Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Herb Kohl Educational Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
425
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0184% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$15MRecreation & Sports$214kArts & Culture$65kScience & Tech$57kCommunity Improvement$42kReligion$39kSocial Science$34kYouth Development$34kOther$0
02FY2025 · 425 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k420 grants · $2.0M
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $58k
$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$14k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SUN PRAIRIE EAST HIGH SCHOOL$15,000
WISCONSIN FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATIONAL ADMIN$12,500
CARLETON COLLEGE$10,000
GREENVILLE TECHNICAL COLLEGE$10,000
MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY$10,000
Individual grant recipient$9,000
GLENWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$9,000
Individual grant recipient$9,000
DARLINGTON ELEMENTARYMIDDLE SCHOOL$9,000
RIPON COLLEGE$8,153
MID-STATE TECHNICAL COLLEGE$7,500
NECEDAH MIDDLEHIGH SCHOOL$6,000
BAYFIELD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$6,000
MERRIMAC COMMUNITY SCHOOL$6,000
CRANDON MIDDLE SCHOOL$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 69% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WISCONSIN LUTHERAN COLLEGE: $10k → 5%UNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN OHIO: $10k → 5%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISON: $10k → 6%UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS: $10k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - GREEN BAY: $10k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISON: $10k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISON: $10k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISON: $10k → 9%MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY: $10k → 9%ST NORBERT COLLEGE: $10k → 9%CHIPPEWA VALLEY TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $10k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - OSHKOSH: $10k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - STEVENS POINT: $10k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MILWAUKEE: $10k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISON: $10k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - STOUT: $10k → 10%GATEWAY TECHNICAL COLLEGE - KENOSHA: $10k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - GREEN BAY: $10k → 10%BETHEL UNIVERSITY: $10k → 10%COE COLLEGE: $10k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - GREEN BAY: $10k → 10%TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY: $10k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - STEVENS POINT: $10k → 11%IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%ST NORBERT COLLEGE: $10k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - RIVER FALLS: $10k → 11%CARTHAGE COLLEGE: $10k → 11%NORTHCENTRAL TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $10k → 11%FOX VALLEY TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $10k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE: $10k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - GREEN BAY: $10k → 11%CARLETON COLLEGE: $10k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - PLATTEVILLE: $10k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - GREEN BAY: $10k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON - SEATTLE: $10k → 12%KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 12%NORTH CENTRAL TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $10k → 12%NORTH CENTRAL TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $10k → 12%UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY: $10k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA: $10k → 13%WESTERN TECHNICAL COLLEGE - LACROSSE: $10k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - STOUT: $10k → 14%LORI DANZ: $15k → 11%WISCONSIN FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATIONAL ADMIN: $13k → 10%BRIAN COLLINS: $15k → 9%WISCONSIN FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATIONAL ADMIN: $13k → 10%SUN PRAIRIE EAST HIGH SCHOOL: $15k → 10%KABBY HONG: $15k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
AZ
TN
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$11M · 277 repeat orgs$7.2M to everyone else

277 repeat relationships — 113 still active in FY2025, 164 since wound down; 74 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

277
982

Total granted

$11M
$6.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+15%

Still filing today

9%
1%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $835k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    Marquette University
    6× · 2020–2025 · $250k · revenue +24%
  • ST NORBERT COLLEGE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $128k · revenue +8%
  • CU
    CARROLL UNIVERSITY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $114k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITIY OF WISCONSIN - MILWAUKEE
    one grant, 2020 · $23k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA - ROCHESTER
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • NR
    NEW RICHMOND HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $18k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
2
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
3
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
4
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
5
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

6
Cornell College

Cornell college offers an innovative and rigorous learning community where faculty and staff collaborate with students to develop the intellectual curiosity, creativity and moral courage necessary for a lifetime of learning and engaged…

Education
7
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
8
Augsburg University

Augsburg university educates students to be informed citizens, thoughtful stewards, critical thinkers, and responsible leaders.the augsburg experience is supported by an engaged community that is committed to intentional diversity in its…

Education
9
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
10
Mount Saint Mary's University Inc

As a catholic university, mount st. mary's graduates ethical leaders who are inspired by a passion for learning and lead lives of significance in service to god and others.

Education
11
Xavier University

Xavier is a jesuit catholic university rooted in the liberal arts tradition. our mission is to educate each student intellectually, morally, and spiritually. we create learning opportunities through rigorous academic and professional…

Education
12
Luther College

Founded by the norwegian evangelical lutheran church in 1861, luther college is a four-year, residential liberal arts institution. luther welcomes students of all backgrounds to engage in a way of learning that moves beyond immediate…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Norbert College Inc and the most unlike its peers is University of Wisconsin-Superior Alumni Assoc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity College Foundatio…Community FoundationsJewish Community Organizati…Independent K-12 SchoolsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 80 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr20%11%10–20yr16%2%20–35yr16%16%35–55yr19%71%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr20%7%10–20yr16%1%20–35yr16%14%35–55yr19%78%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/58
the rest of the field
8%
3,022/36,468

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 1,333 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/33
Grantees still filing
24/33
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISON — $1,566,324 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISONUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - STEVENS POINT — $332,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - LACROSSE — $331,000 · Other+181 more — $7,332,021 · Other+181 moreMarquette University — $250,497 · EducationMarquette U…ST NORBERT COLLEGE INC — $127,500 · EducationST NORBERT …CARROLL UNIVERSITY INC — $113,750 · EducationCARROLL UNI…MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING — $92,500 · EducationMILWAUKEE S…CARTHAGE COLLEGE — $83,900 · EducationCARTHAGE CO…CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC — $77,500 · EducationCONCORDIA U…VITERBO UNIVERSITY — $67,500 · EducationVITERBO UNI…EDGEWOOD UNIVERSITY INC — $62,500 · EducationEDGEWOOD UN…MADISON AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $53,379 · EducationRIPON COLLEGE — $43,153 · Education+6 more — $149,000 · Education+6 more
Other$9,561,845Education$1,121,179

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMarquette University — $250,497 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST NORBERT COLLEGE INC — $127,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCARROLL UNIVERSITY INC — $113,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING — $92,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCARTHAGE COLLEGE — $83,900 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC — $77,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVITERBO UNIVERSITY — $67,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEDGEWOOD UNIVERSITY INC — $62,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMADISON AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $53,379 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetWISCONSIN LUTHERAN COLLEGE INC — $52,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRIPON COLLEGE — $43,153 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE INSTITUTE OF ART & DESIGN INC — $42,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNT MARY UNIVERSITY INC — $40,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-SUPERIOR ALUMNI ASSOC — $37,500 over 5y, 38% of budgetST AUGUSTINE PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC — $36,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLAKELAND UNIVERSITY — $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARIAN UNIVERSITY INC — $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWISCONSIN FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION INC — $25,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetHIGHLAND COMMUNITY SCHOOL INC — $24,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBELLIN COLLEGE INC — $20,221 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBELOIT COLLEGE — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINDIAN COMMUNITY SCHOOL INC — $18,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARDINAL STRITCH UNIVERSITY INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Marquette University
  • Who funds ST NORBERT COLLEGE INC
  • Who funds CARROLL UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING
  • Who funds CARTHAGE COLLEGE
  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds VITERBO UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds EDGEWOOD UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds MADISON AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI46.2× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Harley-Davidson Foundation Inc · Archdiocese of Milwaukee Catholic Community Foundation Inc · Cedar Street Charitable Foundation Inc · Culver's Foundation Inc · Youth Foundation Inc · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Bradley Impact Fund Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Herb Kohl Educational Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Herb Kohl Educational Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Herb Kohl Educational Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 1333 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph