Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lee Griffin Scholarship Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$122k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$531kRecreation & Sports$94k
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $87k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$669k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN LACROSSE$26,250
Individual grant recipient$15,250
SOUTHWEST WISCONSIN TECH COLLEGE$12,000
UNIV OF WISCONSIN PLATTEVILLE$12,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON$11,000
UNIV OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE$10,000
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY$8,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN OSHKOSH$5,750
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN OF STEVENS POINT$5,000
WESTERN TECHNICAL COLLEGE$4,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN RIVER FALLS$3,000
ST NORBERT COLLEGE$2,500
UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI$2,000
LORAS COLLEGE$2,000
RIPON COLLEGE$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTHLEE: $2k → 15%MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 15%LORAS COLLEGE: $5k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN RIVER FALLS: $3k → 9%ST NORBERT COLLEGE: $3k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN OF STEVENS POINT: $5k → 10%UNIV OF WISCONSIN WHITEWATER: $4k → 10%BELOIT COLLEGE: $6k → 10%MADISON AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $2k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN OSHKOSH: $6k → 11%UNIV WISCONSIN EAU: $19k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN LACROSSE: $32k → 12%KICKAPOO HIGH SCHOOL: $80k → 12%SOUTHWEST WISCONSIN TECH COLLEGE: $12k → 13%UNIV OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE: $10k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI: $2k → 18%SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 13%LORAS COLLEGE: $5k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN RIVER FALLS: $3k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN OF STEVENS POINT: $3k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON: $56k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN OSHKOSH: $4k → 11%UNIV WISCONSIN EAU: $15k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN LACROSSE: $26k → 12%KICKAPOO HIGH SCHOOL: $70k → 12%SOUTHWEST WISCONSIN TECH COLLEGE: $12k → 13%UNIV OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE: $10k → 17%LORAS COLLEGE: $2k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON: $17k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN OSHKOSH: $4k → 11%UNIV WISCONSIN EAU: $5k → 12%WESTERN TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $13k → 12%SOUTHWEST WISCONSIN TECH COLLEGE: $12k → 13%UNIV OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE: $10k → 17%LORAS COLLEGE: $2k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON: $11k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN OSHKOSH: $3k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN LACROSSE: $10k → 12%SOUTHWEST WISCONSIN TECH COLLEGE: $6k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON: $11k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN LACROSSE: $10k → 12%UNIV OF WISCONSIN PLATTEVILLE: $25k → 13%WESTERN TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $7k → 12%UNIV OF WISCONSIN PLATTEVILLE: $21k → 13%VITERBO UNIVERSITY: $5k → 12%UNIV OF WISCONSIN PLATTEVILLE: $12k → 13%WESTERN TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $4k → 12%VITERBO UNIVERSITY: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$605k · 17 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
6

Total granted

$605k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%
0%

Still filing today

18%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KH
    KICKAPOO HIGH SCHOOL
    2× · 2020–2021 · $150k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON
    4× · 2022–2025 · $95k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN LACROSSE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $78k

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIV OF WISCONSIN WHITEWATER
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
  • MS
    MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • MA
    MADISON AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE
    one grant, 2022 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
2
Missouri Western State University

Promote private giving and help the university move into the forefront of public higher education.

3
Augustana College

Offer a challenging education that develops the qualities of mind, spirit and body for students.

Education
4
Furman University

Furman university is an institution of higher education providing distinctive undergraduate education emphasizing an engaged approach combining classroom learning with real world experiences and self-discovery.

Education
5
Pacific University

A diverse sustainable community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship, and practice, pacific inspires students to think, care, and pursue justice in our world

Education
6
Simpson College

A residential, coeducation, undergraduate liberal arts college.

Education
7
Lafayette College

Provision of educational services as an accredited four-year undergraduate college.

Education
8
University of Wisconsin - Green Bay Foundation Inc

The foundation exists to support the university of wisconsin - green bay in its quest to provide an education to all who seek one. this is done through scholarship, research support, capital acquisitions, and investing in the staff and…

Education
9
Hilbert College

Hilbert college is an independent institution of higher learning that embraces its catholic franciscan heritage and values. students from diverse backgrounds are educated in liberal arts and professional programs to become informed…

Education
10
Marian University Inc

Marian university is a catholic liberal arts institution of higher learning offering undergraduate, graduate, and continuing education programs with approximately 1,200 students annually.

Education
11
Cornell College

To create a space where students can develop intellectual curiosity, creativity and moral courage.

Education
12
University of New Haven

University of new haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts & professional education.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Norbert College Inc and the most unlike its peers is Western Technical College Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
1/6
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

KICKAPOO HIGH SCHOOL — $149,950 · OtherKICKAPOO HIGH SCHOOLUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON — $95,250 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISONUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN LACROSSE — $77,750 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN LACROSSEUNIV OF WISCONSIN PLATTEVILLE — $57,000 · OtherUNIV OF WISCONSIN PLATTEVILLESOUTHWEST WISCONSIN TECH COLLEGE — $42,000 · OtherSOUTHWEST WISCONSIN TECH COLLEGEIndividual grant recipient — $39,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIV OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE — $31,000 · OtherWESTERN TECHNICAL COLLEGE — $23,000 · Other+14 more — $88,500 · Other+14 moreVITERBO UNIVERSITY — $9,500 · EducationBELOIT COLLEGE — $8,000 · EducationST NORBERT COLLEGE INC — $2,500 · EducationRIPON COLLEGE — $1,500 · Education
Other$603,700Education$21,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLORAS COLLEGE — $14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVITERBO UNIVERSITY — $9,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBELOIT COLLEGE — $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST NORBERT COLLEGE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIPON COLLEGE — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-SUPERIOR ALUMNI ASSOC — $1,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LORAS COLLEGE
  • Who funds VITERBO UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds BELOIT COLLEGE
  • Who funds ST NORBERT COLLEGE INC
  • Who funds RIPON COLLEGE
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-SUPERIOR ALUMNI ASSOC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tobola Educational TrustMN13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tobola Educational Trust · Herb Kohl Educational Foundation Inc · Culver's Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lee Griffin Scholarship Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph