Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Together Making Changes Corporation

TOGETHER MAKING CHANGES CORPORATION's purpose is to provide support and assistance to initiatives and special interests of therapy management team members, our residents and patients that we serve.

$90k
Granted FY2020
1
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172020.

Health$398kHuman Services$186kPublic Safety & Disaster$42kPhilanthropy$34kReligion$8k
02FY2020 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $45,081 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $90,163 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $45,082 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$45,081
Median grant
1
States reached
$124k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$45,081
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $104k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS OF SOUTHEAST & D: $21k → 14%THE WOMEN'S CARE CENTER - CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER: $10k → 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $44k → 14%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NORTHWEST FLORIDA: $8k → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS GREATER HOUSTON: $21k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
UT
MO
OK
LA
MS
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$336k · 3 repeat orgs$307k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2020, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
27

Total granted

$336k
$307k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+48%

Still filing today

100%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $124k · revenue +17%
  • RM
    Ronald McDonald House Global
    2× · 2018–2019 · $116k · revenue +82%
  • CM
    CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK
    2× · 2017–2018 · $97k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $44k · revenue +70%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    one grant, 2018 · $42k · revenue +9%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA
    one grant, 2017 · $17k · revenue -6%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memorial Hermann Medical Group

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
2
Mhs Physicians of Texas

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
3
Mercy Hospital and Medical Center

We, mercy health system of chicago and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.mhmc is a member of mercy health system of chicago and trinity…

Health
4
Mercy Medical Center

Like the Sisters of Mercy before us, we witness God's healing love for all people by providing excellent clinical services within a community of compassionate care. As an independent Catholic hospital, we pledge to enhance the health of…

Health
5
Methodist Medical Center

Methodist Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
6
Holy Cross Hospital Inc

We, holy cross hospital and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. holy cross hospital is a member of trinity health.

Health
7
Medical Center of Central Georgia Inc

To enhance the health status of those we serve in partnership with medical staff and other community organizations by providing wellness services, health education, training, and access to safe high quality health care services.

Health
8
Franciscan Missionaries of Our Lady Health System Inc

Inspired by the vision of st. francis and in the tradition of the roman catholic church, we extend the healing ministry of jesus christ to god's people, especially those most in need. we call forth all who serve in this healthcare…

Health
9
St Martin Hospital Inc

To improve, maintain and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
10
The Methodist Hospital

To provide high quality, cost-effective health care that delivers the best value to the people we serve in a spiritual environment of caring in association with internationally recognized teaching and research.

Health
11
Methodist Healthcare-Memphis Hospitals

Methodist le bonheur healthcare, in partnership with its medical staffs, will collaborate with patients and their families to be the leader in providing high quality, cost-effective patient-and family-centered care. services will be…

Health
12
Ochsner Health System

We serve, heal, lead, educate and innovate. ochsner will be a global medical and academic leader who will save and change lives. we will shape the future of healthcare through our integrated health system, fueled by the passion and…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Our Lady of the Lake Hospital Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Syringomyelia Alliance Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support OrganizationsHospice Care ServicesSubstance Abuse TreatmentCommunity Health CentersUnited Way FederationsVeteran Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 49 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr13%39%35–55yr16%39%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%1%10–20yr16%13%20–35yr13%64%35–55yr16%22%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,533

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
24/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $123,737 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INCRonald McDonald House Global — $115,901 · HealthRonald McDonald House Global+16 more — $133,881 · Health+16 moreCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK — $96,619 · OtherCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORKAMERICAN SYRINGOMYELIA ALLIANCE PROJECT INC — $10,152 · OtherAMERICAN SYRINGOMYELIA ALL…JOHN SEALY HOSPITALUTMB — $10,152 · OtherJOHN SEALY HOSPITALUTMBPILOTS FOR CHRIST INC — $7,875 · OtherUTMD ANDERSON — $7,846 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $7,846 · OtherMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION OKLAHOMA CITY — $7,846 · OtherVIA LINK INC — $7,590 · OtherWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $44,283 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR P…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $42,314 · Human ServicesAmerican National…Christian Care Center Inc — $10,152 · Human ServicesChristian Care Ce…RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF NORTHWEST FLORIDA INC — $7,590 · Human ServicesRONALD MCDONALD H…UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA — $17,032 · PhilanthropyBATON ROUGE AREA FOUNDATION — $17,032 · Philanthropy
Health$373,519Other$155,926Human Services$104,339Philanthropy$34,064

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $123,737 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK — $96,619 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $44,283 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $42,314 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA — $17,032 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN SYRINGOMYELIA ALLIANCE PROJECT INC — $10,152 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL & NORTHERN FLORIDA — $10,152 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL — $10,152 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital — $10,152 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMemorial Hermann Foundation — $10,152 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChristian Care Center Inc — $10,152 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL INC — $7,875 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $7,875 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $7,875 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPILOTS FOR CHRIST INC — $7,875 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMARY BIRD PERKINS CANCER CENTER — $7,875 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILES PERRET CANCER SERVICES — $7,846 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION OKLAHOMA CITY — $7,846 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMID-AMERICA TRANSPLANT SERVICES — $7,846 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOur Lady of the Lake Hospital Inc — $7,846 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CRISIS CENTER OF TAMPA BAY INC — $7,590 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF NORTHWEST FLORIDA INC — $7,590 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHOSPICE OF MARSHALL COUNTY FOUNDATION INC — $7,590 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNEW MILESTONES FOUNDATION INC DBA INTEGRAL CARE FOUNDATION — $7,590 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetVIA LINK INC — $7,590 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFORREST GENERAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC — $7,590 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Enterprise Holdings FoundationMO13.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Enterprise Holdings Foundation · American Cancer Society Inc · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Together Making Changes Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 6%
  • The Crisis Center of Tampa Bay Inc6% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Together Making Changes Corporation?

Find your warmest path to Together Making Changes Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $138k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2020, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph