Skip to content

· Private foundation

Titus Fellowship of Sioux City Ltd

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$289k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$51k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.1MEducation$323kHealth$252kYouth Development$183kHuman Services$128kInternational$68kRecreation & Sports$52kCivil Rights$47kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $219k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
$19,700
Median grant
7
States reached
$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GOSPELLINK INC$51,200
SIOUXLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS$39,600
SIOUX CITY GOSPEL MISSIONS$36,415
AWANA INTERNATIONAL$33,970
CHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP$22,260
STEMM$20,600
PRE-BORN$19,700
SIOUXLAND YOUTH FOR CHRIST$17,585
HER HEALTH WOMENS CENTER$17,385
ETHNOS 360$11,944
UNION GOSPEL MISSIONS$8,836
GRACE EVANGELICAL SOCIETY$5,000
EVANTELL$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $128k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PRE-BORN: $20k → 16%PRE-BORN: $20k → 16%PRE-BORN: $20k → 16%PRE-BORN: $12k → 16%PRE-BORN: $12k → 16%THE GOSPEL MISSION: $15k → 13%THE GOSPEL MISSION: $15k → 13%THE GOSPEL MISSION: $15k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 19 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
3

Total granted

$2.5M
$66k

Still filing today

42%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CE
    Child Evangelism Fellowship of Iowa
    9× · 2017–2025 · $320k · revenue +28%
  • HH
    HER HEALTH WOMENS CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $199k · revenue +73%
  • SY
    SIOUXLAND YOUTH FOR CHRIST
    9× · 2017–2025 · $183k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $42k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $24k
  • UL
    UNITED LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $400
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Media Outreach

Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.

Religion
2
Passionlife Ministries Inc

Passionlife ministries is a global missions initiative to spread the gospel of life and expand the pregnancy help movement among nations plagued by abortion, infanticide and gendercide.

Religion
3
Mike Silva Evangelism International Inc

To preach the gospel of Jesus Christ to those who have not heard and to mobilize the church to evangelism.

—
4
Go and Tell Evangelism Corporation

Provide an easy and practical way to equip believers of jesus to share the gospel with others and to equip all believers to be active in sharing thier faith so that they will have a full understanding of every good thing they have in…

Religion
5
Grace Global Ministries Inc

Grace Global Ministries exists to assist local churches in sending global workers to fulfill the Great Commission.

International
6
L I F E Ministries Inc Community Pregnancy Center

Our mission is to affirm life through evangelism, education, counseling and practical assistance.

Health
7
Go With God Global

The organizations mission is enhancing the legal distribution of free bibles and equipping and discipling pastors and trainers to use the word of god effectively.

Religion
8
The Human Choice of Iowa

Mission is to provide women facing an unplanned pregnancy with truthful medical information and education. we are faith-based with a mission to encourage, through education and outreach, the recognition of human life from the moment of…

Human Services
9
Global Impact Ministries Inc Dba Love Life

Love Life is uniting and mobilizing the church to create a culture of love and life that will bring an end to abortion and the orphan crisis.

Religion
10
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion
11
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
12
In Christ Ministries Inc

In Christ Ministries exists to bring the message of Gods love grace and truth to children teens and adults. We do this through training and outreach events.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Gospel Mission; the most unlike its peers is Gospelink Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SIOUXLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS: $323,230 · OtherSIOUXLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOLSAWANA INTERNATIONAL: $260,390 · OtherAWANA INTERNATIONALSIOUX CITY GOSPEL MISSIONS: $234,575 · OtherSIOUX CITY GOSPEL MISSIONSHER HEALTH WOMENS CENTER: $199,355 · OtherHER HEALTH WOMENS CENTERETHNOS360 INC: $103,852 · OtherETHNOS360 INCSIOUXLAND TANZANIA EDUCATIONAL MED: $67,600 · OtherUNION GOSPEL MISSION: $57,868 · OtherSTEMM: $52,600 · OtherFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $52,000 · Other+5 more: $99,628 · Other+5 moreChild Evangelism Fellowship of Iowa: $320,230 · Youth DevelopmentChild Evangelism Fello…SIOUXLAND YOUTH FOR CHRIST: $182,955 · Youth DevelopmentSIOUXLAND YOUTH FOR CH…GOSPELINK INC: $355,555 · ReligionGOSPELINK INCEvanTell Inc: $35,000 · ReligionEvanTell IncAWANA CLUBS INTERNATIONAL AND AFFILIATES: $34,485 · ReligionAWANA CLUBS INTERNA…+1 more: $10,000 · ReligionMission Pre-Born Inc: $82,700 · Human ServicesTHE GOSPEL MISSION: $45,000 · Human Services
Other$1,451,098Youth Development$503,185Religion$435,040Human Services$127,700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGOSPELINK INC: $355,555 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetChild Evangelism Fellowship of Iowa: $320,230 over 9y, 10% of budgetHER HEALTH WOMENS CENTER: $199,355 over 9y, 6.5% of budgetSIOUXLAND YOUTH FOR CHRIST: $182,955 over 9y, 3.1% of budgetMission Pre-Born Inc: $82,700 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GOSPEL MISSION: $45,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetEvanTell Inc: $35,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetAWANA CLUBS INTERNATIONAL AND AFFILIATES: $34,485 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGRACE EVANGELICAL SOCIETY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GOSPELINK INC ↗
  • Who funds Child Evangelism Fellowship of Iowa ↗
  • Who funds HER HEALTH WOMENS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SIOUXLAND YOUTH FOR CHRIST ↗
  • Who funds Mission Pre-Born Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE GOSPEL MISSION ↗
  • Who funds EvanTell Inc ↗
  • Who funds AWANA CLUBS INTERNATIONAL AND AFFILIATES ↗
  • Who funds GRACE EVANGELICAL SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Renaissance Charitable Foundation IncIN14× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Titus Fellowship of Sioux City Ltd funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Titus Fellowship of Sioux City Ltd. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Titus Fellowship of Sioux City Ltd?

    Find your warmest path to Titus Fellowship of Sioux City Ltd through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Titus Fellowship of Sioux City Ltd’s filings →

    More from the funding graph