Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tony and Mary Ann Pasquinelli Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$247k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$359kHealth$314kHuman Services$130kReligion$86kArts & Culture$83kAnimals$50kInternational$30kRecreation & Sports$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $200k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$906k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OSF HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$30,000
WELLNESS HOUSE$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$15,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CHICAGO$10,000
NATL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL HEALTH$10,000
ROOSEVELT UNIVERSITY$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
LYONS TOWNSHIP HOCKEY CLUB$10,000
MUMMZY CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND$10,000
GIRLS INC$10,000
ST COLETTA'S OF IL$10,000
JESUIT COLLEGE PREP$10,000
AUDITORIUM THEATRE$10,000
GLENWOOD ACADEMY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CENTER ON HALSTED: $2k → 14%CENTER ON HALSTED: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
IA
IN
PA
CT
VA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 34 repeat orgs$223k to everyone else

34 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
24

Total granted

$1.1M
$198k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+22%

Still filing today

38%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsEducationInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OH
    OSF Healthcare Foundation
    2× · 2024–2025 · $50k · revenue +7%
  • WH
    Wellness House
    2× · 2024–2025 · $30k · revenue +9%
  • RN
    RESPOND NOW
    6× · 2020–2025 · $29k · revenue +244%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $37k
  • RB
    RADIANCE BALL WELLNESS HOUSE
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • EA
    ELMHURST ART MUSEUM
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue -50%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Health Law Association

The mission of the american health law association is to deliver authoritative educational content and serve as a professional home for all who engage with health law.

—
2
Illinois Health and Hospital Association

To advocate for and support hospitals and health systems as they serve patients and communities in illinois.

—
3
Joliet Area Community Hospice Corp

The mission of the lightways hospice and serious illness care is to provide comprehensive, holistic, community based support services and care for terminally ill persons, their caregivers and loved ones without regard to economic status,…

Human Services
4
Elmhurst Memorial Healthcare Group

The elmhurst memorial healthcare group follows the mission of endeavor health (f/k/a ns-ee holdings). the mission of endeavor health is to "help everyone in our communities be their best." central to this mission is a commitment to…

—
5
Hebrew Health Care Inc

The mission of hebrew health care is to provide highly personalized quality programs and services to the seniors of our community. we assure dignified, informed, quality care to all regardless of source of payment for services. (see…

Health
6
Wisconsin Lutheran Home Ministries Inc

To share christ's love as we serve the spiritual, physical, intellectual and emotional needs of people entrusted to our care and others whose lives we touch.

—
7
Ehs Home Health Care Service Inc

Ehs home health care service, inc.'s (ehshhc) mission is to provide quality medical home health services and education to various communities in the chicagoland area regardless of race, creed, sex, national origin, handicap, age or ability…

Health
8
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
9
Mchc Chicago Hospital Council

The mission of mchc chicago hospital council is to foster, promote, support, develop and encourage charitable, educational, scholastic and scientific purposes; promote cooperative effort and action between hospitals and other health care…

Health
10
Riverview Healthcare Association

We deliver a healthcare experience that consistently exceeds patients' expectations through exceptional people - our people are our foundation. we employ trusted, dedicated professionals who serve with compassion, empathy and respect.…

Health
11
Christian Care Retirement Apartments Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve

—
12
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girls Inc; the most unlike its peers is Culinary Care. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
12/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Roosevelt University: $100,000 · OtherRoosevelt UniversityIndividual grant recipient: $90,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST COLETTA'S OF IL: $85,000 · OtherST COLETTA'S OF ILJESUIT COLLEGE PREP: $65,000 · OtherJESUIT COLLEGE PREPIJP SCHOOL TREK FOR TECHNOLOGY: $51,500 · OtherIJP SCHOOL TREK FOR TECHNOLOGYMUMMZY CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $47,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION OF ILLINOIS: $47,000 · OtherAUDITORIUM THEATER: $43,025 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $37,000 · OtherALS ASSOCIATION OF GREATER CHICAGO: $32,350 · Other+40 more: $343,200 · Other+40 moreOSF Healthcare Foundation: $50,000 · HealthOSF Health…Wellness House: $30,000 · HealthWellness H…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $25,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'…JOURNEY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $5,000 · HealthAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $5,000 · HealthGLENWOOD ACADEMY: $75,000 · EducationLYONS TOWNSHIP HOCKEY CLUB: $25,000 · EducationANIMAL CARE LEAGUE: $25,000 · AnimalsCATNAP FROM THE HEART: $21,000 · AnimalsRESPOND NOW: $29,000 · Human ServicesCenter on Halsted: $4,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,500 · Human ServicesCOMMON HOPE: $30,000 · InternationalELMHURST ART MUSEUM: $15,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$941,075Health$115,000Education$100,000Animals$46,000Human Services$35,500International$30,000Arts & Culture$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRoosevelt University: $100,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGLENWOOD ACADEMY: $75,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetOSF Healthcare Foundation: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWellness House: $30,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMON HOPE: $30,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetRESPOND NOW: $29,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetLYONS TOWNSHIP HOCKEY CLUB: $25,000 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL CARE LEAGUE: $25,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCATNAP FROM THE HEART: $21,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetELMHURST ART MUSEUM: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGIRLS INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDUNELAND BEACH ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetJOURNEY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAFFORDABLE RECOVERY HOUSING: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCulinary Care: $5,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNICOLET HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCenter on Halsted: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Roosevelt University ↗
  • Who funds GLENWOOD ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds OSF Healthcare Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Wellness House ↗
  • Who funds COMMON HOPE ↗
  • Who funds RESPOND NOW ↗
  • Who funds LYONS TOWNSHIP HOCKEY CLUB ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL CARE LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds CATNAP FROM THE HEART ↗
  • Who funds ELMHURST ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INC ↗
  • Who funds DUNELAND BEACH ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL14.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Baird Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tony and Mary Ann Pasquinelli Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tony and Mary Ann Pasquinelli Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tony and Mary Ann Pasquinelli Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Tony and Mary Ann Pasquinelli Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tony and Mary Ann Pasquinelli’s filings →

    More from the funding graph