Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Tj Kavanagh Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$870k
Granted FY2024still arriving
54
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Education$2.0MReligion$968kHuman Services$642kHealth$380kRecreation & Sports$264kPhilanthropy$264kArts & Culture$218kCommunity Improvement$144kOther$0
02FY2024 · 54 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k30 grants · $120k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $355k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $395k
$8,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KENNEDY CATHOLIC FAMILY OF SCHOOLS$125,000
PRINCE OF PEACE CTR$90,000
FH BUHL TRUSTEES$70,000
NOTRE DAME CHURCH$60,000
ST MICHAEL'S SCHOOL$50,000
BUHL PARK CORPORATION$40,000
HOPE CTR FOR ARTS AND TECHNOLOGY$40,000
SLIPPERY ROCK UNIVERSITY$30,000
JOHN XXIII HOME$25,000
AREA COMMUNITY THEATER$25,000
WILLOW WOMEN'S CENTER$20,000
THE PENN STATE UNIVERSITY$20,000
ST BARTHOLOMEWS ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH$15,000
ST EULALIA'S CHURCH$15,000
ST JOSEPH'S CHURCH$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $155k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ST PAULS HOMES: $5k → 13%WILLOW WOMENS CENTER: $35k → 13%WILLOW WOMEN'S CENTER: $20k → 13%WILLOW WOMENS CENTER: $20k → 13%WILLOW WOMENS CENTER: $20k → 13%WILLOW WOMENS CENTER: $20k → 13%WILLOW WOMEN'S CENTER: $20k → 13%ARC OF MERCER COUNTY: $5k → 13%ARC OF MERCER COUNTY: $5k → 13%ARC OF MERCER COUNTY: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.8M · 75 repeat orgs$386k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +11% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

75 repeat relationships — 49 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

75
37

Total granted

$4.8M
$372k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+4%

Still filing today

21%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthRecreation & SportsEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PO
    PRINCE OF PEACE CENTER
    6× · 2019–2024 · $490k · revenue +2%
  • BP
    BUHL PARK CORPORATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $221k · revenue +128%
  • WW
    Willow Womens Center
    6× · 2019–2024 · $135k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • PS
    PENN STATE SHENANGO
    one grant, 2019 · $45k
  • SO
    SISTER OF THE HOLY CHILD JESUS CONVENT
    one grant, 2022 · $35k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sharon Community Health Center Inc

Sharon community health center is a not for profit community based primary medical care organization dedicated to providing quality healthcare to residents of sharon, pa and the surrounding area without regards to their ability to pay.

Health
2
St Josephs Center

St. Joseph's Center (the "Center") is a not-for-profit corporation founded by the Congregation of Sisters, Servants of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, Scranton, Pennsylvania. The Center is located in Lackawanna County, PA and provides…

Human Services
3
Saucon Valley Community Center

A community center which provides a meeting place and programs for the recreation and social welfare of all age groups in the community.

4
Sugar Valley Lodge Inc

To provide a personal care boarding home for adults of venango county.

Housing & Shelter
5
Bucksport Area Child Care Center

It is our mission to provide a child-centered environment, treating each child and family with respect.

Human Services
6
St Joseph Care Center

To help residents live to their fullest potential, recognizing the changing needs of each person.

Health
7
Center for Community Resources Inc

To coordinate services among private and government agencies for specialized populations to ensure service continuity, reduce duplication, and assist individuals and families in accessing appropriate mental health, intellectual…

Health
8
Saint Joseph Villa

The mission of saint joseph villa is rooted in the mission of the sisters of st. joseph who founded and sponsor the villa. the sisters' mission of uniting people with god and with one another is the primary focus of the staff at the villa.…

9
Muskingum Valley Health Center

To provide affordable, accessible, and quality healthcare.

Health
10
Seton Health At Schuyler Ridge Residential Healthcare

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. seton health at schuyler ridge residential healthcare (schuyler…

Health
11
Monongahela Valley Hospital Inc

The mission of penn highlands mon valley is to enhance the health of the residents of the mid-monongahela valley area by providing outstanding healthcare services.

Health
12
Shenango Presbyterian Seniorcare

Shenango Presbyterian Seniorcare is a Christian non-profit continuing care retirement community providing nursing care, personal care, and independent housing for the elderly, in a quality dignified living environment. The residents are…

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Prince of Peace Center and the most unlike its peers is Willow Womens Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 62 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr13%7%5–10yr21%16%10–20yr19%16%20–35yr15%7%35–55yr14%55%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr21%17%10–20yr19%13%20–35yr15%1%35–55yr14%69%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
9%
357/3,822

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 117 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

KENNEDY CATHOLIC FAMILY OF SCHOOLS — $875,000 · OtherKENNEDY CATHOLIC FAMILY OF SCHOOLSPRINCE OF PEACE CENTER — $490,000 · OtherPRINCE OF PEACE CENTERST MICHAEL SCHOOL — $300,000 · OtherST MICHAEL SCHOOLNOTRE DAME CHURCH — $250,000 · OtherNOTRE DAME CHURCHFH BUHL TRUSTEES — $250,000 · OtherFH BUHL TRUSTEESBUHL PARK CORPORATION — $220,750 · OtherAREA COMMUNITY THEATER — $157,000 · Other+99 more — $2,129,612 · Other+99 moreWillow Womens Center — $135,000 · Human ServicesTHE ARC OF MERCER COUNTY — $15,000 · Human Services+1 more — $5,000 · Human ServicesSAINT JOHN XXIII HOME — $125,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S CENTER OF MERCER COUNTY — $30,000 · HealthCOMPREHENSIVE LEARNING CENTER INC — $60,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC — $30,000 · EducationSLIPPERY ROCK UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · EducationHOPE CENTER FOR ARTS AND TECHNOLOGY INC — $70,000 · Arts & CultureHEAVENLY GAITS THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC — $13,000 · Recreation & SportsSHENANGO RIVER WATCHERS INC — $9,000 · Environment
Other$4,672,362Human Services$155,000Health$155,000Education$100,000Arts & Culture$70,000Recreation & Sports$13,000Environment$9,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPRINCE OF PEACE CENTER — $490,000 over 6y, 12% of budgetBUHL PARK CORPORATION — $220,750 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetWillow Womens Center — $135,000 over 6y, 19% of budgetSAINT JOHN XXIII HOME — $125,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetHOPE CENTER FOR ARTS AND TECHNOLOGY INC — $70,000 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetCOMPREHENSIVE LEARNING CENTER INC — $60,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC — $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S CENTER OF MERCER COUNTY — $30,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetBUHL COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER — $28,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetKEYSTONE BLIND ASSOCIATION — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARC OF MERCER COUNTY — $15,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetHEAVENLY GAITS THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC — $13,000 over 5y, 8.2% of budgetDELAWARE VALLEY UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSLIPPERY ROCK UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHENANGO RIVER WATCHERS INC — $9,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MERCER COUNTY — $9,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetShenango Valley YMCA — $9,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetSHENANGO VALLEY CHORALE — $7,000 over 6y, 5.1% of budgetST PAUL HOMES — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCoudersport Volunteer Fire Dep — $4,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFREDONIA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT — $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PRINCE OF PEACE CENTER
  • Who funds BUHL PARK CORPORATION
  • Who funds Willow Womens Center
  • Who funds SAINT JOHN XXIII HOME
  • Who funds HOPE CENTER FOR ARTS AND TECHNOLOGY INC
  • Who funds COMPREHENSIVE LEARNING CENTER INC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Western Pennsylvania and Eastern OhioPA33.7× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Western Pennsylvania and Eastern Ohio · Buhl Regional Health Foundation · Aj and Sigismunda Palumbo Charitable Trust · Edward J Kavanagh Foundation · James Frances McCandless Trust · United Way of Mercer County · The Pittsburgh Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Tj Kavanagh Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tj Kavanagh Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Tj Kavanagh Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 117 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph