Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tj Brown & Ca Lupton Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$560k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$4.0MArts & Culture$3.0MEducation$2.5MAnimals$2.2MHealth$2.0MYouth Development$830kEnvironment$250kHuman Services$240kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $175k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $425k
  • $250k+5 grants · $2.2M
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$30M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TCU - FLYING T CLUB$560,000
TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY$540,000
TCU - ATHLETICS HUMAN PERFORMANCE CENTER$466,667
NATIONAL COWGIRL MUSEUM AND HALL OF FAME$335,000
EVENT FACILITIES FORT WORTH$250,000
UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER$200,000
NATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION$100,000
MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$75,000
SAVING HOPE FOUNDATION$50,000
COOK CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER$40,000
SECOND STAGE THEATRE$35,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF NORTH TEXAS$30,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
ZACH THEATER$20,000
GILL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LENA POPE HOME: $25k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$18M · 34 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

34 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
11

Total granted

$18M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+87%

Still filing today

62%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationAnimalsYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2020–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +40%
  • NC
    NATIONAL COWGIRL MUSEUM AND HALL OF FAME INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +364%
  • MA
    MULTIPURPOSE ARENA FORT WORTH
    3× · 2019–2022 · $1.0M · revenue ×1,873

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $1.0M
  • PARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXASgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +89%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Witte Museum

The witte museum inspires people to shape the future of texas through transformative and relevant experiences in nature, science and culture.

Arts & Culture
2
Fort Worth Art Association

The fort worth art assocation, a texas non-profit corporation, was established to acquire a collection of works of modern art of the highest quality and to promulgate and maintain a program of art activities and art education in fort…

Arts & Culture
3
Kimbell Art Foundation
Arts & Culture
4
Texas & Southwestern Cattle Raisers' Foundation

Texas & southwestern cattle raisers' foundation (foundation) will build platforms to preserve the history and advance the future of the livestock industry in the southwest through cattle raisers museum exhibits, education initiatives and…

Arts & Culture
5
Fort Worth Academy for the Education of Children and Youth

Education of children and youth

Education
6
Fort Worth Art Association Endowment Foundation

To operate exclusively for the benefit of the fort worth art association, a sec. 501(c)(3) organization. the foundation is responsible for the administration of the long term investments held for the benefit of the association and its…

Arts & Culture
7
Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce

To act as the voice of business, articulating a business perspective and advocating policies supported by the fort worth general business community.

—
8
Tyler Museum of Art

Educational and cultural center to enrich lives through collection, study, exhibition, interpretation and celebration of visual arts.

Arts & Culture
9
Stage West Theatre Formerly Allied Theatre Group Inc

To produce theatre that entertains, enriches and inspires.

Arts & Culture
10
Fort Worth Symphony Orchestra Association

See schedule o-to perform great symphonic music at the highest level of artistic excellence to educate, entertain, and enhance cultural life.-to present engaging music education programs for young people to foster early interest in and…

Arts & Culture
11
Texas Wesleyan University

Texas wesleyan university, guided by its deep methodist heritage, provides transformational learning experiences and research opportunities to a diverse group of students to develop their full potential as individuals and as members of the…

Education
12
Baylor All Saints Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Performing Arts Fort Worth Inc; the most unlike its peers is Saving Hope Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
20/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $2,660,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTCU - FLYING T CLUB: $1,560,000 · OtherTCU - FLYING T CLUBTCU - ATHLETICS HUMAN PERFORMANCE CENTER: $1,466,667 · OtherTCU - ATHLETICS HUMAN PERFORMANCE CENTERUT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER: $1,200,000 · OtherUT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $1,000,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTCU - FROG CLUB: $710,000 · OtherTCU - FROG CLUBMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $435,000 · Other+20 more: $1,145,000 · Other+20 moreNATIONAL COWGIRL MUSEUM AND HALL OF FAME INC: $1,580,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL COWGIR…FORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND HISTORY: $325,000 · Arts & CultureFORT WORTH MUSE…THE SECOND STAGE THEATRE INC: $315,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SECOND STAG…AMON CARTER MUSEUM OF WESTERN ART: $180,000 · Arts & CultureAMON CARTER MUS…ZACHARY SCOTT THEATRE CENTER: $130,000 · Arts & CultureVan Cliburn Foundation Inc: $105,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $60,000 · Arts & CultureTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $2,275,000 · EducationTEXAS CHRISTIA…FORT WORTH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC: $100,000 · EducationGILL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $100,000 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · EducationTHE FORT WORTH ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION: $615,000 · AnimalsSAVING HOPE FOUNDATION: $450,000 · AnimalsHumane Society of North Texas: $225,000 · AnimalsNATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $200,000 · AnimalsMULTIPURPOSE ARENA FORT WORTH: $1,000,000 · Recreation & SportsFORT WORTH JUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 · Recreation & SportsEVENT FACILITIES FORT WORTH INC: $770,000 · Youth DevelopmentRIVERTREE ACADEMY: $80,000 · Youth DevelopmentCook Children's Medical Center: $375,000 · Health
Other$10,176,667Arts & Culture$2,695,000Education$2,480,000Animals$1,490,000Recreation & Sports$1,060,000Youth Development$850,000Health$375,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $2,275,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL COWGIRL MUSEUM AND HALL OF FAME INC: $1,580,000 over 8y, 8.8% of budgetMULTIPURPOSE ARENA FORT WORTH: $1,000,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetEVENT FACILITIES FORT WORTH INC: $770,000 over 4y, 7.4% of budgetTHE FORT WORTH ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION: $615,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetSAVING HOPE FOUNDATION: $450,000 over 9y, 16% of budgetCook Children's Medical Center: $375,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND HISTORY: $325,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetTHE SECOND STAGE THEATRE INC: $315,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetHumane Society of North Texas: $225,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetOLD JAIL ART CENTER: $200,000 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetNATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMON CARTER MUSEUM OF WESTERN ART: $180,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetZACHARY SCOTT THEATRE CENTER: $130,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetVan Cliburn Foundation Inc: $105,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetTHE GATEHOUSE CORPORATION: $100,000 over 4y, 69% of budgetFORT WORTH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGILL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $100,000 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetRIVERTREE ACADEMY: $80,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetFORT WORTH JUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetPERFORMING ARTS FORT WORTH INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLENA POPE HOME INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFORT WORTH REPORT: $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILL SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 18% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COWGIRL MUSEUM AND HALL OF FAME INC ↗
  • Who funds MULTIPURPOSE ARENA FORT WORTH ↗
  • Who funds EVENT FACILITIES FORT WORTH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FORT WORTH ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SAVING HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Cook Children's Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds FORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds THE SECOND STAGE THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds Humane Society of North Texas ↗
  • Who funds OLD JAIL ART CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMON CARTER MUSEUM OF WESTERN ART ↗
  • Who funds ZACHARY SCOTT THEATRE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Van Cliburn Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE GATEHOUSE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds FORT WORTH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds GILL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVERTREE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds FORT WORTH JUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PERFORMING ARTS FORT WORTH INC ↗
  • Who funds PARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds LENA POPE HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds FORT WORTH REPORT ↗
  • Who funds Tarrant Area Food Bank ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amon G Carter FoundationTX34.6× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amon G Carter Foundation · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Bnsf Railway Foundation · The Roach Foundation Inc · Garvey Texas Foundation Inc · Leo Potishman Foundation Xxxxx3002 · Mary Potishman Lard Trust Walker C Friedman Co Trustee · Sid W Richardson Foundation · Wm & Catherine Bryce Memorial Fund Xxxxx3001 · William E Scott Foundation · Kleinheinz Family Foundation For The Arts And Education · Amon G Carter-Star Tele Emply Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tj Brown & Ca Lupton Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tj Brown & Ca Lupton Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tj Brown & Ca Lupton Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Tj Brown & Ca Lupton Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tj Brown & Ca Lupton’s filings →

    More from the funding graph