Skip to content

· Private foundation

Todd Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$108k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$250kAnimals$140kEnvironment$43kEducation$24kHuman Services$16k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $62k
$8,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PINES OF PEACE$22,120
LINDSAY WILDLIFE EXPERIENCE$10,000
SUSAN G KOMEN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION$10,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$10,000
THE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER$10,000
GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND$8,000
BERKELEY EAST BAY HUMANE SOCIETY$8,000
JOYBOUND PEOPLE AND PETS$6,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS N CA$6,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$5,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$5,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$4,000
COMMUNITY CONCERN FOR CATS$3,000
WASHBURN UNIVERSITY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $108k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PINES OF PEACE: $22k → 11%PINES OF PEACE: $22k → 11%PINES OF PEACE: $12k → 11%PINES OF PEACE: $10k → 11%PINES OF PEACE: $10k → 11%Pines of Peace: $10k → 11%Pines of Peace: $9k → 11%Pines of Peace: $7k → 11%Pines of Peace: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
CA
VA
AZ
KS
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$529k · 23 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
8

Total granted

$529k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+26%

Still filing today

61%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PINES OF PEACE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $108k · revenue +80%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $68k · revenue +145%
  • TM
    THE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER
    7× · 2019–2025 · $44k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • LU
    LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue -2%
  • TR
    The Ruth Bancroft Garden Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue -27%
  • JR
    Jessie Rees Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +44%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Inc

Protection of animal rights

Animals
2
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
3
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
4
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
5
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
6
Wildlife Conservation Society

The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

Animals
7
Four Paws International Inc

Our vision is a world where humans treat animals with respect, empathy and understanding. four paws mission is to be the strong, global and independent voice for animals.

Animals
8
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
9
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
10
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
11
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
12
Panthera Corporation

Panthera's mission is the conservation of the world's 40 wild cat species, many of which are endangered or threatened. panthera develops, implements and oversees wild cat conservation strategies on a global scale.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spca International Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pines of Peace Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
17/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SPECIAL OLYMPICS N CA: $28,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS N CASUSAN G KOMEN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $27,000 · OtherSUSAN G KOMEN BREAST CANCER FOU…PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $23,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODAmerican Cancer Society: $17,000 · OtherAmerican Cancer SocietyANIMAL RESCUE FOUNDATION: $17,000 · OtherANIMAL RESCUE FOUNDATIONTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $14,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION: $8,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $7,000 · OtherPlanned Parenthood of N CA: $6,000 · Other+4 more: $15,000 · Other+4 moreTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $44,000 · AnimalsTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTEREAST BAY SPCA: $35,000 · AnimalsEAST BAY SPCAJoybound People and Pets FKA Tony La Russa's Animal Rescue Foundation: $29,000 · AnimalsJoybound People and Pets FKA…COMMUNITY CONCERN FOR CATS INC: $13,000 · AnimalsCOMMUNITY CONCERN FOR CATS I…Berkeley East Bay Humane Society Inc dba Berkeley Humane: $13,000 · AnimalsBerkeley East Bay Humane Soc…SPCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,000 · Animals+2 more: $5,000 · AnimalsPINES OF PEACE INC: $107,950 · Human ServicesPINES OF PEACE INCGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $16,000 · Human ServicesGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $68,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDRE…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $7,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTH…Jessie Rees Foundation: $3,000 · Health+2 more: $3,000 · HealthWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $29,000 · EnvironmentThe Ruth Bancroft Garden Inc: $5,000 · EnvironmentLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $20,000 · EducationLINDSAY WILDLIFE MUSEUM: $16,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$162,000Animals$144,000Human Services$123,950Health$81,000Environment$34,000Education$20,000Arts & Culture$16,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPINES OF PEACE INC: $107,950 over 9y, 7.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $68,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $44,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetEAST BAY SPCA: $35,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $29,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJoybound People and Pets FKA Tony La Russa's Animal Rescue Foundation: $29,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLINDSAY WILDLIFE MUSEUM: $16,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY CONCERN FOR CATS INC: $13,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetBerkeley East Bay Humane Society Inc dba Berkeley Humane: $13,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Ruth Bancroft Garden Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSPCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJessie Rees Foundation: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PINES OF PEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds EAST BAY SPCA ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Joybound People and Pets FKA Tony La Russa's Animal Rescue Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds LINDSAY WILDLIFE MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CONCERN FOR CATS INC ↗
  • Who funds Berkeley East Bay Humane Society Inc dba Berkeley Humane ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds The Ruth Bancroft Garden Inc ↗
  • Who funds SPCA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds Jessie Rees Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company FoundationTX14.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · Marin Community Foundation · McKesson Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Todd Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Todd Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Todd Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph