Skip to content
Together Making Changes Corporation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Together Making Changes Corporation

To support meaningful causes and strengthen the communities we serve.

$273k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$158k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Health$398kHuman Services$186kPublic Safety & Disaster$42kPhilanthropy$34kReligion$8k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $243,235, the rows itemized in this filing. The $272,795 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $29,560 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$158,403
Median grant
1
States reached
$150k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$158,403
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$84,832
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $104k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS OF SOUTHEAST & D: $21k → 14%THE WOMEN'S CARE CENTER - CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER: $10k → 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $44k → 14%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NORTHWEST FLORIDA: $8k → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS GREATER HOUSTON: $21k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
UT
MO
OK
LA
MS
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$579k · 3 repeat orgs$307k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
27

Total granted

$579k
$307k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+58%

Still filing today

100%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    3× · 2019–2025 · $282k · revenue +17%
  • RM
    Ronald McDonald House Global
    3× · 2018–2025 · $201k · revenue +82%
  • CM
    CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK
    2× · 2017–2018 · $97k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $44k · revenue +90%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    one grant, 2018 · $42k · revenue +9%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA
    one grant, 2017 · $17k · revenue -6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Methodist Healthcare-Memphis Hospitals

Methodist le bonheur healthcare, in partnership with its medical staffs, will collaborate with patients and their families to be the leader in providing high quality, cost-effective patient-and family-centered care. services will be…

Health
2
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
3
The Methodist Hospital

To provide high quality, cost-effective health care that delivers the best value to the people we serve in a spiritual environment of caring in association with internationally recognized teaching and research.

Health
4
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
5
St Vincent Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Franci s

To continue christ's healing love through delivery of competent & compassionate healthcare in an environment sensitive to the needs of all people. the hospital is committed to providing a broad range of quality inpatient and outpatient…

Health
6
Washington Regional Medical Center

Washington regional is committed to improving the health of people in communities we serve through compassionate, high-quality care, prevention, and wellness education.

Health
7
Orlando Health Inc

Orlando health is a trusted leader inspiring hope through the advancement of health. our mission as a community-owned organization is to improve the health and quality of life of the individuals and communities we serve.

Health
8
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
9
Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation

Johns hopkins health system corporation provides centralized management of a multi-hospital healthcare system. it is a key component of johns hopkins medicine, a collaboration with the johns hopkins university school of medicine.

Health
10
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
11
Methodist Medical Center

Methodist Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
12
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Our Lady of the Lake Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Syringomyelia Alliance Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
24/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $282,140 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INCRonald McDonald House Global: $200,733 · HealthRonald McDonald House Global+16 more: $133,881 · Health+16 moreCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK: $96,619 · OtherCHILDREN'S MIRACLE …AMERICAN SYRINGOMYELIA ALLIANCE PROJECT INC: $10,152 · OtherAMERICAN SYRINGOMYE…JOHN SEALY HOSPITALUTMB: $10,152 · OtherJOHN SEALY HOSPITAL…PILOTS FOR CHRIST INC: $7,875 · OtherUTMD ANDERSON: $7,846 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $7,846 · OtherMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION OKLAHOMA CITY: $7,846 · OtherVIA LINK INC: $7,590 · OtherWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $44,283 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARR…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $42,314 · Human ServicesAmerican Nat…Christian Care Center Inc: $10,152 · Human ServicesChristian Ca…RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF NORTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $7,590 · Human ServicesRONALD MCDON…UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA: $17,032 · PhilanthropyBATON ROUGE AREA FOUNDATION: $17,032 · Philanthropy
Health$616,754Other$155,926Human Services$104,339Philanthropy$34,064

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $282,140 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRonald McDonald House Global: $200,733 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK: $96,619 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $44,283 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $42,314 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA: $17,032 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMemorial Hermann Foundation: $10,152 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChristian Care Center Inc: $10,152 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN SYRINGOMYELIA ALLIANCE PROJECT INC: $10,152 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL: $10,152 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital: $10,152 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL & NORTHERN FLORIDA: $10,152 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL INC: $7,875 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMARY BIRD PERKINS CANCER CENTER: $7,875 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $7,875 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $7,875 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPILOTS FOR CHRIST INC: $7,875 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMID-AMERICA TRANSPLANT SERVICES: $7,846 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILES PERRET CANCER SERVICES: $7,846 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION OKLAHOMA CITY: $7,846 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOur Lady of the Lake Hospital Inc: $7,846 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW MILESTONES FOUNDATION INC DBA INTEGRAL CARE FOUNDATION: $7,590 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetHOSPICE OF MARSHALL COUNTY FOUNDATION INC: $7,590 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CRISIS CENTER OF TAMPA BAY INC: $7,590 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF NORTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $7,590 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFORREST GENERAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $7,590 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetVIA LINK INC: $7,590 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Enterprise Holdings F…American Cancer Socie…Greater Houston Commu…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Shell USA Company Fou…Raymond James Charita…Morgan Stanley Global…The Blackbaud Giving …Charities Aid Foundat…Network for GoodAmerican Online Givin…
Enterprise Holdings FoundationMO13.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Enterprise Holdings Foundation · American Cancer Society Inc · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Together Making Changes Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Together Making Changes Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Crisis Center of Tampa Bay Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Together Making Changes Corporation?

Find your warmest path to Together Making Changes Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Together Making Changes’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home