Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tim and Mary Boyle Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$67k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$238kFood & Nutrition$212kHuman Services$64kHealth$61kEducation$31kCrime & Legal$19kYouth Development$6k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$966k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OREGON FOOD BANK$13,000
PATH HOME (PORTLAND HOMLESS FAMILY SOLUTIONS)$7,000
BLANCHET HOUSE$6,000
SUNSHINE DIVISION$6,000
NEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH$5,000
ROSE HAVEN$5,000
MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE$5,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF OREGON$4,000
CASA FOR CHILDREN$4,000
WILLIAM TEMPLE HOUSE$4,000
CLATSOP COMMUNITY ACTION$3,000
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF THE COLUMBIA PACIFIC$2,000
JOY RX CHILDRENS CANCER ASSOCIATION$2,000
POTLUCK IN THE PARK$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ST MARY'S HOME FOR BOYS: $3k → 8%ST MARY'S HOME FOR BOYS: $3k → 8%CLACKAMAS SERVICE CENTER: $8k → 12%CLACKAMAS SERVICE CENTER: $4k → 12%CLACKAMAS SERVICE CENTER: $3k → 12%CLACKAMAS SERVICE CENTER: $3k → 12%CLACKAMAS SERVICE CENTER: $2k → 12%CLACKAMAS SERVICE CENTER: $2k → 12%STORE TO DOOR: $1k → 12%CLACKAMAS SERVICE CENTER: $2k → 12%STORE TO DOOR: $1k → 12%CLACKAMAS SERVICE CENTER: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$680k · 26 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +76% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
4

Total granted

$680k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
0%

Still filing today

85%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesFood & NutritionHealthCrime & LegalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OREGON FOOD BANK
    9× · 2017–2025 · $101k · revenue +70%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY PORTLAND METRO EAST
    8× · 2017–2024 · $90k · revenue +58%
  • PH
    PATH HOME
    8× · 2017–2024 · $60k · revenue +324%

Funded once

  • PH
    PATH HOME (PORTLAND HOMLESS FAMILY SOLUTIONS)
    one grant, 2025 · $7k
  • WILLIAM TEMPLE HOUSE
    one grant, 2025 · $4k · revenue 0%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES
    one grant, 2025 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Port Angeles Food Bank

Nourishing our community. the port angeles food bank is the main food bank in clallam county, providing food to 13 other area pantries and meal programs as well as providing food to over 5,000 individuals per month.

Food & Nutrition
2
Portland Street Medicine

We offer our homeless neighbors accessible whole-person care to improve and support health, and to bridge a gap in trust between people and systems.

Health
3
Our Village Gardens

Our village gardens brings a spirit of hope to the people by growing and sharing food, learning and teaching skills, and empowering community leadership.(continued on schedule o)our village gardens leverages community organizing, skill…

Food & Nutrition
4
Community Human Services Corporation

Chs empowers individuals and families to live in stable housing, connect to community resources, build relationships and access quality food.

Human Services
5
Impact Nw

Impact nw prevents homelessness by supporting people as they navigate their journey to stability and strength. founded in portland in 1966, impact nw now serves 26,944 people a year in the greater portland, oregon metro area, including…

Human Services
6
Oregon Coast Community Action

Positive change for thriving communities: to empower people to work toward social and economic independence, otherwise improving the lives of those served by the corporation, under relevant community services block grant programs.

Housing & Shelter
7
Community Sharing Program

Provide South Lane County community members with basic needs resources, life skills, and resources toward self-sufficiency.

Human Services
8
Family Promise of Tualatin Valley

To provide families and individuals experiencing homelessness temporary emergency shelter with intensive case management support while they work toward the goal of safe, stable and affordable housing.

Human Services
9
Sheltercare

Sheltercare offers a variety of housing and support services for people who are homeless or those facing homelessness with a committed focus on the community's most vulnerable individuals dealing with psychiatric disabilities, acquired…

Housing & Shelter
10
Catholic Charities of Spokane

Catholic charities affirms the dignity of every person, partnering with parishes and the greater community to serve and advocate for those who are vulnerable, bringing stability and hope to people throughout eastern washington.

Human Services
11
Columbia Pacific Food Bank

Columbia pacific food bank is the regional food distribution center for columbia county, oregon and local food pantry for the community of saint helens.

Food & Nutrition
12
The Wallace Medical Concern

We partner with our community to make good health possible for all. wallace serves individuals and families who face barriers to care throughout the east multnomah county in the portland metropolitan area.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Path Home; the most unlike its peers is Hualalai Ohana Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
19/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OREGON FOOD BANK: $101,000 · OtherOREGON FOOD BANKBLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY: $42,000 · OtherBLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITYASSISTANCE LEAGUE COLUMBIA PACIFIC: $38,000 · OtherASSISTANCE LEAGUE COLUMBIA PACIFICNEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC: $32,500 · OtherNEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INCOUTSIDE IN: $27,500 · OtherOUTSIDE INST ANDREW NATIVITY SCHOOL: $16,000 · OtherPROVIDENCE CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION: $12,500 · OtherHUALALAI OHANA FOUNDATION: $15,000 · OtherChildren's Cancer Association: $15,000 · Other+8 more: $36,000 · Other+8 moreHABITAT FOR HUMANITY PORTLAND METRO EAST: $90,000 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY PORTLAND …PATH HOME: $60,000 · Housing & ShelterPATH HOMEROSE HAVEN CIC: $40,000 · Housing & ShelterROSE HAVEN CICSUNSHINE DIVISION INC: $46,000 · Crime & LegalMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC: $31,000 · Food & NutritionURBAN GLEANERS: $12,000 · Food & NutritionPOTLUCK IN THE PARK: $3,000 · Food & NutritionClackamas Service Center: $26,000 · Human ServicesST MARY'S HOME: $6,000 · Human ServicesSTORE TO DOOR: $2,000 · Human ServicesCentral City Concern: $17,000 · HealthRANDALL CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $6,000 · HealthCASA FOR CHILDREN INC: $22,500 · Civil Rights
Other$335,500Housing & Shelter$190,000Crime & Legal$46,000Food & Nutrition$46,000Human Services$34,000Health$23,000Civil Rights$22,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOREGON FOOD BANK: $101,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY PORTLAND METRO EAST: $90,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPATH HOME: $60,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetSUNSHINE DIVISION INC: $46,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY: $42,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetROSE HAVEN CIC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE COLUMBIA PACIFIC: $38,000 over 9y, 4.7% of budgetNEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC: $32,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC: $31,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOUTSIDE IN: $27,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetClackamas Service Center: $26,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetCASA FOR CHILDREN INC: $22,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCentral City Concern: $17,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHUALALAI OHANA FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetChildren's Cancer Association: $15,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPROVIDENCE CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetURBAN GLEANERS: $12,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRANDALL CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetClatsop Community Action: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM TEMPLE HOUSE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPOTLUCK IN THE PARK: $3,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSTORE TO DOOR: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY PORTLAND METRO EAST ↗
  • Who funds PATH HOME ↗
  • Who funds SUNSHINE DIVISION INC ↗
  • Who funds BLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY ↗
  • Who funds ROSE HAVEN CIC ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE COLUMBIA PACIFIC ↗
  • Who funds NEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds OUTSIDE IN ↗
  • Who funds Clackamas Service Center ↗
  • Who funds CASA FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds Central City Concern ↗
  • Who funds HUALALAI OHANA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Children's Cancer Association ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds URBAN GLEANERS ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S HOME ↗
  • Who funds RANDALL CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Clatsop Community Action ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM TEMPLE HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds POTLUCK IN THE PARK ↗
  • Who funds STORE TO DOOR ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR27.4× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · The Autzen Foundation · Juan Young Trust · Hillman Family Foundations · Clark Foundation · The Swigert Foundation · Wheeler Foundation · The Holzman Foundation · The Robert D and Marcia H Randall Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tim and Mary Boyle Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tim and Mary Boyle Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Outside in: 33% of income from government
  • Clatsop Community Action: 26% of income from government
  • Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
  • New Avenues for Youth Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Habitat for Humanity Portland Metro East: 14% of income from government
  • Central City Concern: 10% of income from government
  • Clackamas Service Center: 9% of income from government
  • Casa for Children Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Randall Childrens Hospital Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Tim and Mary Boyle Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Tim and Mary Boyle Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tim and Mary Boyle’s filings →

More from the funding graph