Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tom & Helen Tonkin Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$127k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$857kPhilanthropy$179kEducation$82kArts & Culture$62kYouth Development$61kHousing & Shelter$18kRecreation & Sports$15kFood & Nutrition$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $112k
$14,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WYOMING INDEPENDENT LIVING$39,900
UNACCOMPANIED STUDENTS INITIATIVE$18,000
OXBOW CENTER$15,000
SUE JORGENSEN LIBRARY FOUNDATION$15,000
JOURNEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$14,000
YMCA OF NATRONA COUNTY$10,000
NATRONA COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION$5,000
JASONS FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC$5,000
KELLY WALSH LAST BLAST$4,000
MOUNTAIN ROAD CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $438k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WYOMING INDEPENDENT LIVING INCORPORATED: $155k → 11%WYOMING INDEPENDENT LIVING INCORPORATED: $143k → 11%WYOMING INDEPENDENT LIVING INCORPORATED: $50k → 11%WYOMING INDEPENDENT LIVING: $40k → 11%Jason's Friends Foundation Inc: $10k → 11%JASON'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 11%Joshuas Storehouse and Distribution: $8k → 11%JASONS FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 11%CASA of Natrona County: $5k → 11%Jason's Friends Foundation Inc: $5k → 11%JASONS FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 11%Jason's Friends Foundation Inc: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 17% of Tom & Helen Tonkin Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Tom & Helen Tonkin Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 27% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$999k · 13 repeat orgs$113k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +82% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
9

Total granted

$999k
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+82%
+4%

Still filing today

62%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $57k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentReligionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WI
    Wyoming Independent Living Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $760k · revenue +101%
  • CF
    Casper Family YMCA INC
    3× · 2018–2025 · $40k · revenue +86%
  • JF
    JASON'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $38k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • 3D
    307 DANCE ACADEMYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $12k · revenue +67%
  • JS
    Joshuas Storehouse and Distribution Center
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue -69%
  • NA
    NICOLAYSEN ART MUSEUMgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +28%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boys & Girls Club of Central Wyoming Endowment Foundation Inc

To support the Boys & Girls Club of Central Wyoming through a Building Fund, Endowment Fund, and Educational Fund

Youth Development
2
Youth Crisis Center

Crisis mission: to provide temporary care and shelter for abused, abandoned or neglected children long term mission: to provide a residency program for children without a stable home.

Housing & Shelter
3
Wyoming Cares Inc

None

Human Services
4
Wyoming County Special Needs Association
Human Services
5
Worland Youth Learning Center

Provide programs and services to promote and enchance the development of boys and girls

Youth Development
6
Serve Wyoming Inc

The strengthen Wyoming communities by fostering a spirit of service and volunteerism among citizens of all ages and carry out a national service program as authorized by the National and Community Service Act of 1990.

Philanthropy
7
Wyoming Symphony Orchestra Inc

To enrich the cultural lives of adults, expand the musical horizons of children and provide an outlet for the creative talents of musicians living in Wyoming and the Rocky Mountain region by performing classical and popular music to an…

—
8
Youth Clubs of Park County Inc

Boys and girls club of park county, wyoming, inc. is a non-profit organization incorporated in the state of wyoming to administer programs that benefit children in the park county area. to inspire and enable all young people, especially…

Youth Development
9
Wyoming Assn of Non Profit Organizations dba Wyoming Nonprofit Network

The Wyoming Nonprofit Network represents the collective voice of the Wyoming charitable nonprofit sector and brings best practices, resources, and support to the nonprofit community.

Philanthropy
10
Douglas Youth Hockey Association

To promote the sport of hockey in the douglas, wyoming area.

Recreation & Sports
11
Wyo Theatre Inc

Inspire, educate and entertain citizens of all ages by giving the performing arts a place to be seen, heard and felt.

Arts & Culture
12
Wyoming Citizen Review Panel

WYCRP is committed to supporting the safety, permanence, and well-being of children through systematic reviews, education, prevention, and early intervention efforts. As a federally mandated entity, the Citizen Review Panel evaluates the…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Volunteers of America Northern Rockies; the most unlike its peers is The Science Zone. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Wyoming Independent Living Inc: $759,992 · Human ServicesWyoming Independent Living IncJASON'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC: $37,500 · Human Services+2 more: $12,800 · Human ServicesCasper Family YMCA INC: $39,700 · OtherCasper Family Y…MOUNT HOPE LUTHERAN CHURCH: $24,300 · OtherMOUNT HOPE LUTH…St Anthony Tri-Parish School: $21,050 · OtherSt Anthony Tri-…OXBOW CENTER: $15,000 · OtherOXBOW CENTERJOURNEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $14,000 · OtherJOURNEY ELEMENT…Our Camp Inc: $9,525 · OtherKelly Walsh High School: $9,500 · OtherNATRONA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $8,000 · Other+9 more: $40,150 · Other+9 moreWYOMING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $178,655 · PhilanthropyWYOMING COMMUNI…THE SCIENCE ZONE: $30,250 · Arts & Culture307 DANCE ACADEMY: $11,750 · Arts & CultureNICOLAYSEN ART MUSEUM: $6,160 · Arts & CultureTHE SHACK: $30,000 · ReligionBoys & Girls Club of Central Wyoming: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentBoys & Girls Club of Douglas: $4,550 · Youth DevelopmentUNACCOMPANIED STUDENTS INITIATIVE: $18,000 · Housing & Shelter
Human Services$810,292Other$181,225Philanthropy$178,655Arts & Culture$48,160Religion$30,000Youth Development$24,550Housing & Shelter$18,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWyoming Independent Living Inc: $759,992 over 9y, 5.7% of budgetWYOMING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $178,655 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetCasper Family YMCA INC: $39,700 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetJASON'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC: $37,500 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetTHE SCIENCE ZONE: $30,250 over 2y, 13% of budgetTHE SHACK: $30,000 over 6y, 6.5% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Central Wyoming: $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budget307 DANCE ACADEMY: $11,750 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetJoshuas Storehouse and Distribution Center: $7,800 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetNICOLAYSEN ART MUSEUM: $6,160 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSpecial Olympics Wyoming Inc: $5,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCASA of Natrona County: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNatrona County Public Library Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA NORTHERN ROCKIES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Douglas: $4,550 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Wyoming Independent Living Inc ↗
  • Who funds WYOMING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Casper Family YMCA INC ↗
  • Who funds JASON'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SCIENCE ZONE ↗
  • Who funds THE SHACK ↗
  • Who funds Boys & Girls Club of Central Wyoming ↗
  • Who funds UNACCOMPANIED STUDENTS INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds 307 DANCE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds Our Camp Inc ↗
  • Who funds Joshuas Storehouse and Distribution Center ↗
  • Who funds NICOLAYSEN ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds CASPER CHILDREN'S CHORALE INC ↗
  • Who funds Special Olympics Wyoming Inc ↗
  • Who funds CASA of Natrona County ↗
  • Who funds Natrona County Public Library Foundation ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA NORTHERN ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds Boys & Girls Club of Douglas ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wyoming Community FoundationWY34.1× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wyoming Community Foundation · The McMurry Foundation · Natrona Collective Health Trust · Zimmerman Family Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Double 4 Foundation · Wold Foundation · The John P Ellbogen Foundation · Gertrude Kamps Memorial Foundation · The Joseph J Scott Foundation · Tw Foundation · Tate Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tom & Helen Tonkin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tom & Helen Tonkin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tom & Helen Tonkin’s filings →

    More from the funding graph