

—
8
Healthier Colorado

Healthier colorado is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to raising the voices of coloradans in the public policy process to improve the health of our state's residents. we believe that every coloradan should have a fair…

Health
9
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
10
Senior Homes of Colorado Foundation Inc

Provide affordable and attractive independent living housing for seniors in a neighborhood setting that encourages fellowship and cooperative activities

Housing & Shelter
11
Hospice of Metro Denver Inc

To encircle those facing advanced illness with unprecedented levels of comfort, compassion, and expertise.

Human Services
12
Adult Care Management Inc

The mission of adult care management, inc. (acmi) is to enable the elderly, the chronically ill and persons with disabilities to maintain their lifestyle and dignity through care management. acmi provides functional evaluations of…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Colorado Visiting Nurse Association and the most unlike its peers is Lets Dance Activities. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsImmigrant Worker SupportSenior Support ServicesFood Banks and PantriesCancer Support ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…Developmental Disabilities …Local Food System Organizat…Faith-Based Social ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…Addiction Recovery ServicesOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Policy Research and AdvocacyLgbtq+ Community SupportYouth Mentoring ProgramsYouth Sports ProgramsEquine Therapy ProgramsAffordable Housing Construc…Local History MuseumsMilitary Veterans SupportCommunity FoundationsDance Arts OrganizationsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Public Library OperationsCommunity Arts CentersFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Domestic Violence ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Jewish Community Organizati…Environmental Conservation …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%2%<5yr15%11%5–10yr21%16%10–20yr17%26%20–35yr12%30%35–55yr13%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%1%<5yr15%7%5–10yr21%13%10–20yr17%25%20–35yr12%36%35–55yr13%18%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%6/424
the rest of the field
13%
4,361/32,993

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

397 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 397 of the 586 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

21
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
91
Early backer (in before they grew)
387/397
Grantees still filing
262/397
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE BELL POLICY CENTER — $661,646 · Other+98 more — $18,810,284 · Other+98 moreSENIORS' RESOURCE CENTER INC — $2,520,000 · Human ServicesSENIORS' RESOURCE CENTER IN…AMERICAN SOCIETY ON AGING — $600,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN SOCIETY ON AGINGSecond Chance Center Inc — $503,900 · Human ServicesA LITTLE HELP — $377,483 · Human ServicesSILVER KEY SENIOR SERVICES INC — $365,000 · Human Services+40 more — $5,956,999 · Human Services+40 moreOlder Adults Technology Services — $1,185,000 · EducationOlder Adu…ITNAMERICA — $550,000 · EducationITNAMERIC…UNIVERSITY OF DENVER — $306,893 · EducationUNIVERSIT…BENEFITS DATA TRUST — $250,000 · EducationBENEFITS …Trustees of Tufts College — $190,000 · EducationTrustees …DENVER PUBLIC LIBRARY FRIENDS FOUNDATION — $187,595 · EducationDENVER PU…Northwest Colorado Center for Independence Inc — $175,000 · EducationMOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY — $150,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION — $143,750 · EducationUNIVERSIDAD DEL SAGRADO CORAZON INC — $116,042 · Education+2 more — $185,000 · Education+2 moreCOLORADO RURAL HEALTH CENTER — $269,402 · HealthMAB COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $250,000 · HealthMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF MARYLAND INC — $250,000 · HealthVISITING ANCILLARY SERVICES INC — $235,000 · HealthCOLORADO HEALTH NETWORK INC — $211,085 · HealthDOMINICAN HOME HEALTH AGENCY INC — $194,088 · HealthBOULDER COUNTY AIDS PROJECT — $185,000 · HealthDENTAL LIFELINE NETWORK — $183,000 · HealthNORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION — $161,628 · HealthPARKINSON ASSOCIATION OF THE ROCKIES — $155,000 · HealthPROJECT ANGEL FOOD — $150,000 · HealthGRAND COUNTY RURAL HEALTH NETWORK INC — $150,000 · HealthVISITING NURSE SERVICES IN WESTCHESTER INC — $135,000 · HealthCOLORADO HEALTH INSTITUTE — $111,165 · Health+6 more — $586,390 · HealthBROTHERS REDEVELOPMENT INC — $562,000 · Housing & ShelterENERGY RESOURCE CENTER — $517,455 · Housing & ShelterHOMEWARD BOUND OF THE GRAND VALLEY — $302,965 · Housing & ShelterAlmost Home Inc — $200,000 · Housing & ShelterLA VETA VILLAGE INC — $185,000 · Housing & ShelterFUEL FUND OF MARYLAND INC — $150,000 · Housing & ShelterPOSADA — $150,000 · Housing & ShelterLEADINGAGE INC — $149,900 · Housing & ShelterSouthwest Center for Independence Inc — $120,000 · Housing & ShelterSUNSHINE HOME SHARE COLORADO — $91,114 · Housing & ShelterDOORS 2 SUCCESS — $91,000 · Housing & ShelterNATIONAL CIVIC LEAGUE — $390,059 · Community ImprovementCenter for African American Health — $345,000 · Community ImprovementMISSION ST LOUIS — $338,117 · Community ImprovementTHE COLORADO NONPROFIT DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $329,863 · Community ImprovementSAFE AND HEALTHY COMMUNITIES — $177,800 · Community ImprovementPROJECT ANGEL HEART — $173,175 · Community ImprovementTHE LADIES OF HOPE MINISTRIES INC — $140,000 · Community ImprovementTOWN OF BRISTOL IMPROVEMENTS BOARD — $100,000 · Community ImprovementRose Community Foundation — $425,000 · PhilanthropyLICENSED DENTAL HYGIENE CARE — $200,000 · PhilanthropyLAMAR COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $158,000 · PhilanthropyPARTNERS IN CARE MARYLAND INC — $150,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION SERVING SOUTHWEST COLORADO — $98,614 · Philanthropy
Other$19,471,930Human Services$10,323,382Education$3,439,280Health$3,226,758Housing & Shelter$2,519,434Community Improvement$1,994,014Philanthropy$1,031,614

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSENIORS' RESOURCE CENTER INC — $2,520,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetOlder Adults Technology Services — $1,185,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetTHE BELL POLICY CENTER — $661,646 over 5y, 14% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY ON AGING — $600,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetColorado Latino Leadership Advocacy & Research Organization — $595,000 over 3y, 23% of budgetBROTHERS REDEVELOPMENT INC — $562,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetITNAMERICA — $550,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetCOLORADO CROSS DISABILITY COALITION — $550,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetCOLORADO GERONTOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $535,530 over 5y, 12% of budgetENERGY RESOURCE CENTER — $517,455 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetSecond Chance Center Inc — $503,900 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetRose Community Foundation — $425,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCOLORADO CONSUMER HEALTH INITIATIVE — $400,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetNATIONAL CIVIC LEAGUE — $390,059 over 2y, 24% of budgetA LITTLE HELP — $377,483 over 4y, 17% of budgetSILVER KEY SENIOR SERVICES INC — $365,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetVive — $350,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetCenter for African American Health — $345,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetMISSION ST LOUIS — $338,117 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetTHE COLORADO NONPROFIT DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $329,863 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetHOMEWARD ALLIANCE INC — $325,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetPROJECT WORTHMORE — $313,427 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetDENVER INDIAN CENTER INC — $309,495 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER — $306,893 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEWARD BOUND OF THE GRAND VALLEY — $302,965 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetMOUNT EVANS HOSPICE INC DBA MOUNT EVANS HOME HEALTH CARE AND HOS — $300,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetTHE SENIOR HUB INC — $293,900 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES — $288,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetCOLORADO RURAL HEALTH CENTER — $269,402 over 2y, 8.9% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $260,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetBOULDER FOOD RESCUE — $252,875 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetFSL PROGRAMS — $250,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES — $250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBENEFITS DATA TRUST — $250,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMAB COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $250,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF MARYLAND INC — $250,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetSPRING INSTITUTE FOR INTERCULTURAL LEARNING — $238,693 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetVISITING ANCILLARY SERVICES INC — $235,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetINTERFAITH WORKS OF CENTRAL NEW YORK — $219,611 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetEASTER SEALS OF OREGON — $214,880 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCOLORADO HEALTH NETWORK INC — $211,085 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAlmost Home Inc — $200,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetLA ALIANZA HISPANA INC — $200,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetFOCUS POINTS FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER — $200,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetLICENSED DENTAL HYGIENE CARE — $200,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetJUSTICE AND MERCY LEGAL AID CENTER — $200,000 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetBAYAUD ENTERPRISES INC — $196,225 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetDOMINICAN HOME HEALTH AGENCY INC — $194,088 over 3y, 7.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Anschutz Family Found…The Colorado Health F…El Pomar FoundationColorado Gives Founda…Caring for Colorado F…Rose Community Founda…Rocky Mountain Health…The Colorado TrustThe Denver FoundationDaniels FundTrailhead InstituteCaring for Colorado C…
Anschutz Family FoundationCO136.4× affinity92 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Anschutz Family Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Caring for Colorado Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · The Colorado Trust · The Denver Foundation · Daniels Fund · Trailhead Institute · Caring for Colorado Centennial Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Nextfifty Initiative funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 41%
  • Cwi Works Inc — 100% of income from government
  • Easter Seals of Oregon — 77% of income from government
  • Mab Community Services Inc — 69% of income from government
  • La Alianza Hispana Inc — 41% of income from government
  • Partners in Care Maryland Inc — 40% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
  • Lori's Hands Inc — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
98report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Nextfifty Initiative?

Find your warmest path to Nextfifty Initiative through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 586 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines