· Private foundation
Tom Adjutant and Ariel Steele Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k15 grants · $11k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $21k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DENVER ZOO | $10,500 |
| NATEGEMEA FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| COLORADOGIVESORG | $1,560 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,040 |
| KIDSPAK | $1,030 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,010 |
| INTL DOCUMENTARY ASSN (IDA) | $1,000 |
| NEVADA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY | $250 |
| SEE INTERNATIONAL | $107 |
| 39TH ANNUAL WHEELS | $103 |
| AMERICAN EAGLE FOUNDATION | $100 |
| REALTOR ASSOCIATION | $100 |
| COLORDAUS | $35 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
US giving: 81% of grant dollars ($51k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 19% that went abroad ($12k) is mapped below.
Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $89) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
Beyond the US: 19% of all-years giving ($12k)
3 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
How this is measured
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
At Environmental and Animal Defense, our mission is to provide Colorado with access to affordable legal services for environmental and animal issues, in addition to protecting wildlife and their habitats through enforcement of the law. No…
Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…
Utah's hogle zoo creates champions for wildlife and is our community's gateway to animals, connecting our visitors with the natural world and engaging them in wildlife conservation action locally and worldwide.
To offer compassionate care to animals, support safe communities, and provide socially conscious sheltering. (continued on schedule o)
To provide exceptional lifelong, social, emotional, and cognitive care to rescued farmed animals and advocate for animals who have not been rescued by sharing our residents' stories to inspire, educate, and empower others to embrace a more…
Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…
To provide urban residents the opportunity to participate in agriculture by removing the barriers to entry such as land access, time, location and finances; and inspire excitement through practical experience while fostering respect,…
Our mission is to act to conserve threatened species and ecosystems worldwide, choosing solutions that are sustainable, based on sound science and take into account human needs.
How this is measured
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SMALL CHAMPIONS INC ↗
- Who funds KIDSPAK INC ↗
- Who funds MISSION ANIMAL HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds ABRAHAMIC REUNION INC ↗
- Who funds THE TONY ROBBINS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SURGICAL EYE EXPEDITIONS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN EAGLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SERVE 6 8 ↗
- Who funds IMMANUEL FOUNDATION ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Tom Adjutant and Ariel Steele Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tom Adjutant and Ariel Steele Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Tom Adjutant and Ariel Steele’s filings →