Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Tim and Mary Boyle Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$126k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Housing & Shelter$238kFood & Nutrition$212kHuman Services$64kHealth$61kEducation$31kCrime & Legal$19kYouth Development$6k
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $79k
$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$964k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PORTLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$28,000
PATH HOME (PORTLAND HOMELESS FAMILY SOLUTIONS)$14,000
BLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY$14,000
OREGON FOOD BANK$13,000
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF THE COLUMBIA PACIFIC$10,000
CLACKAMAS SERVICE CENTER$8,000
OUTSIDE IN$8,000
THE SUNSHINE DIVISION$6,000
ROSE HAVEN$5,000
MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE$5,000
NEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH$5,000
CASA FOR CHILDREN$4,000
CHILDREN'S CANCER ASSOCIATION$2,000
URBAN GLEANERS$2,000
STORE TO DOOR$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ST MARY'S HOME FOR BOYS: $3k → 8%ST MARY'S HOME FOR BOYS: $3k → 8%CLACKAMAS SERVICE CENTER: $8k → 12%CLACKAMAS SERVICE CENTER: $4k → 12%CLACKAMAS SERVICE CENTER: $3k → 12%CLACKAMAS SERVICE CENTER: $3k → 12%CLACKAMAS SERVICE CENTER: $2k → 12%CLACKAMAS SERVICE CENTER: $2k → 12%STORE TO DOOR: $1k → 12%CLACKAMAS SERVICE CENTER: $2k → 12%STORE TO DOOR: $1k → 12%CLACKAMAS SERVICE CENTER: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$630k · 26 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

26 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
0

Total granted

$630k
$0

Still filing today

85%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesFood & NutritionHealthCrime & LegalArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY PORTLAND METRO EAST
    8× · 2017–2024 · $90k · revenue +58%
  • OREGON FOOD BANK
    8× · 2017–2024 · $88k · revenue +70%
  • PH
    PATH HOME
    8× · 2017–2024 · $60k · revenue +324%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Port Angeles Food Bank

    Nourishing our community. the port angeles food bank is the main food bank in clallam county, providing food to 13 other area pantries and meal programs as well as providing food to over 5,000 individuals per month.

    Food & Nutrition
    2
    Portland Street Medicine

    We offer our homeless neighbors accessible whole-person care to improve and support health, and to bridge a gap in trust between people and systems.

    Health
    3
    Oregon Coast Community Action

    Positive change for thriving communities: to empower people to work toward social and economic independence, otherwise improving the lives of those served by the corporation, under relevant community services block grant programs.

    Housing & Shelter
    4
    Our Village Gardens

    Our village gardens brings a spirit of hope to the people by growing and sharing food, learning and teaching skills, and empowering community leadership.(continued on schedule o)our village gardens leverages community organizing, skill…

    Food & Nutrition
    5
    Community Human Services Corporation

    Chs empowers individuals and families to live in stable housing, connect to community resources, build relationships and access quality food.

    Human Services
    6
    Impact Nw

    Impact nw prevents homelessness by supporting people as they navigate their journey to stability and strength. founded in portland in 1966, impact nw now serves 26,944 people a year in the greater portland, oregon metro area, including…

    Human Services
    7
    Community Sharing Program

    Provide South Lane County community members with basic needs resources, life skills, and resources toward self-sufficiency.

    Human Services
    8
    Sheltercare

    Sheltercare offers a variety of housing and support services for people who are homeless or those facing homelessness with a committed focus on the community's most vulnerable individuals dealing with psychiatric disabilities, acquired…

    Housing & Shelter
    9
    Family Promise of Tualatin Valley

    To provide families and individuals experiencing homelessness temporary emergency shelter with intensive case management support while they work toward the goal of safe, stable and affordable housing.

    Human Services
    10
    Catholic Charities of Spokane

    Catholic charities affirms the dignity of every person, partnering with parishes and the greater community to serve and advocate for those who are vulnerable, bringing stability and hope to people throughout eastern washington.

    Human Services
    11
    United Way of the Columbia-Willamette

    At United Way of the Columbia-Willamette (UWCW), we envision an Oregon and Southwest Washington where every child and family - regardless of geography, race, or family incomehas a stable foundation and access to the resources and support…

    Philanthropy
    12
    Columbia Pacific Food Bank

    Columbia pacific food bank is the regional food distribution center for columbia county, oregon and local food pantry for the community of saint helens.

    Food & Nutrition

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Path Home and the most unlike its peers is Hualalai Ohana Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

    THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr18%15%10–20yr19%40%20–35yr12%30%35–55yr14%15%55yr+
    THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr18%20%10–20yr19%20%20–35yr12%44%35–55yr14%16%55yr+

    The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

    Closures · last 5 years

    The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

    orgs you fund
    0.0%0/23
    the rest of the field
    13%
    655/5,093

    Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

    04the grantee network

    22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    8
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    22/22
    Grantees still filing
    19/22
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    OREGON FOOD BANK — $88,000 · OtherOREGON FOOD BANKBLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY — $36,000 · OtherBLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITYASSISTANCE LEAGUE COLUMBIA PACIFIC — $36,000 · OtherASSISTANCE LEAGUE COLUMBIA PACIFICNEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC — $27,500 · OtherNEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INCOUTSIDE IN — $27,500 · OtherOUTSIDE INST ANDREW NATIVITY SCHOOL — $16,000 · OtherST ANDREW NATIVITY SCHOOLPROVIDENCE CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION — $12,500 · OtherChildren's Cancer Association — $15,000 · OtherHUALALAI OHANA FOUNDATION — $15,000 · Other+4 more — $16,000 · Other+4 moreHABITAT FOR HUMANITY PORTLAND METRO EAST — $90,000 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY PORTLAND MET…PATH HOME — $60,000 · Housing & ShelterPATH HOMEROSE HAVEN CIC — $35,000 · Housing & ShelterROSE HAVEN CICSUNSHINE DIVISION INC — $40,000 · Crime & LegalMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC — $26,000 · Food & NutritionURBAN GLEANERS — $12,000 · Food & NutritionPOTLUCK IN THE PARK — $2,000 · Food & NutritionClackamas Service Center — $26,000 · Human ServicesST MARY'S HOME — $6,000 · Human ServicesSTORE TO DOOR — $2,000 · Human ServicesCentral City Concern — $17,000 · HealthRANDALL CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $6,000 · HealthCASA FOR CHILDREN INC — $18,500 · Civil Rights
    Other$289,500Housing & Shelter$185,000Crime & Legal$40,000Food & Nutrition$40,000Human Services$34,000Health$23,000Civil Rights$18,500

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY PORTLAND METRO EAST — $90,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK — $88,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPATH HOME — $60,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetSUNSHINE DIVISION INC — $40,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY — $36,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE COLUMBIA PACIFIC — $36,000 over 8y, 4.7% of budgetROSE HAVEN CIC — $35,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetNEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC — $27,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetOUTSIDE IN — $27,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetClackamas Service Center — $26,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC — $26,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCASA FOR CHILDREN INC — $18,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCentral City Concern — $17,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Cancer Association — $15,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHUALALAI OHANA FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetPROVIDENCE CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION — $12,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetURBAN GLEANERS — $12,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRANDALL CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPOTLUCK IN THE PARK — $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetClatsop Community Action — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTORE TO DOOR — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY PORTLAND METRO EAST
    • Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK
    • Who funds PATH HOME
    • Who funds SUNSHINE DIVISION INC
    • Who funds BLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY
    • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE COLUMBIA PACIFIC
    • Who funds ROSE HAVEN CIC
    • Who funds NEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC
    • Who funds OUTSIDE IN
    • Who funds Clackamas Service Center
    • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC
    • Who funds CASA FOR CHILDREN INC
    • Who funds Central City Concern
    • Who funds Children's Cancer Association
    • Who funds HUALALAI OHANA FOUNDATION
    • Who funds PROVIDENCE CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION
    • Who funds URBAN GLEANERS
    • Who funds RANDALL CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    • Who funds ST MARY'S HOME
    • Who funds POTLUCK IN THE PARK
    • Who funds Clatsop Community Action
    • Who funds STORE TO DOOR

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    The Oregon Community FoundationOR27.4× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · The Autzen Foundation · Juan Young Trust · Hillman Family Foundations · Clark Foundation · The Swigert Foundation · Wheeler Foundation · The Holzman Foundation · The Robert D and Marcia H Randall Charitable Trust

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Tim and Mary Boyle Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 14%
    • Outside in33% of income from government
    • Clatsop Community Action26% of income from government
    • Oregon Food Bank21% of income from government
    • New Avenues for Youth Inc20% of income from government
    • Habitat for Humanity Portland Metro East14% of income from government
    • Central City Concern10% of income from government
    • Clackamas Service Center9% of income from government
    • Casa for Children Inc2% of income from government
    • Randall Childrens Hospital Foundation0% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tim and Mary Boyle Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Tim and Mary Boyle Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph