Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tobola Educational Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$87k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$722kArts & Culture$44kRecreation & Sports$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $58k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $29k
$2,397
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UW EAU CLAIRE$17,392
CVTC$11,334
UW LA CROSSE$8,857
UW RIVER FALLS$6,997
NORTHCENTRAL TECHNICAL COLLEGE$6,491
UW STOUT$6,285
NORTHERN STATE UNIVERSITY$2,570
UW STEVENS POINT$2,500
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$2,397
UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS$2,397
UW - MILWAUKEE$2,397
NORTHWOOD TECHNICAL COLLEGE$2,397
COLORADO MESA UNIVERSITY$2,397
RIPON COLLEGE$2,397
VITERBO UNIVERSITY$2,100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS: $2k → 14%UMN MANKATO: $2k → 15%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $2k → 8%SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY: $650 → 16%UW RIVER FALLS: $7k → 9%RIPON COLLEGE: $2k → 9%UW STEVENS POINT: $3k → 10%UW WHITEWATER: $2k → 10%UW STOUT: $6k → 11%NORTHCENTRAL TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $6k → 11%UW-OSHKOSH: $1k → 11%UW EAU CLAIRE: $17k → 12%UW LA CROSSE: $9k → 12%NORTHWOOD TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $2k → 13%UW - PLATTEVILLE: $2k → 13%UW - MILWAUKEE: $2k → 17%COLORADO MESA UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%NORTHERN STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 11%CVTC: $11k → 12%VITERBO UNIVERSITY: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ND
MN
WI
MI
NY
SD
IA
IN
PA
CA
CO
NE
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$693k · 35 repeat orgs$85k to everyone else

35 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
37

Total granted

$693k
$76k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+11%

Still filing today

20%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VU
    VITERBO UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2017–2025 · $8k · revenue +11%
  • Cornell University
    2× · 2021–2022 · $7k · revenue +23%
  • SO
    ST OLAF COLLEGE
    4× · 2018–2021 · $6k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN LA CROSSE
    one grant, 2022 · $11k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN RIVER FALLS
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN EAU CLAIRE
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
2
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
3
Saint John's University

To foster the vitality of community through learning and the pursuit of wisdom.

—
4
Augsburg University

Augsburg university educates students to be informed citizens, thoughtful stewards, critical thinkers, and responsible leaders.the augsburg experience is supported by an engaged community that is committed to intentional diversity in its…

Education
5
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
6
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
7
Wisconsin Lutheran College Inc

Wisconsin lutheran college is a private, four-year liberal arts college.

—
8
The Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame

The corporation of saint mary's college, notre dame (saint mary's) is a catholic, residential, women's, liberal arts college offering undergraduate degrees and co-educational graduate programs. (continued in schedule o)

Education
9
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
10
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
11
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
12
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Norbert College Inc; the most unlike its peers is University of Wisconsin-Superior Alumni Assoc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CVTC: $121,856 · OtherCVTCUW-EAU CLAIRE: $117,781 · OtherUW-EAU CLAIREUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $94,571 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSINUW LA CROSSE: $57,456 · OtherUW LA CROSSEUW MADISON: $50,404 · OtherUW MADISONCHIPPEWA VALLEY TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $44,092 · OtherCHIPPEWA VALLEY TECHNICAL COLLEGEUW-STOUT: $40,504 · OtherUW-STOUTUW-STEVENS POINT: $25,811 · Other+52 more: $180,250 · Other+52 moreVITERBO UNIVERSITY: $7,685 · EducationCornell University: $6,772 · EducationST OLAF COLLEGE: $5,694 · EducationST NORBERT COLLEGE INC: $5,036 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $4,582 · EducationEDGEWOOD UNIVERSITY INC: $2,601 · EducationUniversity of St Thomas: $2,397 · EducationRIPON COLLEGE: $2,397 · EducationCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC: $2,286 · Education+8 more: $10,165 · Education
Other$732,725Education$49,615

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVITERBO UNIVERSITY: $7,685 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $6,772 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST OLAF COLLEGE: $5,694 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST NORBERT COLLEGE INC: $5,036 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $4,582 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEDGEWOOD UNIVERSITY INC: $2,601 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of St Thomas: $2,397 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIPON COLLEGE: $2,397 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC: $2,286 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetColorado Christian University: $1,550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY: $1,550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHER COLLEGE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMACALESTER COLLEGE: $1,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHLAND COLLEGE: $1,320 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDORDT UNIVERSITY: $1,320 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMarquette University: $1,275 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-SUPERIOR ALUMNI ASSOC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetINDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VITERBO UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds ST OLAF COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ST NORBERT COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds EDGEWOOD UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds University of St Thomas ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Herb Kohl Educational Foundation IncWI17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Herb Kohl Educational Foundation Inc · Edwin E and Janet L Bryant Foundation Inc · Lee Griffin Scholarship Fund · Culver's Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tobola Educational Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tobola Educational Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tobola Educational’s filings →

    More from the funding graph