Skip to content
Tom & Nancy Juda Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Tom & Nancy Juda Foundation

$34k
Granted FY2022
9
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Health$78kReligion$68kPhilanthropy$33kArts & Culture$27kYouth Development$20kEducation$12kInternational$7kHuman Services$5kOther$0
02FY2022 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k8 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,068
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION$10,000
CEDARS-SINAI HOSPITAL$9,000
WILSHIRE BLVD TEMPLE$7,150
FLARE EDUCATION$5,000
PLAN INTERNATIONAL USA$1,068
KARSCH FAMILY SOCIAL SERVICES CENTE$1,000
MVAT FOUNDATION$500
CARING SHARING OF SOUTH BAY$500
Individual grant recipient$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $1k → 14%KARSCH FAMILY SOCIAL SERVICES CENTE: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%CARING SHARING OF SOUTH BAY: $500 → 14%CARING SHARING OF SOUTH BAY: $500 → 14%CARING SHARING OF SOUTH BAY: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$178k · 13 repeat orgs$78k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2022, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
13

Total granted

$178k
$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+50%

Still filing today

62%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesEducationInternationalArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MUSEUM ASSOCIATES
    3× · 2017–2019 · $6k · revenue +89%
  • NR
    NEW ROADS SCHOOL
    2× · 2017–2018 · $4k · revenue +29%
  • PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $750 · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • PA
    PATSY AND ARNOLD PALMER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $33k · revenue -10% · 100% of their budget
  • HM
    HOLOCAUST MUSEUM LAgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +464%
  • LA
    LOS ANGELES FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
2
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
3
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
4
All About Kids La
Philanthropy
5
Armand Hammer Museum of Art and Cultural Center Inc

The hammer museum at ucla believes in the promise of art and ideas to illuminate our lives and build a more just world.

Arts & Culture
6
Los Angeles World Affairs Council and Town Hall

The organization is a non-partisan, membership based speakers' forum that connects business leaders, community members, and engaged individuals with shared interest in local, national, and global affairs. it provides an open and accessible…

International
7
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
8
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
9
Girl Scouts of Greater Los Angeles

Girl scouts' mission is to build girls of courage, confidence, and character, who make the world a better place. girl scouts of greater los angeles ("gsgla the "council "girl scouts"), the largest girl-serving nonprofit in southern…

Youth Development
10
San Jose Museum of Art Association

Nurture empathy and connection by engaging communities with socially relevant contemporary art

Arts & Culture
11
Hollywood Schoolhouse Inc

Hollywood Schoolhouse knows, values, and encourages fearless curiosity. Through a blended program of innovative academics and structured learning, our diverse community inspires students to be academically strong, artistically proud,…

Education
12
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys and Girls Club of Hollywood Inc; the most unlike its peers is Patsy and Arnold Palmer Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WILSHIRE BOULEVARD TEMPLE: $68,490 · OtherWILSHIRE BOULEVARD TEMPLECEDARS-SINAI HOSPITAL: $65,000 · OtherCEDARS-SINAI HOSPITALPATSY AND ARNOLD PALMER FOUNDATION: $33,180 · OtherPATSY AND ARNOLD PALMER FOUNDATION+12 more: $15,736 · Other+12 moreHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA: $20,000 · Arts & CultureHOLOCAUST M…MUSEUM ASSOCIATES: $5,710 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM ASSO…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HOLLYWOOD INC: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentFLARE EDUCATION INC: $5,000 · EducationNEW ROADS SCHOOL: $3,500 · EducationTHE CENTER FOR EARLY EDUCATION: $3,000 · EducationTOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthCARING AND SHARING OF SOUTH BAY: $1,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 · Human ServicesKARSH FAMILY SOCIAL SERVICE CENTER INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesUNION RESCUE MISSION: $1,000 · Human ServicesPLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $2,100 · InternationalYONSEI BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION: $100 · International+1 more: $75 · International
Other$182,406Arts & Culture$25,710Youth Development$20,000Education$11,500Health$10,000Human Services$4,500International$2,275

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPATSY AND ARNOLD PALMER FOUNDATION: $33,180 over 1y, 100% of budgetHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HOLLYWOOD INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFLARE EDUCATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNEW ROADS SCHOOL: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR EARLY EDUCATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $2,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEROES LINKED: $1,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKARSH FAMILY SOCIAL SERVICE CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYONSEI BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ahmanson Foundati…Jewish Community Foun…California Community …Morgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Ahmanson FoundationCA13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ahmanson Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · California Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tom & Nancy Juda Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tom & Nancy Juda Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Tom & Nancy Juda Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Tom & Nancy Juda Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tom & Nancy Juda’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home